Abstract
This paper discusses an empirical analysis of the expected downside risk based asset-pricing model on Central and Eastern European and developed Western European markets. The investigated risk measure applies a nonparametric approach that allows getting rid of any assumption on the distribution of returns, moreover, as presented in this paper, captures risk and expected return with superior performance. Furthermore, we also show that dollar-denominated returns often indicate a better fit than regressions in local currency suggesting that international capital inflow does play an important role in asset prices. This latter finding is particularly significant on Developed European capital markets, which is in contradiction with the belief of international investors having a greater influence on emerging markets compared to developed ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad W, Bhanumurthy NR, Sehgal S (2015) Regime dependent dynamics and European stock markets: is asset allocation really possible? Empirica 42(1):77–107
Alfaro L, Chanda A, Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sayek S (2004) FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. J Int Econ 64(1):89–112
Arbatli EC (2011) Economic policies and FDI inflows to emerging market economies. IMF Working Papers, pp 1–25
Artzner PH, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228
Bevan AA, Estrin S (2004) The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. J Comp Econ 32(4):775–787
Blitz D, Van Vliet P (2007) The volatility effect: lower risk without lower return. J Portf Manag 34(1):102–113
Blitz D, Pang J, Van Vliet P (2013) The volatility effect in emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 16:31–45
Campbell R, Huisman R, Koedijk K (2001) Optimal portfolio selection in a value-at-risk framework. J Bank Finance 25:1789–1804
Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations Househ Econ Growth 89:89–125
Erdős P, Ormos M (2009) Return calculation methodology: evidence from the Hungarian mutual fund industry. Acta Oecon 59(4):391–409
Erdős P, Ormos M, Zibriczky D (2011) Non-parametric and semi-parametric asset pricing. Econ Model 28(3):1150–1162
Estrada J (2002) Systematic risk in emerging markets: the D-CAPM. Emerg Mark Rev 3(4):365–379
Frenkel M, Funke K, Stadtmann G (2004) A panel analysis of bilateral FDI flows to emerging economies. Econ Syst 28(3):281–300
Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2002) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Mit Press, Cambridge
Huang W, Liu Q, Rhee SG, Wu F (2012) Extreme downside risk and expected stock returns. J Bank Finance 36(5):1492–1502
Jensen MC (1968) The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. J Finance 23(2):389–416
Jorion P (2007) Financial risk manager handbook. Wiley, Hoboken
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291
Keating C, Shadwick WF (2002) A universal performance measure. J Perform Meas 6:59–84
Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q J Econ 121(4):1133–1165
Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:13–37
Markowitz HM (1991) Foundations of portfolio theory. J Finance 46:469–477
Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34:768–783
Ormos M, Timotity D (2016) Generalized asset pricing: expected downside risk-based equilibrium modeling. Econ Model 52:967–980
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41
Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19:425–442
Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality: empirically grounded economic reason. MIT press, Cambridge
Treynor JL (1962) Toward a theory of market value of risky assets. In: Korajczyk R (ed) Asset pricing and portfolio performance. Risk Books, London
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the conference participants at the Workshop on Behavioural Economics and Industrial Organization at Corvinus University, 2014. Mihály Ormos acknowledges the support by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. This research was partially supported by Pallas Athéné Domus Scientiae Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: R2 values of regressions separately for countries and time horizons
Appendix: R2 values of regressions separately for countries and time horizons
First, daily, weekly, monthly and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α = 0 and local currency.
US | UK | Germany | France | Hungary | Poland | Czeck Rep. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | |||||||
Vol | 0.93 | 0.05 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.53 |
Var | 0.94 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.81 |
Edr | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.90 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.60 |
Beta | 0.82 | 0.21 | 0.88 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.25 |
Svar | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.53 |
Dbeta | 0.93 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.60 |
Weekly | |||||||
Vol | 0.94 | 0.06 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.59 |
Var | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.85 |
Edr | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.69 |
Beta | 0.87 | 0.07 | 0.88 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.25 |
Svar | 0.87 | 0.06 | 0.85 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.80 |
Dbeta | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.68 |
Monthly | |||||||
Vol | 0.94 | 0.08 | 0.87 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.52 |
Var | 0.91 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.68 |
Edr | 0.86 | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.77 |
Beta | 0.77 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.46 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.48 |
Svar | 0.77 | 0.03 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.78 |
Dbeta | 0.90 | 0.11 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.70 |
Yearly | |||||||
Vol | 0.93 | 0.05 | 0.78 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.72 |
Var | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.63 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
Edr | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.96 |
Beta | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
Svar | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.81 |
Dbeta | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.63 |
Second, the daily, weekly, monthly and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α = 0 and dollar denominated returns.
US | UK | Germany | France | Hungary | Poland | Czeck Rep. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | |||||||
Vol | 0.93 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
Var | 0.94 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
Edr | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.57 |
Beta | 0.82 | 0.18 | 0.80 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.27 |
Svar | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.82 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
Dbeta | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0.84 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
Weekly | |||||||
Vol | 0.94 | 0.07 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
Var | 0.93 | 0.01 | 0.80 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.82 |
Edr | 0.93 | 0.04 | 0.80 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.66 |
Beta | 0.87 | 0.08 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.30 |
Svar | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.74 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.83 |
Dbeta | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.76 |
Monthly | |||||||
Vol | 0.94 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.57 |
Var | 0.91 | 0.02 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.81 |
Edr | 0.86 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.78 |
Beta | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
Svar | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.76 |
Dbeta | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
Yearly | |||||||
Vol | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
Var | 0.77 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Edr | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.97 |
Beta | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
Svar | 0.79 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Dbeta | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.75 |
Third, daily, weekly, monthy and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α ≠ 0 and local currency.
US | UK | Germany | France | Hungary | Poland | Czeck Rep. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | |||||||
Vol | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.77 |
Var | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.87 |
Edr | 0.42 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.88 |
Beta | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
Svar | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
Dbeta | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.58 |
Weekly | |||||||
Vol | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.78 |
Var | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
Edr | 0.53 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.88 |
Beta | 0.17 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.11 |
Svar | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.78 |
Dbeta | 0.45 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.76 |
Monthly | |||||||
Vol | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
Var | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.66 |
Edr | 0.09 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.87 |
Beta | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
Svar | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.75 |
Dbeta | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.74 |
Yearly | |||||||
Vol | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.81 |
Var | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.87 |
Edr | 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
Beta | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
Svar | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.78 |
Dbeta | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.70 |
Fourth, the daily, weekly, monthy and yearly R2 values are presented for the case with α ≠ 0 and dollar denominated returns.
US | UK | Germany | France | Hungary | Poland | Czeck Rep. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily | |||||||
Vol | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.79 |
Var | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
Edr | 0.42 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
Beta | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.16 |
Svar | 0.58 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.44 |
Dbeta | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.57 |
Weekly | |||||||
Vol | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.73 |
Var | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
Edr | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.88 |
Beta | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
Svar | 0.51 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.80 |
Dbeta | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.75 |
Monthly | |||||||
Vol | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
Var | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.82 |
Edr | 0.09 | 0.87 | 0.12 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.11 | 0.91 |
Beta | 0.02 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.32 |
Svar | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
Dbeta | 0.39 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
Yearly | |||||||
Vol | 0.45 | 0.78 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
Var | 0.44 | 0.81 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.89 |
Edr | 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.98 |
Beta | 0.16 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Svar | 0.42 | 0.77 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.90 |
Dbeta | 0.37 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.84 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ormos, M., Timotity, D. Expected downside risk and asset prices: characteristics of emerging and developed European markets. Empirica 44, 529–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9329-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9329-3