Abstract
Pakistan is the fourth largest yarn producer in the world heavily that relies on cotton crop which receives a substantial 62% of all pesticide applications. The present study was conducted to quantify the levels of pesticides such as bifenthrin, spirotetramat, pyriproxyfen, imidacloprid, and diafenthiuron in soil and plants residue at selected cotton fields of Multan District, Pakistan. In addition to pesticides, the assessment of heavy metal concentration was also conducted in order to determine the overall risks that these compounds to both plants and human population. For this analysis, 20 soil samples and 10 plant samples were collected from 10 selected cotton fields. Pesticides and heavy metals in soil and plant samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES), respectively. It was observed that all samples collected from selected fields contained pesticide residue in top soil (0–15 cm). However, no pesticides were detected in the lower soil layer (16–30 cm). In case of heavy metals, the highest concentration of Fe, Pb, and Mn was observed in both soil and plant residue samples. The heavy metals were found in the order of Fe > Mn > Pb > Zn > Cu > Cd in the soil. The total carcinogenic risk values for a few pesticides were found to range from 10−6 to 10−2, indicating that residents of the study area have low to higher chances of developing cancer. A positive correlation was observed among the pesticides (r = 0.18–0.95) as well as in metals related parameters (r = 0.49–0.96), where a weak negative correlation was found among metal to pesticide parameters except Pd where the maximum r value was 0.62. In general, the finding of this study encourages the development and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices that lower the dependence on toxic pesticides and endorse environmentally friendly alternatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Any detail in data may be available on request from the corresponding and principal authors.
References
Alam, R., Ahmed, Z., & Howladar, M. F. (2020). Evaluation of heavy metal contamination in water, soil, and plant around the open landfill site Mogla Bazar in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100311.
Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S. T., Qureshi, S. R., & Wang, M. Q. (2021). Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics., 9(3), 42.
Ara, T., Nisa, W. U., Anjum, M., Riaz, L., Saleem, A. R., & Hayat, M. T. (2021). Hexachlorocyclohexane toxicity in water bodies of Pakistan: Challenges and possible reclamation technologies. Water Science and Technology, 83(10), 2345–2362.
Arshad, M., Suhail, A., Gogi, M. D., Yaseen, M., Asghar, M., Tayyib, M., & Ullah, U. N. (2009). Farmers’ perceptions of insect pests and pest management practices in Bt cotton in the Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Pest Management, 55(1), 1–10.
Baig, I. A., Ullah, S., Nasir, S., & Rehman, W. U. (2022). Impact of major public policies on cotton production in Pakistan. 2nd RASTA CONFERENCE, June 1-2, June 2022. Islamabad.
Bakhsh, K., Ahmad, N., Tabasum, S., Hassan, S., & Hassan, I. (2017). Health hazards and adoption of personal protective equipment during cotton harvesting in Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 1058–1064.
Brubaker, C. L., Bourland, F. M., & Wendel, J. F. (1999). The origin and domestication of cotton. Cotton: Origin, history, technology, and production. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3–31.
Cao, L., Chen, B., Zheng, L., Wang, D., Liu, F., & Huang, Q. (2015). Assessment of potential dermal and inhalation exposure of workers to the insecticide imidacloprid using whole-body dosimetry in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 27, 139–146.
Farooq, O., Mubeen, K., Khan, A. A., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Sowing methods for cotton production. In Cotton Production and Uses (pp. 45–57). Springer, Singapore.
Geneteau, A., Varloud, M., Ameller, T., & Kaltsatos, V. (2015, July). In-vitro assessment of dinotefuran and pyriproxyfen diffusion through human skin after topical administration of Vectra® Felis. In Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 38, 139–139 USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gu, Y. G. (2021). Risk assessment of eight metals and their mixtures to aquatic biota in sediments with diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT): A case study in Pearl River intertidal zone. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33(1), 1–1.
Hughes, M. F., & Edwards, B. C. (2010). In vitro dermal absorption of pyrethroid pesticides in human and rat skin. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 246(1–2), 29–37.
Kanungo, D., & Moretto, A. (2010). Spirotetramat. Evaluations, 369–436.
Khan, M. I., Shoukat, M. A., Cheema, S. A., Arif, H. N., Niazi, N. K., Azam, M., & Qadri, R. (2020). Use, contamination and exposure of pesticides in Pakistan: a review. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57(1).
Khan, M. J., Zia, M. S., & Qasim, M. (2010). Use of pesticides and their role in environmental pollution. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 72, 122–128.
Klute, A., & Page, A. L. (1986). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods; Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc..
Li, Z., Ma, Z., van der Kuijp, T. J., Yuan, Z., & Huang, L. (2014). A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: Pollution and health risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 468, 843–853.
Liu, H., Wang, P., Zhou, Z., & Liu, D. (2017). Enantioselective dissipation of pyriproxyfen in soils and sand. Chirality, 29(7), 358–368.
Marrazza, G. (2014). Piezoelectric biosensors for organophosphate and carbamate pesticides: A review. Biosensors, 4(3), 301–317.
Morrison, C., Sun, H., Yao, Y., Loomis, R. A., & Buhro, W. E. (2020). Methods for the ICP-OES analysis of semiconductor materials. Chemistry of Materials, 32(5), 1760–1768.
Mouta, E. R., Soares, M. R., & Casagrande, J. C. (2008). Copper adsorption as a function of solution parameters of variable charge soils. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 19, 996–1009.
Mukherjee, I., Singh, R., & Govil, J. N. (2010). Risk assessment of a synthetic pyrethroid, bifenthrin on pulses. Bulletin of Environment Contamination and Toxicology, 84(3), 294–300.
Rafique, N., & Tariq, S. R. (2016). Distribution and source apportionment studies of heavy metals in soil of cotton/wheat fields. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(5), 309.
Tariq, M. I., Afzal, S., Hussain, I., & Sultana, N. (2007). Pesticides exposure in Pakistan: A review. Environment International, 33(8), 1107–1122.
Tariq, S. R., Shafiq, M., & Chotana, G. A. (2016). Distribution of heavy metals in the soils associated with the commonly used pesticides in cotton fields. Scientifica, 2016.
Toth, G., Hermann, T., Da Silva, M. R., & Montanarella, L. J. (2016). Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environment International., 88, 299–309.
Toumi, K., Joly, L., Vleminckx, C., & Schiffers, B. (2018). Assessment of exposure of workers to pesticide residues in tomato greenhouses. In 23rd National Symposium for Applied Biological Sciences.
USEPA. (2009). Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Human health evaluation manual (F, supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment). EPA/540/R/070/002, Vol. I. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/partf_200901_final.pdf. Retrieved in December 23, 2022.
USEPA, A. (1989). Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume I: human health evaluation manual (part a) (p. 205). EPA/540/1-89/002.
USEPA, U. (2001). Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. Peer Review Draft, OSWER, 9355, 4–24.
Wang, B., Wu, C., Liu, W., Teng, Y., Luo, Y., Christie, P., & Guo, D. (2016). Levels and patterns of organochlorine pesticides in agricultural soils in an area of extensive historical cotton cultivation in Henan province, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(7), 6680–6689.
Zuvela, P., Skoczylas, M., Jay Liu, J., Ba̧czek, T., Kaliszan, R., Wong, M. W., & Buszewski, B. (2019). Column characterization and selection systems in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Chemical Reviews, 119(6), 3674–3729.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge ISES, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, and Nuchem (Pvt.) Ltd. Multan, Pakistan for providing lab facilities.
Funding
This work is conducted and supported by Environmental Sciences Laboratory, ISES, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AP has prepared the first draft of the article and conducted all experimental work. AK supervised the whole research work and assisted in providing laboratory facilities. The technical and language editing was performed by RN, MA, and SM provided support in experimental planning, proofread the manuscript, and finally edited the draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Parveen, A., Anjum, M., Mahmood, S. et al. Environmental implication and cancer risk assessment of residual pollutants in cotton crop: a case study of Multan District, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11710-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11710-y