Skip to main content
Log in

Creating Europe through culture? The impact of the European Song Contest on European identity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The UK’s Brexit vote marked a major institutional crisis for the EU and re-opened both the scholarly and the popular debate about the importance and drivers of a “European identity”. We use quasi-experimental data to estimate the immediate impact of the biggest pan-European cultural event, the Eurovision Song Contest, on whether people in Europe consider themselves to be Europeans. Using data from several Eurobarometer surveys with tens of thousands of observations, we find little evidence that the contest at current provides a sizeable immediate boost to the share of Europeans who feel European, feel EU citizens, or have a positive image of the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While identity has been a “standard” subject of study in both psychology and sociology, there is also a substantial literature on identity in economics, focusing mainly on the impact of identity on economic outcomes. One of the first papers to introduce identity into the economics literature is Akerlof and Kranton (2000), who argue that identity, “a person’s sense of self”, is associated with “prescribed behaviours” and that violating such prescribed behaviours leads to discomfort. Consequently, identity affects the payoffs from one’s actions and thus one’s economic behaviour. Various aspects of the interaction between economic behaviour and identity have since been studied: Benjamin et al. (2010) focus on how identity affects time and risk preferences and Hoff and Pandey (2014) investigate how cues to identity affect intellectual performance, while Kranton et al. (2016) analyse how prosocial behaviour varies with group affiliation.

  2. There are two semi-finals and one final.

  3. But one cannot vote for the performer of one’s own country.

  4. Others estimate the influence of these voting patterns on economic outcomes. For example, Felbermayr and Toubal (2010) and Kokko and Tingvall (2014) use the cultural preferences expressed in Eurovision voting to study the impact of culture on trade.

  5. The data set was downloaded from the GESIS data archive—https://www.gesis.org/eurobarometer-data-service/survey-series/standard-special-eb/study-overview/—except for the 2015 survey, for which the date of the interview was not included in the GESIS data set but obtained from Kantar Public Brussels, which implements the Eurobarometer surveys.

  6. Unlike the first 2 questions, this question was also posed to respondents in 5 candidate countries, but we exclude these observations, focusing only on the respondents from the 28 EU member states.

  7. For the first question, answers (1) and (2) are coded as 1, for the second question, any answer other than (1) is coded as 1 and, for the last question, answers (1) and (2) are coded as 1. Respondents who gave no answer are excluded from the sample.

  8. While we have data from day − 8 to day + 12, we only show the days for which we have data for all the years for the sake of comparability across days.

  9. In a joint test of these factors (see McKenzie 2017), we easily reject the null of no significant coefficients. Not surprisingly, the day of the week and country explain a large chunk in the variation in the interview group to which a respondent is allocated, with other factors contributing little to the R2.

  10. If we use a probit model rather than an OLS model, we obtain similar results, with none of the marginal effects being significant at the 10% significance level.

  11. Moreover, not all of these are necessarily European.

  12. In addition, besides watching ESC on television, people can follow the ESC online or via radio.

  13. The data were downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/themeKy/19/groupKy/102.

References

  • Agger G (2001) Fictions of Europe: on “Eurofiction”—a multinational research project. Nord Rev 22(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof G, Kranton R (2000) Economics and identity. J Econ CXV(3):715–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Akšamija A (2005) Eurovision Song Contest: between symbolism of European unity and a vision of the wild, wild East. Europe Lost and Found, May 2005. www.europelostandfound.net/files/elf/Eurovision.pdf. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

  • Alesina A, Tabellini G, Trebbi F (2017) Is Europe an optimal political area?. Brookings papers on economic activity, forthcoming

  • Aravindakshan A, Naik P (2011) How does awareness evolve after advertisement stops—the role of memory. Mark Lett 22:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspachs-Bracons O, Clots-Figueras I, Costa-Font J, Masella P (2008) Compulsory language educational policies and identity formation. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(2–3):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi V, Rasul I (2016) Persuasion: a case study of papal influences on fertility-related beliefs and behavior. Working paper

  • Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Am Econ Rev 100(4):1913–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruter M (2009) Time bomb? The dynamic effect of news and symbols on the political identity of European citizens. Comp Political Stud 42(12):1498–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey s (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? Eur Union Politics 3(4):387–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers AW, Dellmuth LM (2015) The effect of EU spending on support for the integration process depends on how ‘European’ citizens feel. 4 August http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/08/04/the-effect-of-eu-spending-on-support-for-the-integration-process-depends-on-how-european-citizens-feel/

  • Clots-Figueras I, Masella P (2013) Education, language and identity. Econ J 123(570):F332–F357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Font J, Cowell F (2015) European identity and redistributive preferences. LSE International Inequalities Institute working paper 3

  • Cram L (2012) Does the EU need a navel? Implicit and explicit identification with the European Union. JCMS 50(1):71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese C, Azrout R, Moeller J (2016) Cross road elections: change in EU performance evaluations during the European parliament elections 2014. Politics Gov 4(1):69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet P, van Spanje J, de Vreese C (2015) Euro-pean public sphere. Discussing the democratic deficit: effects of media and interpersonal communication on satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Int J Commun 9(22):3177–3198

