Landscape connectivity is an important consideration in understanding and reasoning about ecological systems. Two features within a landscape can be viewed as connected whenever a path exists between them. In many applications, the relevance of a potential path is assessed relative to the cost or resistance it presents to traversal. Typically, the least-cost paths between landscape features are used to approximate the potential for connectivity. However, traversal of a landscape between two locations may not necessarily conform to a least-cost path. Moreover, recent research has begun to cast some doubt on the how different types of landscape features may influence movement. Thus, it is important to consider the geographic bounds to movement more broadly. Continuous (i.e., raster) and discrete (i.e., vector) representations of connectivity are commonly used to model the spatial relationships among landscape features. While existing approaches can shed meaningful insights on system topology and connectivity, they are still limited in their ability to represent certain types of movement and are heavily influenced by scale of the areal units and how cost of landscape traversal is derived. In order to better address these issues, this paper proposes a new vector-based approach for delineating the geographic extent of corridors and assessing connectivity among landscape features. The developed approach is applied to evaluate habitat connectivity for salamanders to highlight the benefits of this modeling approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., & Matthysen, E. (2003). The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 233–247.
Amoros, C., & Bornette, G. (2002). Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biology, 47, 761–776.
Arscott, D. B., Tockner, K., & Ward, J. V. (2001). Thermal heterogeneity along a braided floodplain river (Tagliamento River, Northeastern Italy). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(12), 2359–2373.
Barrows, C. W., Fleming, K. D., & Allen, M. F. (2011). Identifying habitat linkages to maintain connectivity for corridor dwellers in a fragmented landscape. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75(3), 682–690.
Beier, P., Majka, D. R., & Newell, S. L. (2009). Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecological Applications, 19(8), 2067–2077.
Beier, P., Spencer, W., Baldwin, R. F., & McRae, B. H. (2011). Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology, 25(5), 879–892.
Berven, K. A., & Grudzien, T. A. (1990). Disperal in the wood frog (rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution, 44(8), 2047–2056.
Brost, B. M., & Beier, P. (2012). Comparing linkage designs based on land facets to linkage designs based on focal species. PLOS ONE, 7(11), e48965.
Cabezas, A., Gonzalez-Sanchis, M., Gallardo, B., & Comin, F. A. (2011). Using continuous surface water level and temperature data to characterize hydrological connectivity in riparian wetlands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 184, 485–500.
Chetkiewicz, C.-L. B., & Boyce, M. S. (2009). Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. Journal of Applied Ecology., 46, 1036–1047.
Church, R.L., & Murray. A.T. (2008). Business site selection, location analysis and GIS. Wiley
Clean Water Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (2013).
Compton, B. W., McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., & Gamble, L. R. (2007). A resistant-kernal model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conservation Biology, 21(3), 788–799.
Cosentino, B. J., Schooley, R. L., & Phillips, C. A. (2011). Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landscape Ecology, 26(3), 371–379.
Cushman, S. A. (2006). Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation, 128(2), 231–240.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271.
Diaz-Ramirez, J.N., McAnally, W.H. & Martin, J.L. (2010). A review of HSPF evaluations on the southern united states and puerto rico. ASABE—21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment, 177–184.
Gamble, L. R., McGarigal, K., & Compton, B. W. (2007). Fidelity and dispersal in the pond-breeding amphibian, Ambystoma opacum: Implications for spatial-temporal population dynamics and conservation. Biological Conservation, 139, 247–257.
Gurrutxaga, M., Lozano, P. J., & del Barrio, G. (2010). GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18, 318–326.
Hanski, I. (1999). Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos, 87, 209–219.
Huber, D.L. (1980). Alternative methods in corridor routing. Unpublished Master Thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Huck, M., Jedrzejewski, W., Borowik, T., Milosz-Cielma, M., Schmidt, K., Jedrezejewska, B., Nowak, S., & Myslajek, R. W. (2010). Habitat suitability, corridors and dispersal barriers for large carnivores in Poland. Acta Theriologica, 55(2), 177–192.
Kautz, R., Kawula, R., Hoctor, T., Comiskey, J., Jansen, D., Jennings, D., Kasbohm, J., Mazzotti, F., McBride, R., Richardson, L., & Root, K. (2006). How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the florida panther. Biological Conservation, 130(1), 118–133.
LaRue, M. A., & Nielsen, C. K. (2008). Modeling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in Midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecological Modeling, 212, 372–381.
Levin, S. A. (1991). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967.
Lookingbill, T. R., Gardner, R. H., Rerrari, J. R., & Keller, C. E. (2010). Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. Ecological Applications., 20(2), 427–441.
Lombard, K., & Church, R. L. (1993). The gateway shortest path problem: generating alternative routes for a corridor location problem. Geographical Systems., 1, 25–45.
Matisziw, T. C., & Murray, A. T. (2009). Connectivity change in habitat networks. Landscape Ecology, 24, 89–100.
MDC. (2012). Wetland Values, Conservation Commission of Missouri http://mdc.mo.gov/landwater-care/wetlands-management/wetland-values (accessed 01/07/2012 2012).
