Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding and communicating sustainability: global versus regional perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there is no single definition of sustainability, most would agree that it implies that a system is to be maintained at a certain level, held within certain limits. Sustainability denies run-away growth, but it also precludes any substantial set backs or cuts. This sustainability path is hard to reconcile with the renewal cycle that can be observed in most living systems developing according to their natural intrinsic mechanisms. Besides, since different human dominated systems are in significantly different states and stages of development, sustaining those states assumes maintaining social disparities in perpetuity. This creates a challenge in communicating the ideas of sustainability in different regions. Systems are parts of hierarchies where systems of higher levels are made of subsystems from lower levels. Renewal in components is an important factor of adaptation and evolution. But then sustainability of a system borrows from sustainability of a supra-system and rests upon lack of sustainability in subsystems. Therefore by sustaining certain systems beyond their renewal cycle, we decrease the sustainability of larger, higher level systems. The only way to resolve this contradiction is to agree that the biosphere as a whole with humans as one of its components is the only system which sustainability we are to seek.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K., Bolin, B. et al. (1995). Policy Forum on “Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment”. Science, Vol. 268. 28 April 1995.

  • Bertalanfy, L. Von (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanfy, L. Von (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller, 295p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. B., Sobel, M. J. (1975). Stability in time-varying ecosystems. American Journal of Nature 109, 625–646. .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City, (2005) URL: http://www.wessex.ac.uk/conferences/2006/city06.

  • Costanza, R. (1992). Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. In R. Costanza, B. D. Haskell, & B. G. Norton (Eds.), Ecosystem health: New goals for environmental management (pp. 239–256). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology. 6, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Patten, B. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15, 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Voinov, A. (1995). Interaction between economics and the environment from the point of view of sustainable development. In V. A. Koptyug, & M. Uppenbrink (Eds.), Sustainable development of the lake baikal region. NATO ASI Series, Partnership Sub-Series 2. Environment, Vol.6, (pp. 33–58). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Daly, H. E. (1977). Steady-state economics. San Francisco: Freeman and Cos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebleman, J. (1954). Theory of integrative levels. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5(17), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google (2005a). URL: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&q=define:Sustainability.

  • Google (2005b). URL: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&q=define:Sustainable%20development.

  • Ghilarov, A. (1996). What does ‘biodiversity’ mean—scientific problem or convenient myth? TREE, 11(7), 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumilev, L. N. (1978). Ethnogenesis and ethnosphere. Priroda (Nature), 1(46–55), 2(43–50). (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumilev, L. N. (1990). Ethnogenesis and the biosphere. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. (1994). Fire patterns in the southern everglades. In: S. M. Davis, & J. C.Ogden (Eds.), Everglades. The ecosystem and its restoration (pp. 291–305). Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In C. C. William, & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292–320). New York: Cambridge University Press for the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

  • Holling, C. S. (1992). Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62(4), 447–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1996). What Barriers? What Bridges? In L. H Gunderson, C. S. Holling, S., &S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp.3–34). New York: Columbia Univ. Press. .

  • Holling, C. S. (2000). Theories for sustainable futures. Conservation Ecology, 4(2), 7. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7/ .

  • Jaklitsch, F. et al. (1996). Comprehensive plan (draft) (p. 56). Maryland: Calvert County.

  • Moldan, B. (1995). A proposal for a set of aggregated indicators of the environmental dimension of sustainability. In:V. A. Koptyug, M. Uppenbrink (Eds), Sustainable development of the lake baikal region. Nato asi series, partnership sub-series 2. Environment, Vol.6 (pp.71–80). Heidelberg: Springer. .

  • Novikoff, A. (1945). The concept of integrative levels and biology. Science, 101(2618), 209–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1999). Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. Board on sustainable development (384 p). National Research Council, [online] URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309067839/html.

  • Neumayer, E. (1999). Weak versus strong sustainability (294 p) Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Norton, B. G. (1992). A new paradigm for environmental management. In R. Costanza, B. D. Haskell, & B. G. Norton (Eds.), Ecosystem health: New goals for environmental management (pp. 23–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • O’Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., Allen, H. T. F. (1986). A hierarchical concept of ecosystems (254 p). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  • Pearce, D.W., Atkinson, G. D. (1993). Capital theory and measurement of sustainable development: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 8(2), 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Voinov, A. (1996). Resource management: Can it sustain pacific northwest fishery and forest systems? Ecosystem Health, 2, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1991) Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. Marine Policy Center, WHOI, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.

  • Voinov, A. A. (1998). Paradoxes of sustainability. Journal of General Biology, 59, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment, Development) (1987). Our common future (400 p). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wimberly R. C. (1993). Policy perspectives on social, agricultural and rural sustainability. Rural Sociology, 58, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ykhanbai, H. (2000). Economics of environment and sustainable development (222 p). Ulanbaatar.

  • Zotin A. I., Zotina R. S. (1993). Phenomenological theory of development, growth and aging (364 p.). Moscow: Nauka (In Russian).

Download references

Acknowledgements

My thanks are to Courtland Smith and Alexei Ghilarov for stimulating discussions and useful comments. I appreciate the support and discussions during the Workshop “Understanding Sustainable Development: Models, Data, and Policy”, Graz, 2004, organized by Heriberto Cabezas and Michael Narodoslawsky. The work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0354298. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexey Voinov.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voinov, A. Understanding and communicating sustainability: global versus regional perspectives. Environ Dev Sustain 10, 487–501 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9076-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9076-x

Keywords

Navigation