Environmental Modeling & Assessment

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 307–322 | Cite as

The Carbon Tax, Ageing and Pension Deficits

Article

Abstract

Ageing increases the income of a carbon tax ceteris paribus since energy consumption rises with age, as macro and micro data show. Ageing also increases some public expenditures, notably those of pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems. Accordingly, there may be a case for recycling a carbon tax in an ageing context so as to finance ageing-related public expenditures. This article studies the interacting effects on intergenerational equity and growth of such a recycling. It relies on a general equilibrium model with overlapping generations parameterised with empirical data. Several results emerge. Implementing a carbon tax fully recycled through higher lump-sum pensions weighs relatively more on the intertemporal welfare of young and future generations. A carbon tax fully recycled through lower social contributions financing the PAYG bolsters the wellbeing of young and future generations but weighs on the welfare of baby-boomers and older cohorts. The redistributive effects of recycling a carbon tax can depend significantly on the way used to balance the PAYG regime.

Keywords

Carbon tax Intergenerational redistribution Overlapping generations PAYG pension reform General equilibrium 

Supplementary material

10666_2015_9482_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (228 kb)
(PDF 228 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Auerbach, A., & Kotlikoff, L. (1987). Dynamic fiscal policy: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bovenberg, A.L. (1999). Green tax reforms and the double dividend: an updates reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Financ, 6, 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bovenberg, A.L., & Goulder, L. (1996). Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review, 86(4), 985–1000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bovenberg, A.L., & Goulder, L.H. (2002). Environmental taxation In A. Auerbach, & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, North Holland, pp. 1471–1547.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. (1997). Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broer, D.P., Westerhout, E., & Bovenberg, L. (1994). Taxation, pensions and saving in a small open economy. Scandinavian journal of economics, 96(3).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J.M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: economics and demographics. European Economic Review, 56, 931–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carbone, J.C., Morgenstern, R.D., Williams, R., & Burtraw, D. (2013). Deficit reduction and carbon taxes: budgetary, economic, and distributional impacts. Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiroleu-Assouline, M., & Fodha, M. (2006). Double-dividend hypothesis, golden rule and welfare distribution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, L.G., & Zin, S.E. (1991). Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: an empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 99.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goulder, L. (1994). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, August 1995, 2(2), 157–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goulder, L. (1995). Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Part 1 November 1995, 29(3), 271–97.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gourinchard, P.-O., & Parker, J. (2002). Consumption over the life-cycle. Econometrica, 70(1).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hogan, W., & Manne, A. (1977). Energy economy interactions: the Fable of the Elephant and the Rabbit? In Hitch, C.J. (Ed.), Modeling energy-economy interactions: five approaches, Resources for the Future, Washington.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knopf, B., Edenhofer, O., Flachsland, C., Kok, M.T.J., Lotze-Campen, H., Luderer, G., Popp, A., & van Vuuren, D.P. (2010). Managing the low-carbon transition—from model results to policies. The Energy Journal, 31(1).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotlikoff, L., & Spivak, A. (1981). The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of political economy, 89(2).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leimbach, M., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Lüken, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2010). Technological change and international trade–insights from REMIND-R. The Energy Journal, 31(1).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    John, A., Pecchenino, R., Schimmelpfennig, D., & Schreft, S. (1995). Short-lived agents and the long-lived environment. Journal of Public Economics, 58, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miles, D. (1999). Modelling the impact of demographic change upon the economy. The Economic Journal, 109(452).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nuclear Energy Agency (2012). Nuclear energy and renewables—system effects in low-carbon electricity systems, NEA/OECD.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Normandin, M., & St-Amour, P. (1998). Substitution, risk aversion, taste shocks and equity premia. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    OECD (2005). The impact of ageing on demand, factor markets and growth. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 420.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rasmussen, T. (2003). Modeling the economics of greenhouse gas abatement: an overlapping generations perspective. Review of Economic Dynamics, 6, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rausch, S. (2013). Fiscal consolidation and climate policy: an overlapping generations perspective. Energy Economics, 40, S134–S148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Solow, R. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, Special Issue, 41(128).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tonn, B., & Eisenberg, J. (2007). The ageing US population and residential energy demand. Energy Policy, 35, 743–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Uzawa, H. (1961). Neutral inventions and the stability of growth equilibrium. Review of economic studies, 28 (2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CGEMP/LEDaUniversity Paris-DauphineParis cedex 16France

Personalised recommendations