Skip to main content
Log in

Models for preserving species diversity with backup coverage

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of selecting land for preservation of species has been a rich and active area of research over the past two decades. Typically, reserve selection models have tried to maximize species diversity by preserving areas that contain the greatest number of species. However, several studies have shown that seldom do these species-rich areas contain the rarest species most in need of protection. Most reserve selection models seek to maximize diversity by choosing parcels so that all species are covered by or represented in at least one parcel. This approach would usually be expected to result in coverage by a single parcel for the rarest species, especially for those that do not coincide with more abundant species. It is precisely these rare species, however, that would be lost or whose survivability would be most challenged, if the single parcels in which they are represented became unavailable due to some unforeseen event. In this paper, we introduce to reserve selection models the concept of secondary, or backup, coverage of species. Briefly stated, a species is said to have backup representation in the system of reserves if it is covered by, or represented in, two or more parcels. Having backup coverage guarantees that every species is still covered in the event that a natural or man-made catastrophe makes a given parcel uninhabitable. The results show that backup coverage can be obtained at little additional cost (as expressed by the number of parcels selected). Bi-objective formulations that trade-off primary with backup coverage show that backup coverage can be guaranteed for larger numbers of species with little reduction in primary coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.R. Margules, A.O. Nicholls and R.L. Pressey, Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity, Biological Conservation 43 (1988) 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.O. Nicholls and C.R. Margules, An upgraded reserve selection algorithm, Biological Conservation 64 (1993) 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L.G. Underhill, Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms, Biological Conservation 70 (1994) 85–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.L. Church, D.M. Stoms and F.W. Davis, Reserve selection as a maximal covering problem, Biological Conservation 76 (1996) 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.R. Prendergast, R.M. Quinn, J.H. Lawton, B.C. Eversham and D.W. Gibbons, Rare species, the coincidence of hotspots and conservation strategies, Nature 365 (1993) 335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C.S. ReVelle, J. Williams and J.J. Boland, Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.L. Pimm and J.H. Lawton, Planning for biodiversity, Science 279 (1998) 2068–2069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.L. Church and R.A. Gerrard, The multi-level location set covering model, Geographical Analysis 35 (2003) 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.J. Chaplin, R.A. Gerrard, H.M. Watson, L.L. Master and S.R. Flack, The geography of imperilment: Targeting conservation toward critical biodiversity areas, in: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States, eds. L.S. Kutner, B.A. Stein and J.S. Adams (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000) pp. 159–199.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.G. Haight, C.S. ReVelle and S.A. Snyder, An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem, Operations Research 48 (2000) 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.D. Camm, S.K. Norman, S. Polasky and A.R. Solow, Nature reserve selection to maximize expected species coverage, Operations Research 50 (2002) 946–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.L. Arthur, J.D. Camm, R.G. Haight, C.A. Montgomery and S. Polasky, Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection, Ecological Applications, Forthcoming.

  13. W.H. Drury, Rare species, Biological Conservation 6(3) (1974) 162–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Possingham, M. Goldfinch and F. Salzborn, The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation, in: Proceedings of the 12th Australian Operations Research Conference, eds. D. Sutton, E. Cousins and C. Pearce (ASOR, Adelaide, 1993) pp. 536–545.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Hogan and C. ReVelle, Concepts and applications of backup coverage, Management Science 32(11) (1986) 1434–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.S. Daskin and E.N. Stern, A hierarchical objective set covering model for emergency medical service deployment, Transportation Science 15(2) (1981) 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Cohon, Multiobjective Programming and Planning (Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Csuti, S. Polasky, P.H. Williams, R.L. Pressey, J.D. Camm, M. Kershaw, A.R. Kiester, B. Downs, R. Hamilton, M. Huso and K. Sahr, A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon, Biological Conservation 80 (1997) 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ando, J. Camm, S. Polasky and A. Solow, Species distribution, land values, and efficient conservation, Science 279 (1998) 2126–2128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malcolm, S.A., ReVelle, C. Models for preserving species diversity with backup coverage. Environ Model Assess 10, 99–105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-004-5101-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-004-5101-3

Keywords

Navigation