Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical solution for the stress near a hole with corners in an infinite plate under biaxial loading

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the elastic stress near a hole with corners in an infinite plate under biaxial stress. The elasticity problem is formulated using complex Goursat functions, resulting in a set of singular integro-differential equations on the boundary. The resulting boundary integral equations are solved numerically using a Chebyshev collocation method which is augmented by a fractional power term, derived by asymptotic analysis of the corner region, to resolve stress singularities at corners of the hole. We apply our numerical method to the test case of the hole formed by two partially overlapping circles, which can include either a corner pointing into the solid or a corner pointing out of the solid. Our numerical results recover the exact stress on the boundary to within relative error \(10^{-3}\) for modest computational effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muskhelishvili NI (1953) Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity. Noordhoff, Groningen

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolosoff G (1914) On some properties of problems in the plane theory of elasticity. Z Math Physik 62:384–409

    Google Scholar 

  3. Savin GN (1970) Stress distribution around holes. NASA, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pan Z, Cheng Y, Liu J (2013) Stress analysis of a finite plate with a rectangular hole subjected to uniaxial tension using modified stress functions. Int J Mech Sci 75:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Motok MD (1997) Stress concentration on the contour of a plate opening of an arbitrary corner radius of curvature. Mar Struct 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling CB (1948) The stresses in a plate containing an overlapped circular hole. J Appl Phys 19:405–411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Driscoll TA, Trefethen LN (2002) Schwarz–Christoffel mapping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Carlo A, Gurtin ME, Podio-Guidugli P (1992) A regularized equation for anisotropic motion-by-curvature. SIAM J Appl Math 52:1111–1119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Golovin AA, Davis SH, Nepomnyashchy AA (1998) A convective Cahn–Hilliard model for the formation of facets and corners in crystal growth. Physica D 122:202–230

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurtin ME (1993) Thermomechanics of evolving phase boundaries in the plane. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel M, Miksis MJ, Voorhees PW (2004) Evolution of material voids for highly anisotropic surface energy. J Mech Phys Solids 52:1319–1353

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams ML (1952) Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension. J Appl Mech 19:526–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiu CH (2020) The model of eye-shaped voids: Elasticity solution and its applications in material failures via morphological transformation. J Mech Phys Solids 137:103822

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu CH (1982) Unconventional internal cracks, part 1: symmetric variations of a straight crack. J Appl Mech 49:62–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Burton WK, Cabrera N, Frank FC (1951) The growth of crystals and the equilibrium structure of their surfaces. Philos Trans R Soc A 243:299–358

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cabrera N (1964) The equilibrium of crystal surfaces. Surf Sci 2:320–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Srolovitz DJ, Davis SH (2001) Do stresses modify wetting angles? Acta Mater 49:1005–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikhlin SG (1957) Integral Equations. Pergamon, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalez O, Stuart AM (2008) A first course in continuum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Soutas-Little RW (1999) Elasticity. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Herring C (1951) Some theorems on the free energies of crystal surfaces. Phys Rev 82:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: the art of scientific computing, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyd JP (2001) Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Golub GH, Welsch JH (1969) Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules. Math Comput 23:221–230

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Bremer J, Gimbutas Z, Rokhlin V (2010) A nonlinear optimization procedure for generalized Gaussian quadratures. SIAM J Sci Comput 32:1761–1788

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoskins JG, Rokhlin V, Serkh K (2019) On the numerical solution of elliptic partial differential equations on polygonal domains. SIAM J Sci Comput 41:A2552–A2578

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Clenshaw CW (1955) A note on the summation of Chebyshev series. Math Comput 9:118–120

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Knops RJ, Payne LE (1971) Uniqueness theorems in linear elasticity. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Shampine LF (2008) Vectorized adaptive quadrature in MATLAB. J Comput Appl Math 211:131–140

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Epperson JF (1987) On the Runge example. Am Math Mon 94:329–341

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jeremy Hoskins for his helpful discussion on numerical aspects of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Spencer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (Award #354717, BJS)

Appendix A: Asymptotic analysis near the corner for overlapping circles case.

Appendix A: Asymptotic analysis near the corner for overlapping circles case.

