Skip to main content

Wavefunction delocalization in quantum dot arrays: an asymptotic analysis

Journal of Engineering Mathematics volume 81, pages 191–211 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Intermediate-band solar cells using quantum dot arrays (QDAs) are theoretically predicted to significantly increase the efficiency with which solar energy can be harvested. In the limit of identical quantum dots, the wavefunction for electrons in a QDA will be fully delocalized. Fully delocalized wavefunctions have been theoretically shown to reduce thermal losses and consequently increase photovoltaic device efficiency. However, even small nonuniformities can cause electrons to localize in a single quantum dot, negating any advantages from delocalized states. In this work a modified Schrödinger equation is used to model a two-dot array with nonuniform quantum dots and solved using perturbation methods. This result is extended to N-dot arrays, and several metrics are constructed to characterize the degree of delocalization. Our results, which compare favorably with numerical simulations, show explicitly how the amount of delocalization depends on key design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Lopez N, Reichertz LA, Yu KM, Campman K, Walukiewicz W (2011) Engineering the electronic band structure for multiband solar cells. Phys Rev Lett 106: 028701

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luque A, Marti A (1997) Increasing the efficiency of ideal solar cells by photon induced transitions at intermediate levels. Phys Rev Lett 78: 5014–5017

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luque A, Marti A (2010) The intermediate band solar cell: progress toward the realization of an attractive concept. Adv Mater 22: 160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey CG, Forbes DV, Raffaelle RP, Hubbard SM (2011) Near 1 v open circuit voltage InAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 98: 163105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luque A, Linares PG, Antolin E, Canovas E, Farmer CD, Stanley CR, Marti A (2010) Multiple levels in intermediate band solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 96: 013501

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Antolin E, Marti A, Olea J, Pastor D, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Martil I, Luque A (2009) Lifetime recovery in ultrahighly titanium-doped silicon for the implementation of an intermediate band material. Appl Phys Lett 94: 042115

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luque A, Marti A, Antolin E, Tablero C (2006) Intermediate bands versus levels in nonradiative recombination. Physica B 382: 320–327

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomic S (2010) Intermediate-band solar cells: Influence of band formation on dynamical processes in InAs/GaAs quantum dot arrays. Phys Rev B 82: 195321

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Popescu V, Bester G, Hanna MC, Norman AG, Zunger A (2008) Theoretical and experimental examination of the intermediate-band concept for strain-balanced (In,Ga)As/Ga(As,P) quantum dot solar cells. Phys Rev B 78: 205321

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagendijk A, van Tiggelen B, Wiersma DS (2009) Fifty years of Anderson localization. Phys Today 62: 24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reid WM, Driscoll T, Doty MF (2012) Forming delocalized intermediate states with realistic quantum dots. J Appl Phys 111: 056102

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahan BH, Myers RJ (1987) University chemistry. 4. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levy-Leblond JM (1995) Position-dependent effective mass and Galilean invariance. Phys Rev A 52: 1845–1849

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies PCW (1984) Quantum mechanics. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Landshoff P, Metherell A (1979) Simple quantum physics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Misra PK (2010) Physics of condensed matter. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hillhouse HW, Beard MC (2009) Solar cells from colloidal nanocrystals: fundamentals, materials, devices, and economics. Curr Opin Colloid Int Sci 14: 245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bailey CG, Hubbard SM, Forbes DV, Aguinaldo R, Cress CD, Polly SJ, Raffaelle RP (2009) Effect of barrier thickness on strain balanced InAs/GaAs QD solar cells. In: Proceedings of the photovoltaic specialists conference (PVSC), 2009 34th IEEE, pp 000137–000140

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    D. A. Edwards

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    W. M. Reid & M. F. Doty

Authors
  1. D. A. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. M. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. F. Doty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, D.A., Reid, W.M. & Doty, M.F. Wavefunction delocalization in quantum dot arrays: an asymptotic analysis. J Eng Math 81, 191–211 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9574-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9574-9

Keywords

  • Photovoltaics
  • Quantum dot array
  • Schrödinger equation
  • Tunnelling
  • Wavefunction delocalization