McRae, B. H., Hall, S. A., Beier, P., & Theobald, D. M. (2012). Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. PLOS ONE, 7(12), e52604.
Mortelliti, A., & Boitani, L. (2008). Interaction of food resources and landscape structure in determining the probability of patch use by carnivores in fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 23, 285–298.
Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. In Concepts and techniques in modern geography, Volume 8. Norwich: Geobooks.
Parks, S. A., McKelvey, K. S., & Schwartz, M. K. (2012). Effects of weighting schemes on the identification of wildlife corridors generated with least-cost methods. Conservation Biology, 27(1), 145–154.
Pinto, N., & Keitt, T. (2009). Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecology, 24, 253–266.
Pittman, S. E., Osbourn, M. S., & Semlitsch, R. D. (2014). Movement ecology of amphibians: a missing component to understanding amphibian declines. Biological Conservation, 169, 44–53.
Poor, E. E., Loucks, C., Jakes, A., & Urban, D. L. (2012). Comparing habitat suitability and connectivity modeling methods for conserving pronghorn migrations. PLOS ONE, 7(11), e49390.
Pyke, C. R. (2005). Assessing suitability for conservation action: prioritizing interpond linkages for the California tiger salamander. Conservation Biology., 19(2), 492–503.
Rapanos v. United States, (2006) 547. U. 715. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-1034.ZS.html.
Rentch, J. S., Anderson, J. T., Lamont, S., Sencindiver, J., & Eli, R. (2008). Vegetation along hydrologic, edaphic, and geochemical gradients in a high-elevation poor fen in Canaan Valley, West Virginia. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16(3), 237–253.
Ribeiro, R., Carretero, M., Sillero, N., Alarcos, G., Ortiz-Santaliestra, M., Lizana, M., & Llorente, G. A. (2011). The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? Landscape Ecology, 26(5), 673–682.
Ricketts, T. H. (2001). The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist, 158(1), 87–99.
Rouget, M., Cowling, R. M., Lombard, A. T., Knight, A. T., & Graham, I. H. K. (2006). Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conservation Biology, 20, 549–561.
Samecka-Cymerman, A., Stankiewicz, A., Kolon, K., Kempers, A. J., & Leuven, R. S. E. W. (2010). Market basket analysis: a new tool in ecology to describe chemical relations in the environment—a case study of the fern athyrium distentifolium in the Tatra National Park in Poland. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36(9), 1029–1034.
Sawyer, S. C., Epps, C. W., & Brashares, J. S. (2011). Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 668–678.
Semlitsch, R. D., Ecrement, S., Fuller, A., Hammer, K., Howard, J., Krager, C., Mozeley, J., Ogle, J., Shipman, N., Speier, J., Walker, M., & Walters, B. (2012). Natural and anthropogenic substrates affect movement behavior of the Southern Graycheek salamander (Plethodon metcalfi). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 90, 1128–1135.
Semlitsch, R. D., & Bodie, J. R. (1998). Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology, 12, 1129–1133.
Semlitsch, R. D. (2008). Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(1), 260–267.
Semlitsch, R. D., Ryan, T. J., Hamed, K., Chatfield, M., Drehman, B., Pekarek, N., Spath, M., & Watland, A. (2007). Salamander abundance along road edges and within abandoned logging roads in appalachian forests. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 159–167.
Schalk, C. M., & Luhring, T. M. (2010). Vagility of aquatic salamanders: implications for wetland connectivity. Journal of Herpetology, 44(1), 104–109.
Shulse, C. D., Semlitsch, R. D., Trauth, K. M., & Williams, A. D. (2010). Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands, 30, 915–928.
Smith, M. A., & Green, D. M. (2005). Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28(1), 110–128.
Snodgrass, J. W., Ackerman, J. W., Bryan, A. L., Jr., & Burger, J. (1999). Influence of hydroperiod, isolation, and heterospecifics on the distribution of aquatic salamanders (Siren and Amphiuma) among depression wetlands. Copeia, 1, 107–113.
Todd, B. L., Matheney, M.P., Lobb, M.D. & Schrader L.H. (1994). Locust creek basin management plan.
Urban, D., & Keitt, T. (2001). Landscape connectivity: a graph theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82(5), 1205–1218.
USFWS. (2012). Wetlands Mapper Documentation and Instructions Manual. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Documents/Wetlands-Mapper-Instructions-Manual.pdf (accessed 04/23/2012).
Verbeylen, G., De Bruyn, L., Adriaensen, F., & Matthysen, E. (2003). Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18, 791–805.
Whiles, M. R., Lips, K. R., Pringle, C. M., Kilham, S. S., Bixby, R. J., Brenes, R., Connelly, S., Colon-Gaud, J. C., Hunte-Brown, M., Huryn, A. D., Montgomery, C., & Peterson, S. (2006). The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(1), 27–34.
Wien, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3, 385–397.
This research has been supported by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 7. Although the research described in the article has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 through grant CD-97723401, it has not been subjected to any EPA review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
About this article
Cite this article
Matisziw, T.C., Alam, M., Trauth, K.M. et al. A Vector Approach for Modeling Landscape Corridors and Habitat Connectivity. Environ Model Assess 20, 1–16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-014-9412-8