    Google Scholar 

  • European Broadcasting Union (2016) ESC TV audience report

  • European Commission (2000) Commission approves the EBU-Eurovision system. Press Release IP/00/472

  • Eurovision.tv (2014) Vienna 2015 slogan revealed. https://eurovision.tv/story/vienna-2015-slogan-revealed. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

  • Eurovision.tv (2016). Eurovision Song Contest to receive Charlemagne Medal. https://eurovision.tv/story/eurovision-song-contest-to-receive-charlemagne-medal. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

  • Felbermayr GJ, Toubal F (2010) Cultural proximity and trade. Eur Econ Rev 54(2):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker K, Gluhovic M (2013) Introduction: Eurovision and the ‘new’ Europe. In: Fricker K, Gluhovic Milija (eds) Performing the ‘New’ Europe: identities, feelings, and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg V, Noury A (2008) The Eurovision Song Contest. Is voting political or cultural? Eur J Political Econ 24(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel J, Krekel C, Tiefenbach T, Ziebarth NR (2015) How natural disasters can affect environmental concerns, risk aversion, and even politics: evidence from Fukushima and three European countries. J Popul Econ 28:1137–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann R, Brewer M (2004) Identities and Institutions: becoming European in the EU. In: Herrmann R, Risse T, Brewer M (eds) Transnational identities. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff K, Pandey P (2014) Making up people—the effect of identity on performance in a modernizing society. J Dev Econ 106(C):118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakiela P, Ozier O (2019) The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev Econ Stat 101(3):547–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleider H, Stoeckel F (2019) The politics of international redistribution: explaining public support for fiscal transfers in the EU. Eur J Political Res 58:4–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko A, Tingvall PG (2014) Distance, transaction costs, and preferences in European trade. Int Trade J 28(2):87–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranton R, Pease M, Sanders S, Huettel S (2016) Groupy and non-groupy behavior: deconstructing bias in social preferences. Working paper

  • Laufer G (2016) Eurovision 2016 viewing figures: How many watched in your country?. ESCtodaycom, May 22, 2016. http://esctoday.com/136166/eurovision-2016-viewing-figures-many-watched-country/. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

  • Le Guern P (2000) From national pride to global kitsch: the Eurovision Song Contest. Web J French Media Stud. http://wjfms.ncl.ac.uk/leguWJ.htm. Retrieved on 28 August 2019

  • McKenzie D (2017) Should we require balance t-tests of baseline observables in randomized experiments?. Development Impact Blog. http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/should-we-require-balance-t-tests-baseline-observables-randomized-experiments. Retrieved on 28 August 2019

  • McNamara KR (2015) The politics of everyday Europe: constructing authority in the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez C, Bachtler J (2016) European identity and citizen attitudes to cohesion policy: What do we know?. Cohesify research paper 1

  • Metcalfe R, Powdthavee N, Dolan P (2011) Destruction and distress: using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on mental well-being in the United Kingdom. Econ J 121(550):F81–F103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell K (2015) Rethinking the ‘Erasmus Effect’ on European identity. JCMS J Common Market Stud 53(2):330–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse T (2010) A community of Europeans?: transnational identities and public spheres. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigalas E (2010) Cross-border mobility and European identity: the effectiveness of intergroup contact during the ERASMUS year abroad. Eur Union Politics 11(2):241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierdijk L, Vellekoop M (2009) The structure of bias in peer voting systems: lessons from the Eurovision Song Contest. Empir Econ 36:403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel F (2011) EU media salience, instrumental thinking and identification with the EU, chapter 9. In: Oppermann K, Viehrig H (eds) Issue salience in international politics. Routledge, London, pp 137–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel F (2016) Contact and community: the role of social interactions for a political identity. Political Psychol 37(3):431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis G, Franses PH (2006) Optimal data interval for estimating advertising response. Market Sci 25(3):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2019) How to win the Eurovision Song Contest. Charlemagne, May 16, 2019

  • Tobin R (2007) Eurovision at 50: post-wall and post-stonewall. In: Tobin R, Raykoff I (eds) A song for Europe: popular music and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Mol C (2018) Becoming Europeans: the relationship between student exchanges in higher education, European citizenship and a sense of European identity. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 31(4):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulou S, Talving L (2019) Opportunity or threat? Public attitudes towards EU freedom of movement. J Eur Public Policy 26(6):805–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yair G (2018) Douze point: Eurovisions and Euro-Divisions in the Eurovision Song Contest—review of two decades of research. Eur J Cult Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418776562(forthcoming)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YouGov (2013) Eurotrack April 2013 results. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/t8fgaph9bw/YG-Archive-April-Eurotrack-results-240413.pdf. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

  • YouGov (2016) Eurotrack April 2016 results. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/baqje5i5rc/Eurotrack_April_Eurovision-Website.pdf. Retrieved on 9 June 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Abdul Noury, Bob Reed and Victor Ginsburgh for their helpful comments and Chris Hanley from Kantar Public for providing the 2015 data set.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Coupe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coupe, T., Chaban, N. Creating Europe through culture? The impact of the European Song Contest on European identity. Empirica 47, 885–908 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09461-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09461-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation