Skip to main content
Log in

A computer-assisted geometric approach to the analysis of the impact of billiard balls. Part I: Ideal impacts

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown how some recent general theoretical results on impacts of mechanical systems with unilateral constraints, obtained by means of Differential Geometric Impulsive Mechanics, can be operatively applied to the study of impacts between rigid bodies. The applicability of these geometric techniques is partly discussed for general impacts of rigid bodies. In particular, the general aspects of the algorithm are described and applied to analyze the impacts of two equal billiard balls moving on the plane in all possible ideal situations: when the balls can freely slide or roll on the plane of the billiard and/or between themselves. The use of symbolic-computation software is indispensable to solve the computational difficulties arising because of the high number of degrees of freedom of the system. It allows to obtain explicit expressions for the post-impact linear and angular velocities of the balls, and therefore a complete quantitative and qualitative analysis of any particular ideal impact with assigned pre-impact positions and velocities. The data regarding the usual billiard impact with the object ball at rest are explicitly listed and illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pasquero S (2005) Ideality criterion for unilateral constraints in time-dependent impulsive mechanics. J Math Phys 46(11): 112904

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasquero S (2006) On the simultaneous presence of unilateral and kinetic constraints in time-dependent impulsive mechanics. J Math Phys 47(8): 082903

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasquero S (2008) Nonideal unilateral constraints in time-dependent impulsive mechanics: a geometric approach. J Math Phys 49(4): 042902

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stronge S (2000) Impact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brogliato B (1996) Nonsmooth impact mechanics. Models, dynamics and control. Lecture notes in control and information sciences 220. Springer, New York

  6. Kane TR, Levinson DA (1987) An explicit solution of the general two-body collision problem. Comput Mech 2: 75–87

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Domenech A (2008) Non-smooth modeling of billiard- and superbilliard-ball collisions. Int J Mech Sci 50: 752–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CoCoA Team. Cocoa: a system for doing computations in commutative algebra. http://cocoa.dima.unige.it

  9. Crampin M, Pirani FAE (1986) Applicable differential geometry. Lecture notes series 59. London Mathematical Society, Cambridge

  10. de Leon M, Rodrigues PR (1990) Methods of differential geometry in analytical mechanics. North Holland, Amsterdam

  11. Pasquero-Link (2008) A computer assisted geometric approach for the analysis of the impact of billiard balls: ideal impacts data. http://www2.unipr.it/~passte25/Pubblicazioni.html

  12. Salazar A, Sanchez-Lavega A (1990) Motion of a ball on a rough horizontal surface after being struck by a tapering rod. Eur J Phys 11: 228–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. de la Torre Juarez M (1994) The effect of impulsive forces on a system with friction: the example of billiard game. Eur J Phys 15: 184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Pasquero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasquero, S. A computer-assisted geometric approach to the analysis of the impact of billiard balls. Part I: Ideal impacts. J Eng Math 69, 373–384 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-010-9405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-010-9405-9

Keywords

Navigation