Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Reference Point Approach for Multi-objective Assessment and Reduction of Ground-Level O3 Air Quality Monitoring Network in Vojvodina Province, Serbia

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A monitoring network of ground-level ozone (O3) concentration levels in Vojvodina Province, Serbia, has been established in several phases, resulting in nine sampling sites (monitoring stations). Because maintenance of a monitoring network is financially very demanding, identifying potentially redundant ozone sites and reducing the network to a cost-effective and functional one are challenging and complex tasks. To provide an easily applicable but reliable analytical framework that will allow decision-makers and other stakeholders to identify redundant ground O3 monitors, the reference point approach, presented by Cetinkaya and Harmancioglu (Journal of Hydrology, 2014), is adopted for a multi-objective assessment of the O3 monitoring network. The evaluation process of the stations’ performance and their ranking is implemented in several phases. Firstly, a comprehensive set of 13 performance attributes is defined and associated with location and environmental criteria, followed by defining the set of alternatives. Next, all required attribute data are collected and stations are evaluated using the reference point approach. Finally, verification of the results is performed by aggregation of ranks obtained using the ideal point multi-criteria methods compromise programing and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The aggregation process is performed using the Borda count and Kemeny social choice theory methods. Results indicate that the number of stations can be significantly reduced by 67%. Also, selection of the three best performing stations enabled identification of a core network that is expected to be functionally and financially sustainable under growing environmental and economic pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Austria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. (2008). Health risks of ozone from long-range transboundary air pollution. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78647/E91843.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2015.

  2. CTRLAP (1979). Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution. manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads & levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/lrtap/full%20text/1979.CLRTAP.e.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2015.

  3. UNECE. (1999). Protocol to abate acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone. http://www.unece.org/ro/env/lrtap/multi_h1.html. Accessed May 2, 2015.

  4. EC. (2001). Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on National Emission Ceilings for certain pollutants (NEC Directive).

  5. EC. (2008). Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21. May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe.

  6. COM. (2013). Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions, A Clean Air Programme for Europe. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0918. Accessed May 4, 2015.

  7. COM. (2005). Commission of the European Communities Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Thematic Strategy on air pollution, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0446. Accessed April 21 2015.

  8. RS. (2009). Low on air protection (Official Gazette RS" No. 36/2009 i 10/2013).

  9. RS. (2010). Regulation on conditions for monitoring and requirements of air quality ("Official Gazette RS" No. 11 / 2010).

  10. Miller, A. Y., & Sager, T. (1994). Site redundancy in urban ozone monitoring. Journal Air & Waste Management Association, 44, 1097–1102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, J. S., & Chan, C. C. (1997). Redundant measurements of urban air monitoring networks in air quality reporting. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 47, 614–619.

  12. Raffuse, S. M., Sullivan, D. C., McCarthy, M. C., Penfold, B. M., & Hafner, H. R. (2007). Ambient air monitoring network assessment guidance: Analytical techniques for Technical assessments of ambient air monitoring networks. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/datamang/network-assessment-uidance.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pope, R., & Wu, J. (2014). A multi-objective assessment of an air quality monitoring network using environmental, economic, and social indicators and GIS-based models. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 64(6), 721–737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabello, J. M., Ruiz, F., Pérez-Gladish, B., & Méndez-Rodríguez, P. (2014). Synthetic indicators of mutual funds’ environmental responsibility: an application of the reference point method. European Journal of Operational Research, 236, 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cetinkaya, C. P., & Harmancioglu, N. B. (2014). Reduction of streamflow monitoring networks by a reference point approach. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dujardin, Y., Vanderpooten, D., & Boillot, F. (2015). A multi-objective interactive system for adaptive traffic control. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(2), 601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luque, M., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D. (2015). Equivalent reference points in multiobjective programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 2205–2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pintoa, F. S., Figueira, J. R., & Marquesa, R. C. (2015). A multi-objective approach with soft constraints for water supply and wastewater coverage improvements. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruiz, A. B., Saborido, R., & Luque, M. (2015). A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: The weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization, 62(1), 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wierzbicki, A. P. (1980). The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In G. Fandel & T. Gal (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision making; theory and applications, lecture notes in economic and mathematical systems, vol. 177 (pp. 468–486). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. S. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple citeria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, J. S. (1988). Social choice theory. An introduction (pp. 4–56). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Litvak, B. G. (1982). Экспертная информация методы получения и анализа. Москва: Радио и Связь.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wierzbicki, A. P. (2000). Reference point methodology. In A. P. Wierzbicki, M. Makowski, & J. Wessels (Eds.), Model-based decision support methodology with environmental applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Harmancioglu, N. B., Icaga, Y., & Gul, A. (2004). The use of an optimization method in assessment of water quality sampling sites. EWRA, European Water, 5(6), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Census of Population. (2011). Households and dwellings in the Republic of Serbia, Statically office of the Republic of Serbia. http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/. Accessed March 4, 2015.

  28. SORS. (2012). Municipatilies and regions in Republic of Serbia, Statistical office of the Republic of Serbia, ISSN 1450–9075, ISSN 2217–7981. http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/. Accessed May 27 2014.

  29. EC. (2007). Directive 97/101/EC: Council Decision of 27 January 1997 establishing a reciprocal exchange of information and data from networks and individual stations measuring ambient air pollution within the Member States.

  30. Larssen, S., Sluyter, R., Helmis, C. (1999). Criteria for EUROAIRNET - The EEA Air Quality Monitoring and Information Network (1999), Technical report No 12. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC12. Accessed April 19 2015.

  31. Ellis, A. W., Hildebrandt, M. L., Thomas, W. M., & Fernando, H. J. S. (2000). Analysis of the climatic mechanisms contributing to the summertime transport of lower atmospheric ozone across metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Climate Research, 15, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adame, J. A., Lozano, A., Bolıvar, J. P., De la Morena, B. A., Contreras, J., & Godoy, F. (2008). Behavior, distribution and variability of surface ozone at an arid region in the south of Iberian Peninsula (Seville, Spain). Chemosphere, 70, 841–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubino, R. A., Bruckman, L., Magyar, J., & J. (1976). Ozone Transport. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 26(10), 972–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Khoder, M. I. (2009). Diurnal, seasonal and weekdays–weekends variations of ground level ozone concentrations in an urban area in greater Cairo. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 149, 349–362. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0208-7.

  35. Vujic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Agarski, B., & Simunovic, K. (2016). Decision making framework for decreasing the redundancy of air quality monitoring stations in Vojvodina Province (Serbia). Technical Gazette, 23(5), 1423–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Plate, M. (2012). Evaluating sitting of air monitoring stations, EPA Region 9. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/2012conference/3C03Plate.pdf. Accessed on April 13 2015.

  37. Scheffe, R. D., Solomon, P. A., Husar, R., Hanley, T., Schmidt, M., Koerber, M., Gilroy, M., Hemby, J., Watkins, N., Papp, M., Rice, J., Tikvart, J., & Valentinetti, R. (2009). The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy: rethinking the role of national networks. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 59(5), 579–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. LADCO. (2010). DRAFT REPORT, Regional Network Assessment, States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. http://www.ladco.org/reports/general/Regional_Network_Assessment/index.html. Accessed on April 19 2015.

  39. SEPA. (2014). Agency for Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia, Annual report on Air Quality in Republic of Serbia for 2013, ISSN 2334–8763. http://www.sepa.gov.rs/download/VAZDUH2013.pdf. Accessed on April 13 2015.

  40. Scheffe, R., Husar, R., & Falke, S. (2000). Compliance monitoring (deviation from NAAQS), Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis. St. Louis: CAPITA Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Duenas, C., Fernandez, C. M., Canete, S., Carretero, J., & Liger, E. (2004). Analyses of ozone in urban and rural sites in Malaga (Spain). Chemosphere, 56, 631–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill International Book.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of grant (174003 OSNI) from the Serbian Ministry of Education and Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, Djure Djakovića bb, Zrenjanin, 23000, Serbia

    Bogdana Vujic

  2. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

    Zorica Srdjevic & Bojan Srdjevic

Authors
  1. Bogdana Vujic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zorica Srdjevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bojan Srdjevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdana Vujic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vujic, B., Srdjevic, Z. & Srdjevic, B. Reference Point Approach for Multi-objective Assessment and Reduction of Ground-Level O3 Air Quality Monitoring Network in Vojvodina Province, Serbia. Environ Model Assess 22, 491–501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9560-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9560-8

Keywords