Abstract
The problem considered in this paper arises in the design of a high-temperature superconducting cryogenic current comparator (CCC). The CCC consists of two currents flowing in opposite directions inside a toroidal superconducting shield. The shield has a radial cut, necessary for the measurement of the current ratio, but causing an error in the obtained ratio. The problem of interest is the dependence of the error on the geometric parameters of the device: the major and minor radii of the shield, the cut width, the material thickness, and the location of the currents. In the first part of the paper, a toroidal shield with an infinitesimal cut is considered and analytic expressions are derived for the magnetic field and the surface-current distribution. In the second part, a cut of finite width is introduced. Since all the perturbing currents are present in the narrow region around the cut, a shield of cylindrical shape is assumed. Expressions are derived for the flux through the cut and the magnetic field around the cut. Analytical results are in good agreement with the numerical results obtained by a finite-element method. In the final part, the expression for the ratio error is derived, which shows that in order to minimize the error, currents should be concentrated around the shield axis, the major radius of the shield should be maximized and the bore radius minimized. The error depends logarithmically on the cut width.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Witt TJ (1998) Electrical resistance standards and the quantum Hall effect. Rev Sci Instrum 69:2823–2843
Feltin N, Devoille L, Piquemal F, Lotkhov SV, Zorin AB (2003) Progress in measurements of a single-electron pump by means of a CCC. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 52:599–603
Rietveld G, Bartolomé E, Sesé J, de la Court P, Flokstra J, Rillo C, Camón A (2003) 1:30000 Cryogenic current comparator with optimum SQUID readout. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 52:621–625
Williams JM, Kleinschmidt P (1999) A cryogenic current comparator bridge for resistance measurements at currents of up to 100 A. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 48:375–378
Seppä H, Satrapinski A, Kiviranta M, Virkki V (1999) Thin-film cryogenic current comparator. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 48:365–369
Piquemal F, Genevés G (2000) Argument for a direct realization of the quantum metrological triangle. Metrologia 37:207–211
Lotkhov SV, Bogoslovsky SA, Zorin AB, Niemeyer J (2001) Operation of a three-junction single-electron pump with on-chip resistors. Appl Phys Lett 78:946–948
Bubanja V (2002) Influence of the electromagnetic environment on the accuracy of the single electron pump. J Phys Soc Jpn 71:1501–1505
Keller MW, Eichenberger AL, Martinis JM, Zimmerman NM (1999) A capacitance standard based on counting electrons. Science 285:1706–1709
Mohr PJ, Taylor BN (2000) CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998. Rev Mod Phys 72:351–495
Seppä H (1990) The ratio error of the overlapped-tube cryogenic current comparator. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 39:689–697
Early MD, Jones K (1999) Optimum sensitivity of an externally shielded cryogenic current comparator. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 46:459–463
Sesé J, Rietveld G, Camón A, Rillo C, Vargas L, Christian G, Brons S, Hiddink MGH, Flokstra J, Rogalla H, Jaszczuk W, Altenburg H (1999) Design and realisation of an optimal current sensitive CCC. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 48:370–374
Hao L, Gallop JC, Macfarlane JC, Carr C (2003) HTS cryogenic current comparator for non-invasive sensing of charged particle beams. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 52:617–620
Elmquist RE (1999) Cryogenic current comparator measurements at 77 K using thallium-2233 thick-film shields. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 48:383–386
Early MD, Jones K, van Dam MA (2000) Development of an HTS cryogenic current comparator. In: Obradors X, Sandiumenge F, Fontcuberta J (eds) Applied supperconductivity 1999. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, pp 517–520
Early MD, Jones K, Staines MP, Exley RR (2001) Development of a split-toroid high-temperature superconducting cryogenic current comparator. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 50:306–309
Morse PM, Feshbach H (1953) Methods of theoretical physics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (1994) Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic Press, New York
Cohl HS, Rau ARP, Tohline JE, Browne DA, Cazes JE, Barnes EI (2001) Useful alternative to the multiple expansion of 1/r potentials. Phys Rev A 64:052509
Cohl HS, Tohline JE (1999) A compact cylindrical Green’s function expansion for the solution of potential problems. Astrophys J 527:86–101
Cohl HS, Tohline JE, Rau ARP, Srivastava HM (2000) Developments in determining the gravitational potential using toroidal functions. Astron Nachr 321:363–372
van Milligen BPh, Lopez Fraguas A (1994) Expansion of vacuum magnetic fields in toroidal harmonics. Comput Phys Commun 81:74–90
Krokhmal PA (2002) Exact solution of the displacement boundary-value problem of elasticity for a torus. J. Engng. Math. 44:345–368
Kevorkian J, Dole JD (1996) Multiple scale and singular perturbation methods. Springer-Verlag, New York
Levine H, Schwinger J (1948) On the radiation of sound from an unflanged circular pipe. Phys Rev 73:383–406
Ursescu A, Eckart W, Marschall H, Hutter K (2004) Inhomogeneous electric field generated by two long electrodes placed along infinite walls separating different dielectric media. J Engng Math 49:57–75
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Hanbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications, Inc. New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bubanja, V. Magnetic-field calculation for a high-temperature superconducting cryogenic current comparator. J Eng Math 57, 99–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-006-9061-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-006-9061-2