Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 291–309 | Cite as

The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability

  • Christian FuchsEmail author
Original Paper


This paper discusses the relationship of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and sustainable development. It deconstructs popular myths about a sustainable information society. One myth is that telework has reduced the need to travel and hence environmental pollution. The reality is that teleworkers make up only a small share of the total workforce, telework can generate new social relationships and hence the need for more travelling, work-related travel produces only a small amount of the total carbon dioxide emissions, and that the total distance travelled per employee is constantly rising. Another myth is that information economy is weightless and dematerialized which reduces environmental impacts. The energy and resource intensities of the ICT sector are indeed lower than the one of the total economy. The ICT sector also emits less CO2 than the total economy. But the ICT sector constitutes only a small portion of the total value added and fossil fuel combustion is still the dominant activity of modern industrial economies. Some stakeholders argue that virtual products allow resource, energy, and transport savings. But burning digital music on compact discs and DVDs, printing digital articles and books, etc. results in rebound effects that cause new material and energy impacts, computers have a low life span of 2–3 years, reusable and upgradeable computers and computer equipment are hardly used and might not be as profitable as non-reusable ones, computers are consuming much energy. Alternatives such as energy consumption labels on ICTs and green ICTs that consume less energy contradict dominant economic interests. A sustainable information society is a society that makes use of ICTs and knowledge for fostering a good life for all human beings of current and future generations by strengthening biological diversity, technological usability, economic wealth for all, political participation of all, and cultural wisdom. Achieving a sustainable information society costs, it demands a conscious reduction of profits by not investing in the future of capital, but the future of humans, society, and nature.


ICTs Sustainability Sustainable information society Technology Nature Ecology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alakeson, V., Aldrich, T., Goodman, J., & Jorgensen, B. (2003). Making the net work. Sustainable development in a digital society. Teddington. Forum for the Future.Google Scholar
  2. Barthel, C., et al. (2000). International climate policy & the IT-sector, Japan & Germany. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  4. Briefs, U. (2000). Ökologische Produktion und Neue Medien. Produkte der Zukunft auf dem Gebiet der Informations- und Kommunikationstechniken. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  5. Coyle, D. (1997). The weightless world. Strategies for managing the digital economy. London: Capstone.Google Scholar
  6. Dalal, B., & Bass, S. (2002). Sustainable development strategies. A resource book. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. European Information Technology Observatory (EITO) (2002). Jahrbuch 2002. Frankfurt/Main: EITO.Google Scholar
  8. Fleissner, P. (2005). Commodification, information, value and profit. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, Vol. 3, published online at:–005-0007-y.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, J. B. (2002). Ecology against capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  10. Frauenhofer Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI)/Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE) (2005). Der Einfluss moderner Gerätegenerationen der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik auf den Energieverbrauch in Deutschland bis zum Jahr 2010. Möglichkeiten zur Erhöhung der Energieeffizienz und zur Energieeinsparung in diesen Bereichen. Abschlussbericht an das BM für Wirtschaft und Arbeit. Karlsruhe/Zürich.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, C. (2002). Krise und Kritik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Norderstedt: Libri.Google Scholar
  12. Fuchs, C. (2005). Wissenskapitalismus und Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen. Contribution at the Conference “Grundeinkommen 2005”, October 7–9, 2005, Vienna. Online Proceedings: Scholar
  13. Fuchs, C. (2006). The self-organization of cyberprotest. In The internet & society 2006. Ashurst: WIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greenpeace (2002). Corporate crimes. The need for an international instrument on corporate accountability and liability. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.Google Scholar
  15. Grote, A. (1994) Grüne Rechnung. Das Produkt Computer in der Ökobilanz. In CT, 10/1996.Google Scholar
  16. Hilty, L., et al. (2004a). Assessing the human, social, and environmental risks of pervasive computing. Human And Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 853–874.Google Scholar
  17. Hilty, L., et al. (2004b). The precautionary principle in the information society. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 787–799.Google Scholar
  18. Hilty, L., et al. (2005). The precautionary principle in the information society. Effects of pervasive computing on health and environment. Berne: TA-SWISS, Center for Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
  19. Hilty, L. M., & Ruddy, T. F. (2000). Towards a sustainable information society. Informatik/ Informatique, 4, 2–7.Google Scholar
  20. Huws, U. (2001). Der Mythos der New Economy. Das Argument, 42(5/6), 646–660.Google Scholar
  21. Junker, H. & Lang, C. V. (2002). Betriebliche Umweltinformatik, Nachhaltigkeit und Informationsgesellschaft. In: C. Floyd, C. Fuchs, & W. Hofkirchner (Eds.), Stufen zur Informationsgesellschaft Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski (pp.␣349–372). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Kelly, K. (1999). New rules for the new economy. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhndt, M., et al. (2003). Project theme report: virtual dematerialisation. eBusiness and Factor X. Online: Scholar
  24. Leadbeater, C. (2000). The weightless society. New York: Texere Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Mansell, R., & Wehn, U. (Eds.) (1998). Knowledge societies. Information technology for sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marletta, P., et al. (2004). The Environmental impact of ISTs. E-Living Project Report. Online: Scholar
  27. Mettler, P. H. (1997). Sustainable technology – sustainability of what? FUTU Publication 3/97. Finland Futures Research Centre. Online: Scholar
  28. Quah, D. T. (1999). The weightless economy in growth. The Business Economist, 30(1), 40–53.Google Scholar
  29. Schallaböck, K. O., et al. (2003). Telework and sustainable development. Online: Scholar
  30. Servaes, J., & Carpentier, N. (Eds.) (2006). Towards a sustainable information society. Deconstructing WSIS. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  31. Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the actor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. Türk, V., et al. (2003). The social and environmental impacts of digital music. A case study with EMI. Wuppertal Institute.Google Scholar
  33. World Resource Institute (WRI) (2000). The weight of nations. Material outflows from industrial economies. developing environmental indicators. Washington, DC: WRI.Google Scholar
  34. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) (2003a). Declaration of principles. building the information society: A global challenge in the new millennium Online: Scholar
  35. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) (2003b). Plan of action. Online: http://www. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Information and Communication Technologies & SocietyUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations