Skip to main content
Log in

Expected downside risk and asset prices: characteristics of emerging and developed European markets

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses an empirical analysis of the expected downside risk based asset-pricing model on Central and Eastern European and developed Western European markets. The investigated risk measure applies a nonparametric approach that allows getting rid of any assumption on the distribution of returns, moreover, as presented in this paper, captures risk and expected return with superior performance. Furthermore, we also show that dollar-denominated returns often indicate a better fit than regressions in local currency suggesting that international capital inflow does play an important role in asset prices. This latter finding is particularly significant on Developed European capital markets, which is in contradiction with the belief of international investors having a greater influence on emerging markets compared to developed ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad W, Bhanumurthy NR, Sehgal S (2015) Regime dependent dynamics and European stock markets: is asset allocation really possible? Empirica 42(1):77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro L, Chanda A, Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sayek S (2004) FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. J Int Econ 64(1):89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbatli EC (2011) Economic policies and FDI inflows to emerging market economies. IMF Working Papers, pp 1–25

  • Artzner PH, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan AA, Estrin S (2004) The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. J Comp Econ 32(4):775–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitz D, Van Vliet P (2007) The volatility effect: lower risk without lower return. J Portf Manag 34(1):102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitz D, Pang J, Van Vliet P (2013) The volatility effect in emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 16:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Huisman R, Koedijk K (2001) Optimal portfolio selection in a value-at-risk framework. J Bank Finance 25:1789–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations Househ Econ Growth 89:89–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Ormos M (2009) Return calculation methodology: evidence from the Hungarian mutual fund industry. Acta Oecon 59(4):391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Ormos M, Zibriczky D (2011) Non-parametric and semi-parametric asset pricing. Econ Model 28(3):1150–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada J (2002) Systematic risk in emerging markets: the D-CAPM. Emerg Mark Rev 3(4):365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel M, Funke K, Stadtmann G (2004) A panel analysis of bilateral FDI flows to emerging economies. Econ Syst 28(3):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2002) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Mit Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Liu Q, Rhee SG, Wu F (2012) Extreme downside risk and expected stock returns. J Bank Finance 36(5):1492–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (1968) The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. J Finance 23(2):389–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P (2007) Financial risk manager handbook. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating C, Shadwick WF (2002) A universal performance measure. J Perform Meas 6:59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q J Econ 121(4):1133–1165

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1991) Foundations of portfolio theory. J Finance 46:469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34:768–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormos M, Timotity D (2016) Generalized asset pricing: expected downside risk-based equilibrium modeling. Econ Model 52:967–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19:425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality: empirically grounded economic reason. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor JL (1962) Toward a theory of market value of risky assets. In: Korajczyk R (ed) Asset pricing and portfolio performance. Risk Books, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the conference participants at the Workshop on Behavioural Economics and Industrial Organization at Corvinus University, 2014. Mihály Ormos acknowledges the support by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. This research was partially supported by Pallas Athéné Domus Scientiae Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihály Ormos.

Appendix: R2 values of regressions separately for countries and time horizons

Appendix: R2 values of regressions separately for countries and time horizons

First, daily, weekly, monthly and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α = 0 and local currency.

 

US

UK

Germany

France

Hungary

Poland

Czeck Rep.

