Abstract
We address the problem of optimal selection of sites to constitute a nature reserve which ensures that a given set of species has fixed survival probabilities. This classic problem has already been considered in the literature of conservation biology. The originality of this article is to consider that the values of the survival probabilities of each species in each potential site may be subject to a certain error while assuming that the number of sites where these probabilities are wrong is limited. We thus define a set of possible survival probability values in each site. We then show how to determine, by solving a relatively simple mixed-integer linear program, an optimal robust reserve, i.e., a reserve which ensures that each species has a certain survival probability whatever the values taken by the survival probabilities in each site, in the set of possible values. The fact of being able to formulate the search for an optimal robust reserve by a mixed-integer linear program provides an easy way to take into account additional constraints on the selection of sites such as, for example, spatial constraints. We report some computational experiments carried out on many hypothetical landscapes to illustrate the concept of robust reserve and show the effectiveness of the approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, J. L., Haight, R. G., Montgomery, C. A., & Polasky, S. (2002). Analysis of the threshold and expected coverage approaches to the probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 7, 81–89.
Arthur, J. L., Camm, J. D., Haight, R. G., Montgomery, C. A., & Polasky, S. (2004). Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection. Ecological Applications, 14, 1936–1945.
Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52, 35–53.
Billionnet, A. (2011). Solving the probabilistic reserve selection problem. Ecological Modelling, 222, 546–554.
Camm, J. D., Norman, S. K., Polasky, S., & Solow, A. R. (2002). Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Operations Research, 50, 946–955.
Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M., & Davis, F. W. (1996). Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation, 76, 105–112.
Collinge, S. K. (2000). Effects of grassland fragmentation on insect species loss, colonization, and movement patterns. Ecology, 81, 2211–2226.
Conrad, J. M., Gomes, C. P., van Hoeve, W. J., Sabharwal, A., & Suter, J. F. (2012). Wildlife corridors as a connected subgraph problem. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63, 1–18.
CPLEX. (2013). IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.5 Reference Manual.
Crist, M. (2004). Landscape connectivity: an essential element of land management. Science and Policy Brief. Washington: The Wilderness Society.
Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P., Pressey, R., Camm, J., Kershaw, M., Kiester, R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M., & Sahr, K. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation, 80, 83–97.
Drechsler, M. (2005). Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection. Biological Conservation, 122, 253–262.
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487–515.
Fischer, D. T., & Church, R. L. (2003). Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science, 49, 555–565.
Fischer, D. T., & Church, R. L. (2005). The SITES reserve selection system: a critical review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10, 215–228.
Fourer, R., Gay, D. M., & Kernighan, B. W. (1993). AMPL, a modeling language for mathematical programming. Danvers, USA: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.
Haight, R. G., ReVelle, C. S., & Snyder, S. A. (2000). An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Operations Research, 48, 697–708.
Haight, R. G., & Travis, L. E. (2008). Reserve design to maximize species persistence. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 13, 243–253.
Harrison, S., & Bruna, E. (1999). Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography, 22, 225–232.
Helzer, C. J., & Jelinski, D. E. (1999). The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland and breeding birds. Ecological Applications, 9, 1448–1458.
Jafari, N., & Hearne, J. (2013). A new method to solve the fully connected Reserve Network Design Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 202–209.
Juutinen, A., & Mönkkönen, M. (2007). Alternative targets and economic efficiency of selecting protected areas for biodiversity conservation in boreal forest. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37, 713–732.
Memtsas, D. P. (2003). Multiobjective programming methods in the reserve selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 640–652.
Moilanen, A., Runge, M., Elith, J., Tyre, A., Carmel, Y., Fegraus, E., Wintle, B., Burgman, M., & Ben-Haim, Y. (2006). Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis. Ecological Modelling, 199, 115–124.
Moilanen, A., Wilson, K.A., & Possingham, H.P. (Eds), 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization. Oxford University Press.
Ohman, K., & Lamas, T. (2005). Reducing forest fragmentation in long-term forest planning by using the shape index. Forest Ecology and Management, 212, 346–357.
Önal, H., & Yanprechaset, P. (2007). Site accessibility and prioritization of nature reserves. Ecological Economics, 60, 763–773.
Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., Solow, A. R., Csuti, B., White, D., & Ding, R. (2000). Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biological Conservation, 94, 1–10.
Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., & Garber-Yonts, B. (2001). Selection biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics, 77, 68–78.
Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P., & Margules, C. R. (1996). Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much? Biological Conservation, 76, 259–267.
ReVelle, C. S., Williams, J. C., & Boland, J. J. (2002). Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 7, 71–80.
Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2002). Optimisation in reserve selection procedures—why not? Biological Conservation, 107, 123–129.
Rosing, K. E., ReVelle, C. S., & Williams, J. C. (2002). Maximizing species representation under limited resources: a new and efficient heuristic. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 7, 91–98.
Sarkar, S., Pappas, C., Garson, J., Aggarwal, A., & Cameron, S. (2004). Place prioritization for biodiversity conservation using probabilistic surrogate distribution data. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 125–133.
Strange, N., Thorsen, B. J., & Bladt, J. (2006). Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world. Biological Conservation, 131, 33–41.
Toth, S. F., Haight, R. G., & Rogers, L. W. (2011). Dynamic reserve selection: optimal land retention with land-price feedbacks. Operations Research, 59, 1059–1078.
Tóth, S. F., Haight, R. G., Snyder, S. A., George, S., Miller, J. R., Gregory, M. S., & Skibbe, A. M. (2009). Reserve selection with minimum contiguous area restrictions: an application to open space protection planning in suburban Chicago. Biological Conservation, 142, 1617–1627.
Williams, P. H., & Araujo, M. B. (2000). Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 1959–1966.
Williams, J. C., ReVelle, C. S., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10, 163–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Billionnet, A. Designing Robust Nature Reserves Under Uncertain Survival Probabilities. Environ Model Assess 20, 383–397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-014-9437-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-014-9437-z