Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 87–108 | Cite as

Optimal fixed cost subsidies in Melitz-type models

  • Benjamin JungEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper analyzes the reallocation and welfare effects of fixed cost subsidies in a Melitz-type model. In a closed economy, the planner trades off product variety and average productivity effects. Neither subsidies on entry fixed costs nor on operating fixed costs are welfare enhancing. These results reflect the Pareto optimality of the laissez faire equilibrium. In a “small” open economy à la Demidova and Rodríguez-Clare (J Int Econ 78(1):100–112, 2009), an entry fixed cost subsidy does not enhance welfare, while a small operating fixed cost subsidy does. Only the latter affects the relative attractiveness of exporting. The average firm thus realloactes labor from export to domestic activity and operates at a smaller scale, which allows for a larger increase in domestic product variety than in the closed economy.

Keywords

Monopolistic competition Heterogeneous firms Industrial policy Subsidies 

JEL-Classification

F12 F13 H25 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Hartmut Egger, Gabriel Felbermayr, Wilhelm Kohler, Mario Larch, Philip Schröder, Marcel Smolka, and Jens Südekum for stimulating discussions, and participants at the Annual Meetings of the Austrian Economic Association in Vienna, the Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics in Fribourg, the European Economic Association in Glasgow, and the European Trade Study Group in Lausanne for helpful comments. All remaining errors are mine.

References

  1. Ardelean A (2009) How strong is the love of variety? Purdue University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin RE, Forslid R (2009) Trade liberalization with heterogeneous firms. Rev Dev Econ 14(2):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Q J Econ 118(3):879–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chor D (2009) Subsidies for FDI. Implications from a model with heterogeneous firms. J Int Econ 78:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsetti G, Martin P, Pesenti P (2007) Productivity, terms of trade and the 'home market effect’. J Int Econ 73:99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demidova S, Rodríguez-Clare A (2009) Trade policy under firm-level heterogeneity in a small economy. J Int Econ 78(1):100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3):297–308Google Scholar
  8. Egger H, Falkinger J (2006) The role of public infrastructure and subsidies for firm location and international outsourcing. Eur Econ Rev 50:1993–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egger H, Kreickemeier U (2009) Firm heterogeneity and the labour market effects of trade liberalisation. Int Econ Rev 50(1):187–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felbermayr G, Jung B (2009) Sorting it out: technical barriers to trade and industry productivity. Open Econ Rev. doi: 10.1007/s11079-009-9114-z
  11. Felbermayr G, Prat J (2007) Product market regulation, firm selection and unemployment. IZA Discussion paper no. 2754Google Scholar
  12. Flam R, Helpman E (1987) Industrial policy under monopolistic competition. J Int Econ 22:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gros D (1987) A note on the optimal tariff, retaliation and the welfare loss from tariff wars in a framework with intra-industry trade. J Int Econ 23:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krugman PR (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70(5):950–959Google Scholar
  15. Mayer T, Ottaviano GIP (2008) The happy few: the internationalisation of European firms. Interecon Rev Eur Econ Policy 43(3):135–148Google Scholar
  16. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pflüger M, Südekum J (2009) Subsidizing firm entry in open economies. IZA Discussion paper no. 4384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations