Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

Complex material flow problems: a multi-scale model hierarchy and particle methods

Article

Abstract

Material flow simulation is in increasing need of multi-scale models. On the one hand, macroscopic flow models are used for large-scale simulations with a large number of parts. On the other hand, microscopic models are needed to describe the details of the production process. In this paper, we present a hierarchy of models for material flow problems ranging from detailed microscopic, discrete element method type, models to macroscopic models using scalar conservation laws with non-local interaction terms. Numerical simulations are presented at all levels of the hierarchy, and the results are compared to each other for several test cases.

Keywords

DEM material flow simulation Diffusive limits Hydrodynamic limits Interacting particles  Mean field equations 

References

  1. 1.
    Hoher S, Schindler P, Göttlich S, Schleper V, Röck S (2011) System dynamic models and real-time simulation of complex material flow systems. In: ElMaraghy HA (ed) Enabling manufacturing competitiveness and economic sustainability 2012, Part 3, pp 316–321Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jahangirian M, Eldabi T, Naseer A, Stergioulas LK, Young T (2012) Simulation in manufacturing and business: a review. Eur J Oper Res 203:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reinhart G, Lacour F (2009) Physically based virtual commissioning of material flow intensive manufacturing plants. In: Zaeh MF, ElMaraghy HA (eds) 3rd international conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual production (CARV 2009), pp 377–387Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleary PW, Sawley ML (2002) DEM modeling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge. Appl Math Model 26:89–111CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lätzel M, Luding S, Hermann HJ (2000) Macroscopic material properties from quasi-static, microscopic simulations of a two-dimensional shear-cell. Granular Matter 2:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell CS (1990) Rapid granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 22:57–92CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Göttlich S, Hoher S, Schindler P, Schleper V, Verl A (2014) Modeling, simulation and validation of material flow on conveyor belt. Appl Math Model 38:3295–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jeffrey DJ, Chepurniy N (1984) Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield. J Fluid Mech 140:223–256CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carrillo JA, D’Orsogna MR, Panferov V (2009) Double milling in self-propelled swarms from kinetic theory. Kinet. Relat. Models 2:363–378CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Etikyala R, Göttlich S, Klar A, Tiwari S (2014) Particle methods for pedestrian flow models: from microscopic to non-local continuum models. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24:2503–2523CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colombo R, Garavello M, Lecureux-Mercier M (2012) A class of non-local models for pedestrian traffic. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1150023CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babic M (1997) Average balance equations for granular materials. Int J Eng Sci 35:523–548CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu HP, Yu AB (2002) Averaging method of granular materials. Phys Rev E 66:021302CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu HP, Yu AB (2005) Micromechanic modeling and analysis of unsteady-state granular flow in a cylindrical hopper. J Eng Math 52:307–320CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Braun W, Hepp K (1977) The Vlasov dynamics and its fluctuations in the 1/N limit of interacting classical particles. Commun Math Phys 56:101–113Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neunzert H (1977) The Vlasov equation as a limit of Hamiltonian classical mechanical systems of interacting particles. Trans Fluid Dyn 18:663–678Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cañizo JA, Carrillo JA, Rosado J (2011) A well-posedness theory in measures for some kinetic models of collective motion. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 21:515–539CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chuang YL, D’Orsogna MR, Marthaler D, Bertozzi AL, Chayes L (2007) State transitions and the continuum limit for a 2D interacting, self-propelled particle system. Phys D 232:33–47CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Topaz CM, Bertozzi AL (2004) Swarming patterns in a two-dimensional kinematic model for biological groups. SIAM J Appl Math 65:152–174CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang F, Marcati P, Pan R (2005) Convergence to the Barenblatt solution for the compressible Euler equations with damping and vacuum. Arch Ration Mech Anal 176:1–24CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiwari S, Kuhnert J (2007) Modelling of two-phase flow with surface tension by finite point-set method (FPM). J Comp Appl Math 203:376–386CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klar A, Tiwari S (2014) A multi-scale meshfree particle method for macroscopic mean field interacting particle models. Multiscale Model Simul 12:11671192CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Degond P, Mustieles FJ (1990) Approximation of diffusion equations by deterministic convections of particles. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 11(2):293–310CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aronson DG (1969) Regularity properties of flows through porous media. SIAM J Appl Math 17:461–467CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute ITWMFraunhofer-Platz 1KaiserslauternGermany
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsTU KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations