“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

Abstract

In the context of software startups, project failure is embraced actively and considered crucial to obtain validated learning that can lead to pivots. A pivot is the strategic change of a business concept, product or the different elements of a business model. A better understanding is needed on different types of pivots and different factors that lead to failures and trigger pivots, for software entrepreneurial teams to make better decisions under chaotic and unpredictable environment. Due to the nascent nature of the topic, the existing research and knowledge on the pivots of software startups are very limited. In this study, we aimed at identifying the major types of pivots that software startups make during their startup processes, and highlighting the factors that fail software projects and trigger pivots. To achieve this, we conducted a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups. 10 pivot types and 14 triggering factors were identified. The findings show that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types. Together with customer segment pivot, they are common market related pivots. The major product related pivots are zoom-in and technology pivots. Several new pivot types were identified, including market zoom-in, complete and side project pivots. Our study also demonstrates that negative customer reaction and flawed business model are the most common factors that trigger pivots in software startups. Our study extends the research knowledge on software startup pivot types and pivot triggering factors. Meanwhile it provides practical knowledge to software startups, which they can utilize to guide their effective decisions on pivoting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.startupgrind.com/blog/is-pivot-the-new-fail/

  2. 2.

    http://www.inc.com/alan-spoon/what-pivot-really-means.html

  3. 3.

    http://www.seoquake.com

References

  1. Blank S (2005) The four steps to the epiphany. 1st edn. CafePress

  2. Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harv Bus Rev 91(5):64+

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch J, Olsson HH, Björk J, Ljungblad J (2013) The early stage software startup development model: a framework for operationalizing lean principles in software startups, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), pp 1–15

  4. Boslaugh S (2007) An introduction to secondary data analysis. In: Secondary data sources for public health: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press

  5. Carlson (2011) The real history of Twitter. http://businessinsider.com/how-twitter-was-founded-2011-4/. Accessed 2 Nov 2015

  6. Cruzes DS, Dybå T, Runeson P, Höst M (2015) Case studies synthesis: a thematic, cross-case, and narrative synthesis worked example. Empir Softw Eng 20(6):1634–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenmann, T, Ries, E, Dillard, S (2012) Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: the lean startup. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Case No. 812–095

  8. Giardino C, Wang X, Abrahamsson P (2014) Why early-stage software startups fail: a behavioral framework. ICSOB, pp 27–41

  9. Giardino C, Bajwa SS, Wang X, Abrahamsson P (2015) Key challenges in early-stage software startups. XP, Helsinki, Finland, LNBIP, pp 52–63

  10. Giardino C, Paternoster N, Unterkalmsteiner M, Gorschek T, Abrahamsson P (2016) Software development in startup companies: the greenfield startup model. In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (forthcoming)

  11. Hirvikoski K (2014) Startups pivoting towards value. Data and value-driven software engineering with deep customer insight. Proceedings of the seminar no. 58314308. Jürgen Münch (ED.) University of Helsinki, Finland, pp 1–7

  12. Jerkovic JI (2010) SEO warrior: essential techniques for increasing web visibility. O’Reilly Media

  13. Kelly SM (2013) Gaming empire supercell: we pop champagne every time we fail. http://mashable.com/2013/11/13/supercell-apps-success/#FkbCo9dnpkqZ. Accessed 14 Nov 2015

  14. Kitchenham B (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. EBSE-2007-01. Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, UK and Department of Computer Science, University of Durham, Durham, UK

  15. Linberg KR (1999) Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case study. J Syst Softw 49(2):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Macmillan IC, Zemann L, Subbanarasimha P (1987) Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. J Bus Ventur 2(2):123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marmer M, Bjoern LH, Dogrultan E, Berman R (2011) Startup genome report a new framework for understanding why startups succeed

  18. Maurya A (2012) Running lean: iterate from plan a to a plan that works, 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media

  19. McGrath A (2011) Failed by design, https://hbr.org/2011/04/failing-by-design. Accessed 8 April 2016

  20. Mendoza A, Carroll J, Stern L (2010) Software appropriation over time: from adoption to stabilization and beyond. Australas J Inf Syst 16(2)

  21. Nazar J (2013) 14 Famous business pivots, http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonnazar/2013/10/08/14-famous-business-pivots/. Accessed 2 Nov. 2015

  22. Nobel C (2011) Why companies fail and how their founders can bounce back. Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School, Boston. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6591.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2015

  23. Paternoster N, Giardino C, Unterkalmsteiner M, Gorschek T, Abrahamsson P (2014) Software development in startup companies: a systematic mapping study. Inf Softw Technol 56(10):1200–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richardson A (2011) STOP CELEBRATING FAILURE, Harvard Business Review, http://www.businessinsider.com/stop-trying-to-celebrate-failure-2011-3?IR=T. Accessed 8 April 2016

  25. Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. Penguin Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Runeson P, Höst M (2009) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir Softw Eng 14(2):131–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Savolainen P, Ahonen JJ, Richardson I (2011) Software development project success and failure from the supplier’s perspective: a systematic literature review. Int J Proj Manag 30(4):458–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shepherd DA, Wiklund J, Haynie JM (2009) Moving forward: balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. J Bus Ventur 24(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sutton SM (2003) The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Softw 17(4):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Terho H, Suonsyrjä S, Karisalo A, Mikkonen T (2015) Ways to cross the rubicon: pivoting in software startups. SSU’15 workshop, PROFES’15, pp 555–568

  31. Trzesniewski KH, Donnellan MB, Lucas RE (2011) Secondary data analysis: an introduction for psychologists. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists

  32. Van der Van JS, Bosch J (2013) Pivots and architectural decisions: two sides of the same medal? What architecture research and lean startup can learn from each other. In Proceedings of Eight International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA’13), Venice, Italy, pp 310–317

  33. Vartanian TP (2011) Secondary data analysis. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X, Conboy K, Cawley O (2012) “Leagile” software development: an experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development. J Syst Softw 85(6):1284–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Womack JP, Daniel TJ, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Free Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications Inc

  37. Yin RK, Heald KA (1975) Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies. Adm Sci Q 20(3):371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu YW, Chang YS, Chen YF, Chu LS (2012) Entrepreneurial success for hightech start-ups - case study of taiwan high-tech companies, Palermo, Italy, pp 933–937

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohaib Shahid Bajwa.

Additional information

Communicated by: Magne Jørgensen, Mika Mäntylä, Paul Ralph and Hakan Erdogmus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bajwa, S.S., Wang, X., Nguyen Duc, A. et al. “Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups. Empir Software Eng 22, 2373–2408 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9458-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pivot
  • Software startups
  • Lean startup
  • Validated learning
  • Pivoting factor
  • Side project