Abstract
Conservation planners are called upon to make choices and trade-offs about the preservation of natural areas for the protection of species in the face of development pressures. We addressed the problem of selecting sites for protection over time with the objective of maximizing species representation, with uncertainty about future site development, and with periodic constraints on the number of sites that can be selected. We developed a 0–1, linear optimization model with 2 periods to select the sites that maximize expected species coverage subject to budget constraints. The model is based on the idea that development uncertainty can be characterized by a set of scenarios, each of which is a possible second-period development outcome for the set of sites. We also suggest that our 2-period model can be used in a sequential fashion that is consistent with adaptive planning. Results are presented for the Fox River watershed in Chicago.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P.H. Gobster, R.G. Haight and D. Shriner, Landscape change in the Midwest: An integrated research and development program, Journal of Forestry 98(3) (2000) 9–14.
L.E. Hollis and W. Fulton, Open Space Protection: Conservation Meets Growth Management (The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC, 2002.
R.F. Noss and A.Y. Cooperrider, Saving Nature’s Legacy (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1994).
S.L. Pimm and J.H. Lawton, Planning for biodiversity, Science 279 (1998) 2068–2069.
A. Ando, J.D. Camm, S. Polasky and A.R. Solow, Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation, Science 279 (1998) 2126–2128.
S.E. Kingsland, Creating a science of nature reserve design: perspectives from history, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 61–69.
R.L. Pressey, C.J. Humphries, C.R. Margules, R.I. Vane-Wright and P.H. Williams, Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 (1993) 124–128.
C.R. Margules and R.L. Pressey, Systematic conservation planning, Nature 405 (2000) 243–253.
C.S. ReVelle, J.C. Williams and J.J. Boland, Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 71–80.
K.D. Cocks and I.A. Baird, Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia, Biological Conservation 49 (1989) 113–130.
J. Saetersdal, J.M. Line and H.J. Birks, How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway, Biological Conservation 66 (1993) 131–138.
J.D. Camm, S. Polasky, A. Solow and B. Csuti, A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection, Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 353–355.
R.L. Church, D.M. Stoms, and F.W. Davis, Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem, Biological Conservation 76 (1996) 105–112.
C.A. Willis, R. Lombard, B. Cowling, B. Heydenrych and C. Burgers, Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape Lowland fynbos: iterative versus linear programming techniques, Biological Conservation 77 (1996) 3–62.
J.C. Williams and C.S. ReVelle, Applying mathematical programming to reserve selection, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2 (1997) 167–175.
S.A. Snyder, L.E. Tyrrell and R.G. Haight, An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in national forests, Forest Science 45 (1999) 458–469.
S. Polasky, J.D. Camm and B. Garber-Yonts, Selecting biological reserves cost effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon, Land Economics 77 (2001) 68–78.
S.A. Malcolm and S.A. Zenios, Robust optimization for power systems capacity expansion under uncertainty, Journal of the Operational Research Society 45 (1994) 1040–1049.
J.M. Mulvey, R.J. Vanderbei and S.A. Zenios, Robust optimization of large-scale systems, Operations Research 43(2) (1995) 264–281.
P. Kouvelis and G. Yu, Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1997).
C. Costello and S. Polasky, Dynamic reserve site selection, Energy and Resource Economics (2003, in press).
K.M. Johnson, The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s, Chicago Fed Letter #176, April, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, IL (2002).
Openlands Project, Under pressure: land consumption in the Chicago region 1998–2028, Openlands Project, Chicago (1999).
J.A. Ruliffson, P.H. Gobster, R.G. Haight and F.R. Homans, Niches in the urban forest: organizations, goals, and cooperation in metropolitan open space acquisition, Journal of Forestry 100(6) (2002) 16–23.
A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1982).
GAMS Development Corporation, General Algebraic Modeling System. Version 2.25.090 (Washington, DC, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snyder, S.A., Haight, R.G. & ReVelle, C.S. A scenario optimization model for dynamic reserve site selection. Environ Model Assess 9, 179–187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-005-3799-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-005-3799-1