Here we derive the asymptotic behavior of the stress near the corner for the overlapping circle case of Sect. 4.5. The trace of the stress tensor for the overlapping circles case is given by Eq. (63) which we write as

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{x}+\sigma _{y}=H(\xi ,\alpha )\int _{0}^{\infty }F(s,\alpha )\cos s\xi \,\mathrm {d}s, \end{aligned}$$
(67)

where

$$\begin{aligned}&H(\xi ,\alpha )=4\left( \cosh \xi -\cos \alpha \right) \sin \alpha , \end{aligned}$$
(68)
$$\begin{aligned}&F(s,\alpha )=\frac{2K-\left( N_{1}-N_{2}\right) s\left( s-\cot \alpha \coth s\alpha \right) }{\sinh 2s\alpha +s\sin 2\alpha }\cdot \sinh s\alpha \end{aligned}$$
(69)

with

$$\begin{aligned} \cosh \xi =\frac{1+\cos \alpha \cos \gamma }{\cos \alpha +\cos \gamma } \end{aligned}$$
(70)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma =\theta +\arcsin \left( \sin \theta \cos \alpha \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(71)

Here, the polar angle from the center of the circle \(\gamma \), polar angle \(\theta \), amount of overlap between the circles \(\alpha \), tensions \(N_{1}\) and \(N_{2}\) are defined as in Sect. 4.4. We use \(\alpha =2\pi /3\) as an example in this Appendix. The result can be generalized to other \(\alpha \) in \(\pi /2<\alpha <\pi \) using a similar approach as described here.

The corner location is at \(\theta =\pi /2\). As \(\theta \rightarrow \pi /2\), \(\gamma \rightarrow \pi /2+\arcsin (\cos \alpha )\). Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \cos \gamma \rightarrow \cos \left[ \pi /2+\arcsin (\cos \alpha )\right] =-\cos \alpha . \end{aligned}$$
(72)

It follows from (70) that

$$\begin{aligned} \cosh \xi \rightarrow \infty , \end{aligned}$$
(73)

which gives \(\xi \rightarrow \infty \) as \(\theta \rightarrow \pi /2\). Thus the \(\cos (s\xi )\) term in integral (67) is highly oscillatory near the corner which may cause inaccuracy of the numerical integration.

We determine the behavior of the integral near the corner by applying asymptotic analysis. Let \(\theta =\pi /2-\varepsilon \) where \(0<\varepsilon \ll 1\), then \(\cos \theta =\sin \varepsilon =\varepsilon -\varepsilon ^{3}/6+{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{5})\) and \(\sin \theta =\cos \varepsilon =1-\varepsilon ^{2}/2+{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{2})\). By Eq. (71), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \cos \gamma =\cos \theta \sqrt{1-\sin ^{2}\theta \cos ^{2}\alpha }-\sin ^{2}\theta \cos \alpha . \end{aligned}$$
(74)

Thus we have

$$\begin{aligned} \cos \gamma =-\cos \alpha +\varepsilon \sin \alpha +{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{2}). \end{aligned}$$
(75)

Substitute Eq. (75) into Eq. (70), the asymptotic approximation of \(\cosh \xi \) is

$$\begin{aligned} \cosh \xi =\frac{\text {e}^{\xi }+\text {e}^{-\xi }}{2}=\frac{1}{\varepsilon }\sin \alpha +\cos \alpha +{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ). \end{aligned}$$
(76)

Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \xi =\ln \left[ \frac{2}{\varepsilon }\sin \alpha +2\cos \alpha +{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon )\right] . \end{aligned}$$
(77)

Now consider the integral in (67). F has properties \(F(-s)=F(s)\), \(F(s)\rightarrow 0\) as \(s\rightarrow \pm \infty \) and \(F(s,\alpha )\) is bounded for all s (\(s=0\) is a removable singularity), so we can rewrite the integral on \(-\infty<s<+\infty \) as

$$\begin{aligned} I=\int _{0}^{\infty }F(s,\alpha )\cos s\xi \,\mathrm {d}s=\frac{1}{2}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }F(s,\alpha )\cos s\xi \,\mathrm {d}s. \end{aligned}$$
(78)

We evaluate I by considering the contour integral on complex plane \(z=s+\text {i}t\) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} {\tilde{I}}=\underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\int _{C}F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z} \mathrm {d}z, \end{aligned}$$
(79)

then

$$\begin{aligned} I=\frac{1}{2}\text{ Re }\left\{ {\tilde{I}}\right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(80)

where C is the line along s axis from \(-R\) to \(-R\). Note \(F(z,\alpha )\) is analytic in upper half-plane \(\text{ Im }(z)>0\) except at zeros of the denominator located by the roots of

$$\begin{aligned} \sinh 2z\alpha +z\sin 2\alpha =0. \end{aligned}$$
(81)
Fig. 21
figure 21