Daily

 Vol

0.93

0.05

0.91

0.51

0.00

0.15

0.53

 Var

0.94

0.01

0.89

0.42

0.00

0.15

0.81

 Edr

0.91

0.04

0.90

0.49

0.03

0.20

0.60

 Beta

0.82

0.21

0.88

0.45

0.16

0.11

0.25

 Svar

0.89

0.01

0.90

0.31

0.05

0.15

0.53

 Dbeta

0.93

0.04

0.92

0.44

0.06

0.18

0.60

Weekly

 Vol

0.94

0.06

0.90

0.48

0.01

0.14

0.59

 Var

0.93

0.00

0.87

0.37

0.01

0.14

0.85

 Edr

0.93

0.03

0.87

0.44

0.06

0.18

0.69

 Beta

0.87

0.07

0.88

0.41

0.17

0.10

0.25

 Svar

0.87

0.06

0.85

0.31

0.10

0.14

0.80

 Dbeta

0.91

0.00

0.90

0.48

0.07

0.18

0.68

Monthly

 Vol

0.94

0.08

0.87

0.51

0.02

0.13

0.52

 Var

0.91

0.02

0.80

0.41

0.03

0.14

0.68

 Edr

0.86

0.01

0.78

0.32

0.10

0.22

0.77

 Beta

0.77

0.11

0.83

0.46

0.16

0.13

0.48

 Svar

0.77

0.03

0.68

0.27

0.10

0.15

0.78

 Dbeta

0.90

0.11

0.81

0.46

0.08

0.14

0.70

Yearly

 Vol

0.93

0.05

0.78

0.29

0.10

0.29

0.72

 Var

0.77

0.01

0.63

0.13

0.09

0.23

0.89

 Edr

0.13

0.37

0.02

0.05

0.53

0.54

0.96

 Beta

0.32

0.00

0.69

0.12

0.07

0.16

0.04

 Svar

0.79

0.00

0.63

0.17

0.06

0.25

0.81

 Dbeta

0.91

0.00

0.79

0.33

0.08

0.33

0.63

Second, the daily, weekly, monthly and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α = 0 and dollar denominated returns.

 

US

UK

Germany

France

Hungary

Poland

Czeck Rep.

Daily

 Vol

0.93

0.06

0.83

0.30

0.05

0.00

0.54

 Var

0.94

0.01

0.81

0.23

0.05

0.00

0.83

 Edr

0.91

0.04

0.82

0.28

0.04

0.01

0.57

 Beta

0.82

0.18

0.80

0.26

0.00

0.00

0.27

 Svar

0.89

0.03

0.82

0.12

0.01

0.00

0.53

 Dbeta

0.93

0.07

0.84

0.22

0.02

0.00

0.62

Weekly

 Vol

0.94

0.07

0.83

0.35

0.03

0.01

0.55

 Var

0.93

0.01

0.80

0.26

0.01

0.01

0.82

 Edr

0.93

0.04

0.80

0.31

0.01

0.02

0.66

 Beta

0.87

0.08

0.82

0.28

0.00

0.01

0.30

 Svar

0.87

0.04

0.74

0.30

0.00

0.02

0.83

 Dbeta

0.91

0.12

0.81

0.36

0.02

0.01

0.76

Monthly

 Vol

0.94

0.01

0.81

0.30

0.03

0.01

0.57

 Var

0.91

0.02

0.77

0.22

0.01

0.02

0.81

 Edr

0.86

0.01

0.73

0.18

0.01

0.04

0.78

 Beta

0.77

0.00

0.78

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.40

 Svar

0.77

0.01

0.77

0.22

0.00

0.01

0.76

 Dbeta

0.90

0.01

0.81

0.31

0.02

0.00

0.65

Yearly

 Vol

0.93

0.00

0.49

0.01

0.01

0.18

0.79

 Var

0.77

0.05

0.38

0.00

0.02

0.14

0.92

 Edr

0.13

0.34

0.10

0.13

0.27

0.41

0.97

 Beta

0.32

0.06

0.44

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.14

 Svar

0.79

0.09

0.41

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.93

 Dbeta

0.91

0.00

0.49

0.01

0.01

0.16

0.75

Third, daily, weekly, monthy and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α ≠ 0 and local currency.

 

US

UK

Germany

France

Hungary

Poland

Czeck Rep.

Daily

 Vol

0.59

0.60

0.08

0.00

0.10

0.01

0.77

 Var

0.63

0.62

0.09

0.00

0.10

0.02

0.87

 Edr

0.42

0.78

0.03

0.01

0.13

0.12

0.88

 Beta

0.00

0.19

0.01

0.03

0.24

0.02

0.12

 Svar

0.58

0.13

0.19

0.02

0.03

0.05

0.44

 Dbeta

0.52

0.18

0.19

0.01

0.16

0.04

0.58

Weekly

 Vol

0.62

0.72

0.08

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.78

 Var

0.69

0.72

0.08

0.01

0.00

0.02

0.89

 Edr

0.53

0.78

0.00

0.07

0.46

0.07

0.88

 Beta

0.17

0.52

0.04

0.06

0.29

0.02

0.11

 Svar

0.51

0.74

0.08

0.00

0.33

0.06

0.78

 Dbeta

0.45

0.77

0.08

0.01

0.29

0.05

0.76

Monthly

 Vol

0.60

0.55

0.01

0.00

0.06

0.00

0.62

 Var

0.63

0.59

0.02

0.00

0.05

0.02

0.66

 Edr

0.09

0.88

0.09

0.24

0.58

0.14

0.87

 Beta

0.02

0.06

0.00

0.01

0.36

0.00

0.43

 Svar

0.34

0.37

0.00

0.02

0.48

0.05

0.75

 Dbeta

0.39

0.16

0.00

0.01

0.40

0.01

0.74

Yearly

 Vol

0.45

0.24

0.00

0.02

0.00

0.07

0.81

 Var

0.44

0.26

0.00

0.04

0.01

0.08

0.87

 Edr

0.06

0.96

0.54

0.59

0.68

0.39

0.98

 Beta

0.16

0.19

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.01

0.20

 Svar

0.42

0.55

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.10

0.78

 Dbeta

0.37

0.63

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

0.70

Fourth, the daily, weekly, monthy and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α ≠ 0 and dollar denominated returns.

 

US

UK

Germany

France

Hungary

Poland

Czeck Rep.

Daily

 Vol

0.59

0.61

0.02

0.02

0.00

0.02

0.79

 Var

0.63

0.63

0.02

0.03

0.00

0.02

0.89

 Edr

0.42

0.78

0.00

0.09

0.10

0.00

0.87

 Beta

0.00

0.12

0.00

0.09

0.30

0.03

0.16

 Svar

0.58

0.07

0.06

0.09

0.02

0.01

0.44

 Dbeta

0.52

0.10

0.08

0.07

0.14

0.01

0.57

Weekly

 Vol

0.62

0.67

0.00

0.03

0.14

0.01

0.73

 Var

0.69

0.69

0.00

0.03

0.12

0.00

0.85

 Edr

0.53

0.70

0.10

0.13

0.58

0.02

0.88

 Beta

0.17

0.43

0.00

0.12

0.33

0.01

0.20

 Svar

0.51

0.24

0.00

0.00

0.09

0.01

0.80

 Dbeta

0.45

0.74

0.04

0.00

0.32

0.02

0.75

Monthly

 Vol

0.60

0.66

0.00

0.06

0.12

0.00

0.70

 Var

0.63

0.66

0.01

0.06

0.11

0.01

0.82

 Edr

0.09

0.87

0.12

0.44

0.87

0.11

0.91

 Beta

0.02

0.66

0.01

0.08

0.27

0.05

0.32

 Svar

0.34

0.66

0.01

0.01

0.18

0.00

0.69

 Dbeta

0.39

0.64

0.00

0.02

0.18

0.00

0.65

Yearly

 Vol

0.45

0.78

0.13

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.84

 Var

0.44

0.81

0.12

0.06

0.01

0.01

0.89

 Edr

0.06

0.98

0.86

0.60

0.69

0.25

0.98

 Beta

0.16

0.79

0.09

0.11

0.01

0.09

0.00

 Svar

0.42

0.77

0.07

0.04

0.00

0.01

0.90

 Dbeta

0.37

0.73

0.10

0.03

0.00

0.01

0.84

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ormos, M., Timotity, D. Expected downside risk and asset prices: characteristics of emerging and developed European markets. Empirica 44, 529–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9329-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9329-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation