Practical mathematical representation of the flow due to a distribution of sources on a steadily advancing ship hull

Abstract

A practical mathematical representation of the flow velocity due to a distribution of sources on the mean wetted hull surface and the mean waterline of a ship that steadily advances along a straight path in calm water, of large depth and lateral extent, is presented. A main feature of this flow representation is a simple analytical approximation—valid within the entire flow region—to the local flow component in the expression for the gradient of the Green function associated with the classical Kelvin–Michell linearized free-surface boundary condition. Another notable feature of the flow representation is that the singularity associated with the gradient of the Green function is removed, using a straightforward regularization technique. The flow representation only involves elementary continuous functions (algebraic, exponential and trigonometric) of real arguments. These functions can then be integrated using ordinary Gaussian quadrature rules. Thus, the flow representation is particularly simple and well suited for practical flow calculations. The specific case of a low-order panel method—in which the hull geometry, the source density, and the flow velocity are consistently represented via piecewise linear approximations within flat triangular hull panels or straight waterline segments—is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Noblesse F, Delhommeau G, Guilbaud M, Hendrix D, Yang C (2008) Simple analytical relations for ship bow waves. J Fluid Mech 600: 105–132

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Letcher JS Jr, Marshall JK, Olliver JCIII, Salvesen N (1987) Stars & stripes. Sci Am 257: 34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wyatt DC, Chang PA (1994) Development and assessment of a total resistance optimized bow for the AE 36. Mar Technol 31: 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Percival S, Hendrix D, Noblesse F (2001) Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. Appl Ocean Res 23: 337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Yang C, Soto O, Löhner R, Noblesse F (2002) Hydrodynamic optimization of a trimaran. Ship Technol Res 49: 70–92

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kim HY, Yang C, Löhner R, Noblesse F (2008) A practical hydrodynamic optimization tool for the design of a monohull ship. In: International conference of Society of Offshore and Polar Engineering (ISOPE-08), Vancouver, Canada

  7. 7

    Noblesse F (1981) Alternative integral representations for the Green function of the theory of ship wave resistance. J Eng Math 15: 241–265

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Bessho M (1964) On the fundamental function in the theory of the wavemaking resistance of ships, vol 4. Memoirs Defense Academy, Japan, pp 99–119

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Noblesse F (1975) The near-field disturbance in the centerplane Havelock source potential. In: 1st International conference on Numerical ship hydrodynamics, Washington DC, pp 481–501

  10. 10

    Noblesse F (1978) On the fundamental function in the theory of steady motion of ships. J Ship Res 22: 212–215

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Newman JN (1987) Evaluation of the wave-resistance Green function: part 1—the double integral. J Ship Res 31: 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Telste JG, Noblesse F (1989) The nonoscillatory near-field term in the Green function for steady flow about a ship. In: 17th Symposium on Naval hydrodynamics, The Hague, Netherlands, pp 39–52

  13. 13

    Masson E, DeBayser O, Martin D (1991) Evaluation de la resistance de vagues d’un sous-marin en immersion totale, 3emes Journèes de l’Hydrodynamique. Grenoble, France

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Ponizy B, Noblesse F, Ba M, Guilbaud M (1994) Numerical evaluation of free-surface Green functions. J Ship Res 38: 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Noblesse F, Delhommeau G, Kim HY, Yang C (2009) Thin-ship theory and influence of rake and flare. J Eng Math 64: 49–80

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Noblesse F, Delhommeau G, Yang C (2009) Practical evaluation of steady flow due to a free-surface pressure patch. J Ship Res 53: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lyness JN, Jespersen D (1975) Moderate degree symmetric quadrature rules for the triangle. J Inst Math Appl 15: 19–32

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hendrix D, Noblesse F (1992) Recipes for computing the steady free-surface flow due to a source distribution. J Ship Res 36: 346–359

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Noblesse F (1983) A slender-ship theory of wave resistance. J Ship Res 27: 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Debo H, Yunbo L (1997) Ship wave resistance based on Noblesse’s slender ship theory and wave-steepness restriction. Ship Technol Res 44: 198–202

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    McCarthy JH (1985) Collected experimental resistance and flow data for three surface ship model hulls. David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, report DTNSRDC-85/011

  22. 22

    Cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic model in Japan. In: 17th ITTC Resistance Committee Report

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Noblesse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noblesse, F., Delhommeau, G., Huang, F. et al. Practical mathematical representation of the flow due to a distribution of sources on a steadily advancing ship hull. J Eng Math 71, 367–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-011-9453-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Free-surface flow
  • Green function
  • Source distribution
  • Steady ship waves