Contour plot of \(\left| F\right| \) on upper half-plane for \(\alpha =2\pi /3\)

Fig. 22
figure 22

Complex contour integral

There are infinitely many singularities of \(F(z,\alpha )\) on the upper half-plane (see Fig. 21). We claim that since \({\tilde{I}}\) contains \(\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z}=\text {e}^{-\xi t}\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi s}\) and \(\xi \gg 1\), the integral \({\tilde{I}}\) can be approximated by the contribution from the residual of the singularity that occurs at the location with smallest imaginary part t in the upper half-plane. For \(\alpha =2\pi /3\), as shown in Fig. 21, this first singularity lies on the imaginary axis, and so satisfies \(s=0\) and

$$\begin{aligned} \sin 2\alpha t+t\sin 2\alpha =0. \end{aligned}$$
(82)

For \(\alpha =2\pi /3\) the solution of Eq. (82) is \(t_1^*\approx 0.6157\) and the first singularity is at \(z=\text {i}t_1^*\). We construct a rectangular contour on the complex plane with the first singularity inside as in Fig. 22 to evaluate the integral (79), where C is the line segment from \(z=-R\) to \(z=R\), \(\varGamma _1\) is the line segment from \(z=R\) to \(z=R+\text {i}t_2\), \(\varGamma _2\) is the line segment from \(z=R+\text {i}t_2\) to \(z=-R+\text {i}t_2\), and \(\varGamma _3\) is the line segment from \(z=-R+\text {i}t_2\) to \(z=-R\). The height of the rectangle is defined by \(t_2=\pi /(2\alpha )>t_1^*\) such that only the first singularity is inside the contour. By the residue theorem and taking the limit \(R\rightarrow \infty \),

(83)

Now consider the integrals on \(\varGamma _1\), \(\varGamma _2\), and \(\varGamma _3\). First, on \(\varGamma _1\)

(84)

We can bound |F| in (84) using following inequalities

$$\begin{aligned}&|\sinh \alpha z|=|\sinh \alpha R\cos \alpha t+\text {i}\cosh \alpha R\sin \alpha t| \le 2|\cosh \alpha R|=|\text {e}^{\alpha R}+\text {e}^{-\alpha R}|, \end{aligned}$$
(85)
$$\begin{aligned}&|\cosh \alpha z|=|\cosh \alpha R\cos \alpha t+\text {i}\sinh \alpha R\sin \alpha t| \le 2|\cosh \alpha R|=|\text {e}^{\alpha R}+\text {e}^{-\alpha R}|, \end{aligned}$$
(86)
$$\begin{aligned}&|z|\le \sqrt{R^2+t_2^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(87)
$$\begin{aligned}&|\sinh 2\alpha z|=|\cosh 2\alpha R\cos 2\alpha t+\text {i}\sinh 2\alpha R\sin 2\alpha t|\nonumber \\&\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \ge |\sinh 2\alpha R\cos 2\alpha t+\text {i}\sinh 2\alpha R\sin 2\alpha t|\ge |\sinh 2\alpha R|. \end{aligned}$$
(88)

Then

$$\begin{aligned} \underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\left| F\right|\le & {} \underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\left[ \frac{\left[ 2\left| K\right| +\left| N_1-N_2\right| \left( R^2+t_2^2\right) \right] \left| 2\cosh (\alpha R)\right| }{|\sinh (2\alpha R)|-\sqrt{R^2+t_2^2}\left| \sin {2\alpha }\right| }\right. \nonumber \\&+ \left. \frac{\left| N_1-N_2\right| \left| \cot \alpha \right| \sqrt{R^2+t_2^2}\left| 2\cosh (\alpha R)\right| }{|\sinh (2\alpha R)|-\sqrt{R^2+t_2^2}\left| \sin {2\alpha }\right| }\right] =0. \end{aligned}$$
(89)

Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\int _{\varGamma _1}F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z} \mathrm {d}z=0. \end{aligned}$$
(90)

For the same reason,

$$\begin{aligned} \underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\int _{\varGamma _3}F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z} \mathrm {d}z=0. \end{aligned}$$
(91)

For the \(\varGamma _2\) contour

$$\begin{aligned}&\underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\left| \int _{\varGamma _2}F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z} \mathrm {d}z\right| \le \underset{R\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\int _{-R}^{R}\left| F(s+\text {i}{t_2},\alpha )\text {e}^{-\xi t_2+\text {i}\xi s}\right| \mathrm {d}s\nonumber \\&\quad \le \left\{ 2\left| K\right| \left| \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{\sinh (\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))}{\sinh (2\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))+(s+\text {i}t_2)\sin (2\alpha )} \mathrm {d}s\right| \right. \nonumber \\&\qquad +\left[ \, \left| \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{(s+\text {i}t_2)^2\sinh (\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))}{\sinh (2\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))+(s+\text {i}t_2)\sin (2\alpha )} \mathrm {d}s\right| \right. \nonumber \\&\qquad +\left. \left. \left| \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{(s+\text {i}t_2)\cot {\alpha }\cosh (\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))}{\sinh (2\alpha (s+\text {i}t_2))+(s+\text {i}t_2)\sin (2\alpha )} \mathrm {d}s \right| \, \right] \cdot \left| N_1-N_2\right| \right\} \times \text {e}^{-\xi t_2}. \end{aligned}$$
(92)

All three integrals in the square brackets of Eq. (92) are finite, so the bound on the integral on contour \(\varGamma _2\) is of order \(\text {e}^{-\xi t_2}\) for \(\xi \gg 1\).

Finally, consider the residue from the singularity:

$$\begin{aligned}&2\pi \text {i}\cdot \;\text {residue of}\;F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z}\;\text {at}\;{it_{1}}^{*} =2\pi \text {i}\underset{z\rightarrow z_{1}^{*}}{\lim }(z-z_{1}^{*})F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z}\nonumber \\&\quad =-2\pi \text {e}^{-\xi {t_{1}^{*}}}\cdot \frac{2K+\left( N_{1}-N_{2}\right) {t_{1}^{*}}\left( {t_{1}^{*}}-\cot \alpha \coth \alpha {t_{1}^{*}}\right) }{2\alpha \cos 2\alpha t_{1}^{*}+\sin 2\alpha } \times \sin \alpha {t_{1}^{*}}\sim {\mathcal {O}}\left( \text {e}^{-\xi t_1^*}\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(93)

From Eq. (77), \(\xi \gg 1\) near the corner. Then the integral on \(\varGamma _2\) is asymptotically smaller than the residue at \(z=\text {i}t_1^*\) because \(\text {e}^{-\xi t_2}\ll \text {e}^{-\xi t_1^*}\). Thus the dominant asymptotic contribution to the integral is

$$\begin{aligned} I\sim \frac{1}{2}\text{ Re }\left\{ 2\pi \text {i}\cdot \text{ residue } \text{ of } F(z,\alpha )\text {e}^{\text {i}\xi z} \text{ at } z=\text {i}t_1^*\right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(94)

Using this result in Eq. (67) we obtain

$$\begin{aligned}&\sigma _{x}+\sigma _{y}=H(\xi ,\alpha )\cdot I =4\left( \cosh \xi -\cos \alpha \right) \sin \alpha \cdot I\nonumber \\&\quad \sim -\frac{2K+\left( N_{1}-N_{2}\right) t_{1}^{*}\left( t_{1}^{*}-\cot \alpha \coth \alpha t_{1}^{*}\right) }{2\alpha \cos 2\alpha t_{1}^{*}+\sin 2\alpha } 2\pi \sin \alpha \sin \alpha t_{1}^{*}\cdot \left( \frac{2}{\varepsilon }\sin \alpha \right) ^{1-t_{1}^{*}}, \end{aligned}$$
(95)

where \(t_{1}^{*}\) is the smallest non-zero root of Eq. (82). Recalling that \(\varepsilon =\pi /2-\theta \) is the proximity to the corner, since \(t_{1}^{*}<1\), \(\sigma _{x}+\sigma _{y}\) has an integrable singularity at the corner. Note the exponent \(1-t_1^*\) matches the exponent for the singular solutions for an infinite wedge geometry [12], as Eq. (82) is equivalent to Eq. (30). More generally, for \(\pi /2<\alpha <\pi \) (cases like Fig. 13) there is an integrable singularity with \(1<t_1^*<3/2\), and for \(0<\alpha <\pi /2\) (cases like Fig. 9) there is no singularity because \(0<t_1^*<1\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Spencer, B.J. Numerical solution for the stress near a hole with corners in an infinite plate under biaxial loading. J Eng Math 127, 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-021-10104-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-021-10104-8

Keywords

Navigation