Skip to main content
Log in

Realization of non-holonomic constraints and singular perturbation theory for plane dumbbells

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the dynamics of pairs of connected masses in the plane when non-holonomic (knife-edge) constraints are realized by forces of viscous friction, in particular its relation to constrained dynamics, and its approximation by the method of matching asymptotics of singular perturbation theory when the mass-to-friction ratio is taken as the small parameter. It turns out that long-term behaviors of the frictional and constrained systems may differ dramatically no matter how small the perturbation is, and when this happens is not determined by any transparent feature of the equations of motion. The choice of effective time scales for matching asymptotics is also subtle and non-obvious, and secular terms appearing in them cannot be dealt with by the classical methods. Our analysis is based on comparison to analytic solutions, and we present a reduction procedure for plane dumbbells that leads to them in some cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borisov A, Mamaev I (2002) On the history of the development of the nonholonomic dynamics. Regul Chaotic Dyn 7(1):43–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis A, Murray R (1995) Variational principles for constrained systems: theory and experiment. Int J Non-Linear Mech 30(6):793–815

  3. Marle C-M (1998) Various approaches to conservative and nonconservative nonholonomic systems. Rep Math Phys 42(1–2):211–229

  4. Greenwood D (1998) Advanced dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benenti S (2008) A general method for writing the dynamical equations of nonholonomic systems with ideal constraints. Regul Chaotic Dyn 13(4):283–315

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zekovich D (1993) On the motion of an integrable system with a nonlinear nonholonomic constraint. Mosc Univ Math Bull 48(1):37–41

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Carathéodory C (1933) Der Schlitten. Z Angew Math Mech 13(2):71–76

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fufaev N (1964) On the possibility of realizing a nonholonomic constraint by means of viscous friction forces. J Appl Math Mech 28(3):630–632

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Neimark J, Fufaev N (1972) Dynamics of nonholonomic systems. Translations of mathematical monographs 33. American Mathematical Society, Providence

  10. Brendelev A (1981) On the realization of constraints in nonholonomic mechanics. J Appl Math Mech 45(3):481–487

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karapetian A (1981) On realizing nonholonomic constraints by viscous friction forces and Celtic stones stability. J Appl Math Mech 45(1):30–36

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold V, Kozlov V, Neishtadt A (2006) Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics. [Dynamical systems III]. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 3. Springer, Berlin

  13. Kozlov V (1983) Realization of nonintegrable constraints in classical mechanics. Sov Phys Dok 28:735–737

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Eldering J (2016) Realizing nonholonomic dynamics as limit of friction forces. Reg Chaotic Dyn 21(4):390–409

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenichel N (1972) Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows. Indiana Univ Math J 21(3):193–226

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Deppler J, Braun B, Fidlin A, Hochbruck M (2016) Convergence of viscoelastic constraints to nonholonomic idealization. Eur J Mech A Solids 58:140–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Verhülst F (2005) Methods and applications of singular perturbations. Texts in applied mathematics, vol 50. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes M (1995) Introduction to perturbation methods. Texts in applied mathematics, vol 20. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hek G (2010) Geometric singular perturbation theory in biological practice. J Math Biol 60:347–386

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zagaris A, Kaper H, Kaper T (2003) Analysis of the computational singular perturbation reduction method for chemical kinetics. J Nonlinear Sci 14(1):59–91

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bahar L (1998) A non-linear non-holonomic formulation of the Appell–Hamel problem. Int J Nonlinear Mech 33(1):67–83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Koiller J (1992) Reduction of some classical nonholonomic systems with symmetry. Arch Ration Mech Anal 118(2):113–148

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Korenev B (2002) Bessel functions and their applications. Analytical methods and special functions, vol 8. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Jaap Eldering for multiple suggestions and corrections during the preparation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vojin Jovanovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koshkin, S., Jovanovic, V. Realization of non-holonomic constraints and singular perturbation theory for plane dumbbells. J Eng Math 106, 123–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-017-9896-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-017-9896-8

Keywords

Navigation