Skip to main content
Log in

Midplane-symmetry breaking in the flow between two counter-rotating disks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the axisymmetric steady flow driven by exact counter rotation of two co-axial disks of finite radius. At the edges of the rotating disks one of three conditions is (typically) imposed: (i) zero velocity, corresponding to a stationary, impermeable, cylindrical shroud (ii) zero normal velocity and zero tangential fluid traction, corresponding to a (confined) free surface and (iii) an edge constraint that is consistent with a similarity solution of von Kármán form. The similarity solution is valid in an infinite geometry and possesses a pitchfork bifurcation that breaks the midplane symmetry at a critical Reynolds number. In this paper, similar bifurcations of the global (finite-domain) flow are sought and comparisons are made between the resulting bifurcation structure and that found for the similarity solution. The aim is to assess the validity of the nonlinear similarity solutions in finite domains and to explore the sensitivity of the solution structure to edge conditions that are implicitly neglected when assuming a self-similar flow. It is found that, whilst the symmetric similarity solution can be quantitatively useful for a range of boundary conditions, the bifurcated structure of the finite-domain flow is rather different for each boundary condition and bears little resemblance to the self-similar flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batchelor GK (1951) Note on a class of solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations representing steady rotationally- symmetric flow. Q J Mech Appl Math 4:29–41

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zandbergen PJ, Dijkstra D (1987) Von Kármán swirling flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 19:465–491

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman AS (1953) Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J Appl Phys 24:1232–1235

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Brady JF, Acrivos A (1981) Steady flow in a channel or tube with an accelerating surface velocity. An exact solution to the Navier–Stokes equations. J Fluid Mech 112:127–150

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaturska MB, Banks WHH (2003) New solutions for flow in a channel with porous walls and/or non-rigid walls. Fluid Dyn Res 33:57–71

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewitt RE, Duck PW, Al-Azhari M (2003) Extensions to three-dimensional flow in a porous channel. Fluid Dyn Res 33:17–39

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Terrill RM (1982) An exact solution for flow in a porous pipe. Z Angew Math Phys 22:547–552

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Riley N, Drazin PG (2006) The Navier–Stokes equations: A classification of flows and exact solutions (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 334). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brady JF, Durlofsky L (1987) On rotating disk flow. J Fluid Mech 175:363–394

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gauthier G, Gondret P, Moisy F, Rabaud M (2002) Instabilities in the flow between co- and counter-rotating disks. J Fluid Mech 473:1–21

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Nore C, Tartar M, Daube O, Tuckerman LS (2004) Survey of instability thresholds of flow between exactly counter- rotating disks. J Fluid Mech 511:45–65

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Witkowski LM, Delbende I, Walker JS, Le Quéré P (2006) Axisymmetric stability of the flow between two exactly counter-rotating disks with large aspect ratio. J Fluid Mech 546:193–202

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gresho PM, Sani RL (1998) Incompressible flow and the finite element method. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester England

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cliffe KA (1983) Numerical calculations of two-cell and single-cell Taylor flows. J Fluid Mech 135:219–233

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harriott GM, Brown RA (1984) Flow in differentially rotated cylindrical drop at moderate Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 144:403–418

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heil M, Hazel AL (2006) oomph-lib—An object-oriented multi-physics finite-element library. In: Schafer M, Bungartz H-J (eds) Fluid–structure interaction. Springer

  17. Cliffe KA (1996) ENTWIFE (Release 6.3) Reference Manual. AEAT-0823.

  18. Hewitt RE, Duck PW (2000) Non-axisymmetric rotating disk flows: nonlinear travelling-wave states. J Fluid Mech 413:287–316

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Banks WHH, Drazin PG, Zaturska MB (1988) On perturbations to Jeffery–Hamel flow. J Fluid Mech 186:559–581

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Hewitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, R.E., Hazel, A.L. Midplane-symmetry breaking in the flow between two counter-rotating disks. J Eng Math 57, 273–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-006-9098-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-006-9098-2

Keywords

Navigation