Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 291–322 | Cite as

Factor decomposition of the wealth distribution in the euro area

  • Peter Lindner
Original Paper

Abstract

Economic policy often targets specific components of the household balance sheet such as policies supporting the financing of real estate or setting the interest rate. To understand the potential impact of these policy measures on the overall distribution of wealth, this paper investigates the link between components of wealth and the overall distribution of wealth, using factor decomposition methods. Applying methods from the literature and a new decomposition approach based on the recentered influence function, it uses the newly published data provided by the Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Specifically, the paper studies the (marginal) contributions of and the elasticity with respect to components of the household’s balance sheet for the euro area as a whole as well as for 15 euro area countries. We find some factors (such as wealth held in households’ main residence) to contribute a higher proportion to inequality while others (such as risky financial assets) display only a relatively weak contribution. In addition, elasticities reveal a diverging impact of different components on the wealth distribution. Furthermore, the relative contribution and the point elasticities of the components of total wealth differ across euro area countries, indicating regionally distinctive impacts of policy measures.

Keywords

Decomposition Distribution Wealth Shapley value RIF HFCS 

JEL Classification

D31 D63 

References

  1. Araar A (2006) On the decomposition of the gini coefficient: an exact approach, with an illustration using Cameroonian data. Working paper 0602, CIRPEEGoogle Scholar
  2. Azpitarte F (2008) The household wealth distribution in Spain: the role of housing and financial wealth. ECINEQ working paper series 83Google Scholar
  3. Berrebi ZM, Silber J (1985) The Gini coefficient and negative income: a comment. Oxf Econ Pap 37(3):525–526Google Scholar
  4. Bilias Y, Georgarakos D, Haliassos M (2005) Equity culture and the distribution of wealth. CFS working paper series 2005/20, Center for Financial Studies (CFS)Google Scholar
  5. Bourguignon F, Ferreira F, Leite P (2008) Beyond Oaxaca–Blinder: accounting for differences in household income distributions. J Econ Inequal 6(2):117–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandolini A, Cannari L, D’Alessio G, Faiella I (2004) Household wealth distribution in Italy in the 1990s. Temi di discussione (economic working papers) 530, Bank of ItalyGoogle Scholar
  7. Celestin CN, Clovis MW (2012) Inequality of Cameroonian households: an analysis based on the Shapley–Shorrocks decomposition. Int J Econ Finance 4(6):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chantreuil F, Trannoy A (2013) Inequality decomposition values: the trade-off between marginality and efficiency. J Econ Inequal 11(1):83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen C-N, Tsaur T-W, Rhai T-S (1982) The Gini coefficient and negative income. Oxf Econ Pap 34(3):473–478Google Scholar
  10. Chernozhukov V, Fernandez-Val I, Melly B (2009) Inference on counterfactual distributions. CeMMAP working papers CWP09/09, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal StudiesGoogle Scholar
  11. Chernozhukov V, Fernández-Val I, Melly B (2013) Inference on counterfactual distributions. Econometrica 81(6):2205–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowell FA, Fiorio CV (2009) Inequality decomposition—a reconciliation. LSE STICERD research paper, (DARP 100), pp 1–32Google Scholar
  13. Cowell FA, Flachaire E (2002) Sensitivity of inequality measures to extreme values. STICERD—distributional analysis research programme papers 60. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSEGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowell FA, Flachaire E (2007) Income distribution and inequality measurement: the problem of extreme values. J Econ 141(2):1044–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ECB (2013a) The Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey—results from the first wave. Statistics paper series 2, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  16. ECB (2013b) The Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey Methodological—report for the first wave. Statistics paper series 1, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  17. Essama-Nssah B, Lambert PJ (2011) Influence functions for distributional statistics. Working papers 236, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic InequalityGoogle Scholar
  18. Fei JCH, Ranis G, Kuo SWY (1978) Growth and the family distribution of income by factor components. Q J Econ 92(1):17–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fessler P, Lindner P, Segalla E (2013) Household structure and the distribution of net wealth—evidence from the Euro Area, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  20. Fields GS (2003) Accounting for income inequality and its changes: a new method, with application to the distribution of earnings in the United States. Res Labor Econ 22:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiorio CV (2006) Understanding inequality trends: microsimulation decomposition for Italy. STICERD: distributional analysis research programme papers 78. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSEGoogle Scholar
  22. Firpo S, Fortin N, Lemieux T (2007) Decomposing wage distributions using recentered influence function regressions. Unpublished manuscript, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fortin NM, Lemieux T, Firpo S (2009) Unconditional quantile regression. Econometrica 77(3):953–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortin NM, Lemieux T, Firpo S (2011) Decomposition methods in economics. Handb Labor Econ 4:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fournier M (2001) Inequality decomposition by factor component: a rank-correlation approach illustrated on the Taiwanese case. Louvain Econ Rev 67(4):381–404Google Scholar
  26. Fräßdorf A, Grabka M, Schwarze J (2011) The impact of household capital income on income inequalitya factor decomposition analysis for the UK, Germany and the USA. J Econ Inequal 9(1):35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gale W, Pence K (2006) Are successive generations getting wealthier, and if so, why? Evidence from the 1990s. MPRA paper 55502, University Library of Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunatilaka R, Chotikapanich D (2009) Accounting for Sri Lanka’s expenditure inequality 1980–2002: regression-based decomposition approaches. Rev Income Wealth 55(4):882–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Juhn C, Murphy KM, Pierce B (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. J Polit Econ 101(3):410–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanbur R (2006) The policy significance of inequality decompositions. J Econ Inequal 4(3):367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert PJ, Aronson RJ (1993) Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited. Econ J 103(420):1221–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lerman RI, Yitzhaki S (1985) Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. Rev Econ Stat 67(1):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindner P (2011) Decomposition of wealth and income using micro data from Austria. OeNB working papers 173, Oesterreichische NationalbankGoogle Scholar
  34. López-Feldman A, Mora J, Taylor EJ (2006) Does natural resource extraction mitigate poverty and inequality? Evidence from rural Mexico and a Lacandona rainforest community. Agriculture and resource economics working papers 005Google Scholar
  35. Machado JAF, Mata J (2005) Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression. J Appl Econom 20(4):445–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mookherjee D, Shorrocks AF (1982) A decomposition analysis of the trend in UK income inequality. Econ J 92(368):886–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morduch J, Sicular T (2002) Rethinking inequality decomposition, with evidence from China. Econ J 112(476):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Okamoto M (2011) Source decomposition of changes in income inequality: the integral-based approach and its approximation by the chained Shapley-value approach. J Econ Inequal 9(2):145–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul S (2004) Income sources effects on inequality. J Dev Econ 73(1):435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubin DB, Little RJA (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Sastre M, Trannoy A (2002) Shapley inequality decomposition by factor components: some methodological issues. J Econ Suppl. 9:51–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shapley LF (1953) A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn H, Tucker AW (eds) Contribution to the theory of games, vol 2. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Shorrocks AF (1982) Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica 50(1):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shorrocks AF (2013) Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. J Econ Inequal 11(1):99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sierminska E, Doorley K (2012) Decomposing household wealth portfolios across countries: an age-old question? CEPS/INSTEAD working paper series 32, CEPS/INSTEADGoogle Scholar
  46. Sierminska E, Frick JR, Grabka MM (2008) Examining the gender wealth gap in Germany. IZA discussion papers 3573, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  47. Silber J (1989) Factor components, population subgroups and the computation of the Gini index of inequality. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stich A (1996) Inequality and negative income. J Ital Stat Soc 5(3):297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu K (2004) How has the literature on Gini’s index evolved in the past 80 years? Economics working paper, Dalhousie UniversityGoogle Scholar
  50. Yitzhaki S (1998) More than a dozen alternative ways of spelling Gini. Res Econ Inequal 8:13–30Google Scholar
  51. Yun M-S (2006) Earnings inequality in USA, 1969–99: comparing inequality using earnings equations. Rev Income Wealth 52(1):127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Analysis DivisionOesterreichische NationalbankViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations