Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 114, Issue 1, pp 141–158 | Cite as

Transient thermal boundary value problems in the half-space with mixed convective boundary conditions

  • Nikolai Gorbushin
  • Vu-Hieu Nguyen
  • William J. Parnell
  • Raphaël C. Assier
  • Salah NailiEmail author


Numerous problems in thermal engineering give rise to problems with abrupt changes in boundary conditions particularly as regards structural and construction applications. There is a continual need for improved analytical and numerical techniques for the study and analysis of such canonical problems. The present work considers transient heat propagation in a two-dimensional half-space with mixed boundary conditions of the Dirichlet and the Robin (convective) type. The exact temperature field is obtained in double integral form by applying the Wiener–Hopf technique, and this integral is then efficiently evaluated numerically with the help of numerical algorithms developed for the present problem and by exploiting the properties of the integrand. The results are then compared to the numerical solutions using finite element methods, and excellent agreement is shown. Some potential application areas of the theory are also discussed, specifically in the regime where edge effects can influence thermal convection processes.


Heat convection Mixed boundary conditions Transient heat problem Wiener–Hopf technique 



This work has benefited from a French Government Grant managed by ANR within the frame of the National Program of Investments for the Future ANR-11- LABX-022-01 (LabEx MMCD Project). W.J.P. is grateful to the EPSRC for his Fellowship Award EP/L018039/1.


  1. 1.
    Almond D, Lau S (1994) Defect sizing by transient thermography. I. An analytical treatment. J Phys D 27(5):1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maldague X, Marinetti S (1996) Pulse phase infrared thermography. J Appl Phys 79(5):2694–2698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caflisch R, Keller J (1981) Quench front propagation. Nucl Eng Des 65(1):97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levine H (1982) On a mixed boundary value problem of diffusion type. Appl Sci Res 39(4):261–276MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sahu S, Das P, Bhattacharyya S (2015) Analytical and semi-analytical models of conduction controlled rewetting: a state of the art review. Therm Sci 19(5):1479–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Satapathy A (2009) Wiener–Hopf solution of rewetting of an infinite cylinder with internal heat generation. Heat Mass Transf 45(5):651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lévêque A (1928) Les Lois de la transmission de chaleur par convection. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu T, Campbell B, Sullivan J (1994) Surface temperature of a hot film on a wall in shear flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 37(17):2809–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang D, Tarbell J (1993) An approximate solution for the dynamic response of wall transfer probes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36(18):4341–4349CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Springer S (1974) The solution of heat-transfer problems by the Wiener–Hopf technique II. Trailing edge of a hot film. Proc R Soc Lond A 337(1610):395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Springer S, Pedley T (1973) The solution of heat transfer problems by the Wiener–Hopf technique. I. Leading edge of a hot film. Proc R Soc Lond A 333(1594):347–362MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noble B (1988) Methods based on the Wiener–Hopf technique for the solution of partial differential equations. Chelsea Publ Co., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parnell W, Nguyen VH, Assier R, Naili S, Abrahams I (2016) Transient thermal mixed boundary value problems in the half-space. J Appl Math (SIAM) 76(3):845–866MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Hoop A (1959) The surface line source problem. Appl Sci Res B 8(349–356):1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Hoop A, Oristaglio M (1988) Application of the modified Cagniard technique to transient electromagnetic diffusion problems. Geophys J 94(3):387–397CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piccolroaz A, Mishuris G, Movchan A (2009) Symmetric and skew-symmetric weight functions in 2D perturbation models for semi-infinite interfacial cracks. J Mech Phys Solids 57(9):1657–1682MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hecht F (2012) New development in FreeFEM++. J Numer Math 20(3–4):251–266MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schanz M, Antes H (1997) Application of ’operational quadrature methods’ in time domain boundary element methods. Meccanica 32(3):179–186CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorbushin N (2017) Analysis of admissible steady-state fracture processes in discrete lattice structures. PhD Thesis, Aberystwyth UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feller W (1971) An introduction to probability theory, vol II. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heinze J (1993) Ultramicroelectrodes in electrochemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 32(9):1268–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rajendran L, Sangaranarayanan M (1999) Diffusion at ultramicro disk electrodes: chronoamperometric current for steady-state Ec’ reaction using scattering analogue techniques. J Phys Chem B 103(9):1518–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Del Barrio E (1998) Analysis of the green roofs cooling potential in buildings. Energy Build 27(2):179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar R, Kaushik S (2005) Performance evaluation of green roof and shading for thermal protection of buildings. Build Environ 40(11):1505–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nowacki W (2013) Thermoelasticity. Elsevier, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zimmerman R (2000) Coupling in poroelasticity and thermoelasticity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(1–2):79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Modélisation et Simulation Multi EchelleUniversité Paris-EstCedexFrance
  2. 2.School of MathematicsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations