Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS INDICATORS TO MONITOR FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: PRACTICE TO AN URBAN WATER SYSTEM

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although very often used, the concept of sustainable development has not yet been perceived pragmatically. Due to its process nature, in this paper, we argue that sustainable development is a process in which the essential feedback loops, or Viability Loops as we name them, in the system in question are kept healthy and functional. This process deals with evolutionary changes with the end point not known in advance. According to this perception, measurement of sustainable development does not make sense. Rather, we should look for the process indicators to monitor systems for sustainable development. The purpose of the paper is to develop a methodology to deal with monitoring systems for sustainable development and its practice in an urban water system. Using a system dynamics approach, the paper adopts a systemic monitoring framework based on the idea of Viability Loops to define process indicators to monitor systems for sustainable development. To illustrate the application of the framework, its practice in the urban water system of Tehran, the capital of Iran, is provided as an example. The example of the urban water supply system of Tehran is given as a case study, albeit with some unavailable data. Here, four typical viability loops are discussed. The results of this application show that the flows of informative signals are lacking. Adopting the process indicators, we can see the gaps between the public perceptions of water abundance, the costs of water provision and energy utilizations, and what is going on in the reality are getting wider. That indicates that the viability loops are not functional enough to produce effective changes to offset the reinforcing mechanisms. The sustainable development of the system is impaired due to the persistence of those reinforcing mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE Task Committee for Sustainability Criteria: 1998, Sustainability Criteria for Water Resource Systems ASCE, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley R., Hopkinson P. 2002, Sewer systems and performance indicators – into the 21st century Urban Water 4: 123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley R.M., Souter N., Butler D., Davies J., Dunkerley J., Hendry S. 1999, Assessment of the sustainability of alternatives for the disposal of domestic sanitary waste Water Science and Technology 39(5): 251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri, A. and Hjorth, P.: 2006, ‘Monitoring for sustainable development: A systemic framework’, International Journal of Sustainable Development (accepted)

  • Balkema A.J., Preisig H.A., Otterpohl R., Lambert F.J.D. 2002, Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems Urban Water 4: 153–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand-Krajewski J.L., Barraud S., Chocat B. 2000, Need for improved methodologies and measurements for sustainable management of urban water systems Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossel H. 1999, Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications International Institute for Sustainable Development Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J.P.: 1992, Meteorology and Hydrology for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, World Meteorological Organization No. 769, Secretariat of the WMO

  • Cary, J.: 1998, ‘Institutional innovation in natural resource management in Australia: The triumph of creativity over adversity’, in Abstracts of the Conference Knowledge Generation and Transfer: Implications for Agriculture in the 21st Century, Berkeley, University of California-Berkeley

  • Crettaz P., Jolliet O., Cuanillon J.M., Orlande S. 1999, Life cycle assessment of drinking water and rainwater for toilet flushing Aqua 48(3): 73–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson R.H.C., Morse G.K., Leshter J.N., Edge D.R. 1995, Life-cycle analysis of small-scale sewage treatment processes Journal of the Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management 9(3): 317–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M. 1997, Society’s interaction with the water cycle: A conceptual framework for a more holistic approach Hydrological Sciences Journal 42: 451–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark, M.: 1988, ‘Sustainable development as seen from a water perspective’, in Perspectives of Sustainable Development, Stockholm, Stockholm Studies in Natural Resources Management, No.1, pp. 71–84

  • Gutierrez-Martin F., Dahab M.F. 1998, Issues of sustainability and pollution prevention in environmental engineering education Water Science and Technology 38: 271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes Y.Y. 1992, Sustainable development: A holistic approach to natural resources management Water International 17: 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström D., Jeppsson U., Kärrman E., (2000), A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström D., Kärrman E. 1997, Exergy analysis and nutrient flows of various sewerage systems Water Science and Technology 35(9): 135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, P. and Bagheri, A.: 2006, ‘Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach’, Futures 38(1), 74–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S.: 2000, ‘Theories for sustainable futures’, Conservation Ecology 4(2), 7. [Online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7/

  • Holmberg, J.: 1995, Socio-Ecological Principles and Indicators for Sustainability, Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Physical Resource Theory, Göteborg, Sweden, Chalmers University of Technology & University of Göteborg

  • Holmberg J., Robèrt K.H., Eriksson K.E. 1996, Socio-ecological principles for sustainability in: Costanza R., Olmlan S., Martinez-Alier J., (eds), Getting Down to Earth – Practical Applications of Ecological Economics International Society of Ecological Economics Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G.H., Xia J. 2001, Barriers to sustainable water-quality management Journal of Environmental Management 61: 1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiah A., 1990, Water-quality management for sustainable agricultural development Natural Resources Forum 14: 22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz Z.W. 1997, Water resources for sustainable development Hydrological Science Journal 42: 467–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks D.P., 1997, Quantifying trends in system sustainability Hydrological Science Journal 42: 513–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks D.P., 2000, Sustainable water resources management Water International 25(1): 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M., Bengtsson M., Molander S., 2000, Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems: Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads Environmental Science and Technology 34: 180–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M., Morrison G.M., 2002, A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems Urban Water 4: 145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J. 2004, Limits to Growth – The 30-Year Update Chelsea Green White River Junction, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu W.Y., Harris W.M. 1996, China: The forecast of its environmental situation in 21st century Journal of Environmental Management 47: 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D.W., 1993 Blueprint 3: Measuring Sustainable Development Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet J., Bossel H. 2000, An ethics-based systems approach to indicators of sustainable development International Journal of Sustainable Development 3(3): 221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plate E.J. 1993, Sustainable development of water resources: A challenge to science and engineering Water International 18: 84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ròbert K.H., Daly H., Hawken P., Holmberg J., 1997 A compass for sustainable development International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4: 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robèrt K.H., 2000, Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelveld P.J., Klapwijk A., Eggles P.G., Rulkens W.H., van Starkenburg W., 1997, Sustainability of municipal wastewater treatment Water Science and Technology 35(10): 221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic S.P., 1996a, Decision support system for sustainable management of water resources: 1 General principles Water International 21: 223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic S.P., 1996b, Decision support system for sustainable management of water resources: 2 Case studies Water International 21: 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson U., Björklund A., Carlsson M., Dalemo M., 2000, Environmental and economic analysis for biodegradable waste Resources Conservation and Recycling 28: 29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki M., 1998, A look at technology’s role in sustainable water management Water Quality International 5: 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehran Water & Waste Water Company: 2001, Activities Report: Past, Now, Future Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman A.M., Lundström H., Svingby M. 1998, Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems International Journal of LCA 3(3): 145–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J., Hu B. 1997, A grey system model for predicting trend change of urban wastewater load Journal of Environmental Hydrology 5: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Swedish Institute for its financial support, Somayeh Sima, Reza Roozbahani, and Younes Gharbali Moghaddam for provision of necessary data, and also the editor and the anonymous reviewer for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, S-221 00, Lund, Sweden

    ALI BAGHERI & PEDER HJORTH

Authors
  1. ALI BAGHERI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. PEDER HJORTH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ALI BAGHERI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAGHERI, A., HJORTH, P. A FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS INDICATORS TO MONITOR FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: PRACTICE TO AN URBAN WATER SYSTEM. Environ Dev Sustain 9, 143–161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9009-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation