The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability


This paper discusses the relationship of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and sustainable development. It deconstructs popular myths about a sustainable information society. One myth is that telework has reduced the need to travel and hence environmental pollution. The reality is that teleworkers make up only a small share of the total workforce, telework can generate new social relationships and hence the need for more travelling, work-related travel produces only a small amount of the total carbon dioxide emissions, and that the total distance travelled per employee is constantly rising. Another myth is that information economy is weightless and dematerialized which reduces environmental impacts. The energy and resource intensities of the ICT sector are indeed lower than the one of the total economy. The ICT sector also emits less CO2 than the total economy. But the ICT sector constitutes only a small portion of the total value added and fossil fuel combustion is still the dominant activity of modern industrial economies. Some stakeholders argue that virtual products allow resource, energy, and transport savings. But burning digital music on compact discs and DVDs, printing digital articles and books, etc. results in rebound effects that cause new material and energy impacts, computers have a low life span of 2–3 years, reusable and upgradeable computers and computer equipment are hardly used and might not be as profitable as non-reusable ones, computers are consuming much energy. Alternatives such as energy consumption labels on ICTs and green ICTs that consume less energy contradict dominant economic interests. A sustainable information society is a society that makes use of ICTs and knowledge for fostering a good life for all human beings of current and future generations by strengthening biological diversity, technological usability, economic wealth for all, political participation of all, and cultural wisdom. Achieving a sustainable information society costs, it demands a conscious reduction of profits by not investing in the future of capital, but the future of humans, society, and nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Alakeson, V., Aldrich, T., Goodman, J., & Jorgensen, B. (2003). Making the net work. Sustainable development in a digital society. Teddington. Forum for the Future.

  2. Barthel, C., et al. (2000). International climate policy & the IT-sector, Japan & Germany. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briefs, U. (2000). Ökologische Produktion und Neue Medien. Produkte der Zukunft auf dem Gebiet der Informations- und Kommunikationstechniken. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coyle, D. (1997). The weightless world. Strategies for managing the digital economy. London: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalal, B., & Bass, S. (2002). Sustainable development strategies. A resource book. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Information Technology Observatory (EITO) (2002). Jahrbuch 2002. Frankfurt/Main: EITO.

  8. Fleissner, P. (2005). Commodification, information, value and profit. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, Vol. 3, published online at:–005-0007-y.

  9. Foster, J. B. (2002). Ecology against capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frauenhofer Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI)/Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE) (2005). Der Einfluss moderner Gerätegenerationen der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik auf den Energieverbrauch in Deutschland bis zum Jahr 2010. Möglichkeiten zur Erhöhung der Energieeffizienz und zur Energieeinsparung in diesen Bereichen. Abschlussbericht an das BM für Wirtschaft und Arbeit. Karlsruhe/Zürich.

  11. Fuchs, C. (2002). Krise und Kritik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Norderstedt: Libri.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs, C. (2005). Wissenskapitalismus und Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen. Contribution at the Conference “Grundeinkommen 2005”, October 7–9, 2005, Vienna. Online Proceedings:

  13. Fuchs, C. (2006). The self-organization of cyberprotest. In The internet & society 2006. Ashurst: WIT Press.

  14. Greenpeace (2002). Corporate crimes. The need for an international instrument on corporate accountability and liability. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.

  15. Grote, A. (1994) Grüne Rechnung. Das Produkt Computer in der Ökobilanz. In CT, 10/1996.

  16. Hilty, L., et al. (2004a). Assessing the human, social, and environmental risks of pervasive computing. Human And Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 853–874.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hilty, L., et al. (2004b). The precautionary principle in the information society. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 787–799.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilty, L., et al. (2005). The precautionary principle in the information society. Effects of pervasive computing on health and environment. Berne: TA-SWISS, Center for Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hilty, L. M., & Ruddy, T. F. (2000). Towards a sustainable information society. Informatik/ Informatique, 4, 2–7.

  20. Huws, U. (2001). Der Mythos der New Economy. Das Argument, 42(5/6), 646–660.

  21. Junker, H. & Lang, C. V. (2002). Betriebliche Umweltinformatik, Nachhaltigkeit und Informationsgesellschaft. In: C. Floyd, C. Fuchs, & W. Hofkirchner (Eds.), Stufen zur Informationsgesellschaft Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski (pp.␣349–372). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

  22. Kelly, K. (1999). New rules for the new economy. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhndt, M., et al. (2003). Project theme report: virtual dematerialisation. eBusiness and Factor X. Online:

  24. Leadbeater, C. (2000). The weightless society. New York: Texere Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mansell, R., & Wehn, U. (Eds.) (1998). Knowledge societies. Information technology for sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  26. Marletta, P., et al. (2004). The Environmental impact of ISTs. E-Living Project Report. Online:

  27. Mettler, P. H. (1997). Sustainable technology – sustainability of what? FUTU Publication 3/97. Finland Futures Research Centre. Online:

  28. Quah, D. T. (1999). The weightless economy in growth. The Business Economist, 30(1), 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schallaböck, K. O., et al. (2003). Telework and sustainable development. Online:

  30. Servaes, J., & Carpentier, N. (Eds.) (2006). Towards a sustainable information society. Deconstructing WSIS. Bristol: Intellect.

  31. Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the actor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Türk, V., et al. (2003). The social and environmental impacts of digital music. A case study with EMI. Wuppertal Institute.

  33. World Resource Institute (WRI) (2000). The weight of nations. Material outflows from industrial economies. developing environmental indicators. Washington, DC: WRI.

    Google Scholar 

  34. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) (2003a). Declaration of principles. building the information society: A global challenge in the new millennium Online:

  35. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) (2003b). Plan of action. Online: http://www.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Fuchs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, C. The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 10, 291–309 (2008).

Download citation


  • ICTs
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable information society
  • Technology
  • Nature
  • Ecology