Advertisement

Environmental Modeling & Assessment

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 271–282 | Cite as

Integrated Traffic and Emission Simulation: a Model Calibration Approach Using Aggregate Information

  • Xiaoliang MaEmail author
  • Zhen Huang
  • Haris Koutsopoulos
Article

Abstract

Environmental impacts of road traffic have attracted increasing attention in project-level traffic planning and management. The conventional approach considers emission impact analysis as a separate process in addition to traffic modeling. This paper first introduces our research effort to integrate traffic, emission, and dispersion processes into a common distributed computational framework, which makes it efficient to quantify and analyze correlations among dynamic traffic conditions, emission impacts, and air quality consequences. A model calibration approach is particularly proposed when on-road or in-lab instantaneous emission measurements are not directly available. Microscopic traffic simulation is applied to generate dynamic vehicle states at the second-by-second level. Using aggregate emission estimation as standard reference, a numerical optimization scheme on the basis of a stochastic gradient approximation algorithm is applied to find optimal parameters for the dynamic emission model. The calibrated model has been validated on several road networks with traffic states generated by the same simulation model. The results show that with proper formulation of the optimization objective function, the estimated dynamic emission model can capture the trends of aggregate emission patterns of traffic fleets and predict local emission and air quality at higher temporal and spatial resolutions.

Keywords

Vehicle emission Traffic pollution Integrated modeling Emission models Model calibration SPSA Traffic simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Swedish Transport Administration (MEMFIS project) and J. Gustav. Richert Stiftelse (MOPED project) for their support on the emission modeling study. The study on integrated traffic and emission simulation was funded by the Swedish National Energy Agency through the Basic Energy Research programme of the Swedish Research Council.

References

  1. 1.
    EPA (2002). Users guide to MOBILE 6.0: mobile source emission factor model. Technical report EPA420-R-02-001. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ntziachristos, L., & Samaras, Z. (2000). Copert III: computer programme to calculate emissions from road transport. Technical report 49. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hausberger, S., Rexeis, M., Zallinger, M., Luz, R. (2009). Emission factors from the model PHEM for the HBEFA version 3. Technical report, Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics. Graz University of Technology.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keller, M., & Kljun, N. (2007). ARTEMIS road emission model—model description. Zurich: INFRAS.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sjödin, A., & Jerksjö, M. (2008). Evaluation of European road transport emission models against on-road emission data as measured by optical remote sensing. In: 17th International transport and air pollution conference.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barth, M., An, F., Younglove, T., Scora, G., Levine, C., Ross, M., Wenzel, T. (2000). Development of a comprehensive modal emissions model. Final report project 25–11. Washington: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rakha, H., Ahn, K., Trani, A. (2004). Development of VT-Micro model for estimating hot-stabilized light duty vehicle and truck emissions. Transportation Research Part D, 9, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stathopoulos, F., & Noland, R. (2003). Induced travel and emissions from traffic flow improvement projects. Transportation Research Record, Journal of TRB, 1842, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevanovic, A., Stevanovic, J., Zhang, K., Batterman, S. (2009). Optimizing traffic control to reduce fuel consumption and vehicular emissions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2128, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, Z., & Ma, X. (2009). Integration of emission and fuel consumption computing with traffic simulation using a distributed framework. In: Proceedings of 12th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation system.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frey, H.C., Unal, A., Chen, J., Li, S. (2003). Modeling mobile source emissions based upon in-use and second-by-second data: development of conceptual approaches for EPA’s new moves model. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the air and waste management association, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma, X., Lei, W., Andréasson, I., Chen, H. (2012). An evaluation of microscopic emission models for traffic pollution simulation using on-board measurement. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 17(4), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spall, J. (1998). Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 34(3).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pflug, G. (1996). Optimization of stochastic models: the interface between simulation and optimization. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hill, S., Gerencsér, L., Vágó, Z. (2003). Stochastic approximation on discrete sets using simultaneous perturbation difference approximations. In: Proceedings on information science and systems.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garrett, J. (2004). Jointly optimizing model complexity and data-processing parameters with mixed-inputs. In: Computing science and statistics proceedings of the symposium on the interface.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kocsis, L., & Szepesvári, C. (2006). Universal parameter optimisation in games based on SPSA. Machine Learning, 63, 249–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spall, J. (1992). Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. IEEE Transaction on Automatic control, 37, 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Law, A.M., & Kelton, W.D. (2000). Simulation modeling and analysis, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Traffic and Logistics, Department of Transportation SciencesRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations