Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental Optimisation in Fractionating Industrial Wastes Using Contribution Margin Analysis as a Sustainable Development Tool

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a method of estimating the “true” internal costs of industrial waste, aimed at promoting environmentally friendly waste management. The study employs contribution margin analysis and a model – The Model for Efficient Use of Resources for Optimal Production Economy (EUROPE) – introduced by the author for assigning industrial costs to waste. In a business sense, waste is regarded as having the same basic status as any normal industrial product – the equality principle. Application of the method is suggested to create incentives for environmental improvement and profitability improvement in companies. Although the results of two case studies show the generation of waste to have a substantial negative impact on the final operating income, due to the internal shadow price costs it creates, this is regarded as an unavoidable consequence of the companies' acting in accordance with the principle of sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Asplund U. Danielson L. Moström (1994) Construction in the Ecocycle: Environmental Effects Costs and Consequences (Swedish: Byggandet i kretsloppet: miljöeffekter kostnader och konsekvenser), Stockholm, Stockholms byggförlag, p. 89

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bonoli M. Bergonzoni P. Buttol F. Ciancabilla P. Neri M. Ziosi (2001) Environmental and economical assessment for a washer disposal T.H. Christensen R. Cossu R. Stegmann (Eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Vol. V Cagliari Sardinia 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • S.-s. Chung C.W.H. Lo (2003) ArticleTitle'Evaluating sustainability in waste management: the case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong', Resources Conservation and Recycling 37 119–145 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00075-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (2001) BPEO–Decision Makers' Guide UK Environment & Heritage Service pp. 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dorfmann P.A. Samuelson R.M. Solow (1958) Linear Programming and Economic Analysis New York McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 15

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Environment DG: 9 March, 2000, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/waste/facts_en.htm..

  • European Commission, Environment DG: 24 February, 2003, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ecoindus/intro.htm.

  • European Council: 1975, Council Directive 1975/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, Article 3.

  • European Council (1991) Council Directive 1991/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 Article 3 amending Directive 1975/442/EEC on waste

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council (1997) Council Resolution of 24 February 1997 on a Community strategy for waste management Official Journal C 076 11/03/1997 pp. 0001–0004

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council: 1999, Council Directive 1999/31/EEC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, pp. 1–3.

  • European Environment Agency (EEA) (2003) Europe's environment: the third assessment Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  • T.P. Frenckner (1953) Breakdown of Costs and Expense Accounting (Swedish: Kostnadsfördelning och utgiftsredovisning) Stockholm P.A. Norstedt & Söners Förlag, pp. 36–55

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Hannequart (2002) 'Instruments for recycling specific waste streams economic instruments and individual financial responsibility' in Proceedings of the VI European Forum on Resource and Waste Management, Valencia, 6–7 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • C.T. Horngren G.L. Sundem W.O. Stratton (2002) Introduction to Management Accounting, Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice-Hall International, pp. 49 200

    Google Scholar 

  • S.E. Johansson L.A. Samuelson (1992) Industrial Estimation and Accounting, (Swedish: Industriell kalkylering och redovisning), Stockholm, Norstedts Juridik, p. 173, 174 186

    Google Scholar 

  • K. (Ed.) Lidgren (1993) Industrial Environmental Economics (Swedish: Industriell miljöekonomi) Lund Liber-Hermods, p. 234

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Linher (2002) 'The Green Paper on IPP and its follow-up' in Proceedings of the VI European Forum on Resource and Waste Management Valencia, 6–7 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Masui T. Morita J. Kyogoku (2000) ArticleTitle'Analysis of recycling activities using multi-sectoral economic model with material flow' Eur. J. Oper. Res 122 405–415 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00242-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Ness T. Bramryd (2001) 'Closing waste loops: an economic comparison of MSW treatment systems in Sweden' T.H. Christensen R. Cossu R. Stegmann (Eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium Vol. V Cagliari Sardinia, 1–5 October 2001 31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Olsson P.-H. Skärvad (2000) Business Economics 99 (Swedish: Företagsekonomi 99), Malmö, Liber ekonomi, pp. 135 188

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Reijnders (2000) ArticleTitle'A normative strategy for sustainable resource choice and recycling', Resources Conservation and Recycling 28 121–133 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00037-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP), UK: 1976, The Fifth Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUnited Nations Conference on Environment and development (1992) Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Rio de Janeiro 3–14 June 1992. (Chapter 21)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 13 April, 2003a, http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/industd/water/index.htm.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 13 April, 2003b, http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/industd/air/index.htm.

  • A. Valentini L. Frattini A. Miorandi (2001) 'Economical and environmental impacts associated with biological treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste' T.H. Christensen R. Cossu R. Stegmann (Eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium Vol. V Cagliari, Sardinia, 1–5 October 2001 415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wallström (2001) Future Directions for European Waste Policy European Waste Forum Brussels, 21 June 2001, in G.Vogel, (Ed.), 'Evolution of Prevention in the European Union', Proceedings of the VI European Forum on Resource and Waste Management, Valencia, 6–7 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Stenis.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenis, J. Environmental Optimisation in Fractionating Industrial Wastes Using Contribution Margin Analysis as a Sustainable Development Tool. Environ Dev Sustain 7, 363–376 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-2377-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-2377-z

Keywords

Navigation