Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying the influence of transmission path characteristics on urban railway noise

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Every ambient noise study employs the source-path-receiver structure to explore the overall behaviour of sound. Noise levels are affected by changes in distance, intervening barriers, and atmospheric conditions along the transmission path between the source and the receiver. The objective of this study is to quantify the influence of transmission path characteristics for a realistic time-varying moving line source. In this context, railway noise was considered to explore the variance of noise in an urban setting over a variety of measuring distances, including 25, 50, 100, and 200 m, with variables such as air temperature, humidity, and wind condition. The data corresponding to 106 trains was collected for analysis, and it was observed that the effect of the wind was more significant for larger distances between the source and the receiver. When the sound levels were measured in two opposite wind directions, a considerable noise level difference was observed. For every 1 m/s increase in wind speed, within a distance of 50 m, the average sound attenuation induced by the upwind phenomena was 0.2 dBA. The impact of air temperature changes on received sound level from a moving source was insignificant within the range of temperatures considered in the study. The effect of humidity is less at shorter distances but at larger distances, increasingly attenuates noise levels. Analysis of variance was performed on the selected variables to determine whether the means of each group were significantly different from each other and found that train speed had a more significant impact on railway noise compared to other parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Broadbent, R. A., Thompson, D. J., & Jones, C. J. C. (2009). Evaluation of the effects of temperature on railpad properties, rail decay rates and noise radiation. In proceedings of the Sixteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Krakow, Poland.

  • Cheinet, S., Cosnefroy, M., Königstein, F., Rickert, W., Christoph, M., Collier, S. L., & Wilson, D. K. (2018). An experimental study of the atmospheric-driven variability of impulse sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 822–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Tang, B., Liu, T., Xiang, H., Sheng, Q., & Gong, H. (2020). Modeling traffic noise in a mountainous city using artificial neural networks and gradient correction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, P., Talukdar, S., Ziaul, S. K., Das, S., & Pal, S. (2019). Noise mapping and assessing vulnerability in meso level urban environment of Eastern India. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., & Cooper, J. (2013). Effects of different meteorological conditions on wind turbine noise. Proceedings of Acoustics, Victor Harbor, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, O. A. (2008). Sound transmission through water–air interfaces: New insights into an old problem. Contemporary Physics, 49(2), 105–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Agustina, L., Dance, S., & Shield, B. (2014). The effects of air temperature and humidity on the acoustic design of voice alarm systems on underground stations. Applied acoustics, 76, 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. M. (1966). Absorption of sound in air versus humidity and temperature. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40(1), 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. M. (1971). Effects of humidity on the velocity of sound in air. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(3B), 890–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hole, L. R., & Mohr, H. M. (1999). Modeling of sound propagation in the atmospheric boundary layer: Application of the MIUU mesoscale model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D10), 11891–11901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornikx, M., Dohmen, M., Conen, K., van Hooff, T., & Blocken, B. (2018). The wind effect on sound propagation over urban areas: Predictions for generic urban sections. Building and Environment, 144, 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosier, R. N., & Hilton, D. A. (1975). Some effects of the atmosphere and microphone placement on aircraft flyover noise measurements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(S1), S70–S70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 1996-2:2017 Acoustics – Description, measurement, and assessment of environmental noise – Part 2: Determination of sound pressure levels, 2017, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO 9613-1:1993. Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere, 1993, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO 9613-2:1996. Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: General method of calculation, 1996, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Larsen, O. N., & Radford, C. (2018). Acoustic conditions affecting sound communication in air and underwater. In Effects of anthropogenic noise on animals (pp. 109–144). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, C., & Israelsson, S. (1991). Effects of meteorological conditions and source height on sound propagation near the ground. Applied Acoustics, 33(2), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morfey, C. L. (2001). Dictionary of acoustics. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowoświat, A. (2022). Impact of temperature and relative humidity on reverberation time in a reverberation room. Buildings, 12(8), 1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocker, C., & Pannert, W. (2020). Acoustic ray method derived with the concept of analogue gravity for the calculation of the sound field due to rotating sound sources. Applied Acoustics, 168, 107422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhlund, O., & Larsson, C. (2015). Meteorological effects on wind turbine sound propagation. Applied Acoustics, 89, 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshima, T., & Ii, M. (2013). Field measurements on wind effects to propagation of road traffic noise over open and flat ground. Applied Acoustics, 74(1), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pàmies, T., Romeu, J., Genescà, M., & Arcos, R. (2014). Active control of aircraft fly-over sound transmission through an open window. Applied Acoustics, 84, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poletti, C., Buchwald, B., Lewin, P., & Harris, C. M. (1958). Handbook of noise control. Columbia Law Rev, 58, 580. https://doi.org/10.2307/1119589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renterghem, T. V., Botteldooren, D., & Lercher, P. (2007). Comparison of measurements and predictions of sound propagation in a valley-slope configuration in an inhomogeneous atmosphere. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5), 2522–2533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report by Indian railways. (2022). Indian Railways Annual Reports and Accounts (2021-2022). Ministry of Railways. https://indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/view_section.jsp?id=0,1,304,366,554

  • Scabbia, G., & Heggy, E. (2018). Quantifying subsurface propagation losses for VHF radar sounding waves in hyper-arid terrains. In IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (pp. 6800–6803). IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Vijay, R., Sardar, V. K., Sohony, R. A., & Gupta, A. (2010). Development of noise simulation model for stationary and mobile sources: A GIS-based approach. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 15, 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soni, A. R., Makde, K., Amrit, K., Vijay, R., & Kumar, R. (2022). Noise prediction and environmental noise capacity for urban traffic of Mumbai. Applied Acoustics, 188, 108516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squicciarini, G., Thompson, D. J., Toward, M. G., & Cottrell, R. A. (2016). The effect of temperature on railway rolling noise. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 230(8), 1777–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, L. C., & Bass, H. E. (2004). Atmospheric absorption in the atmosphere up to 160 km. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(3), 1012–1032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S., & Shiraishi, B. (2008). Wind effects on noise propagation for complicated geographical and road configurations. Applied Acoustics, 69(11), 1038–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trikootam, S. C., & Hornikx, M. (2019). The wind effect on sound propagation over urban areas: Experimental approach with an uncontrolled sound source. Building and Environment, 149, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO guidelines for Noise. (2017). Summary of the WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region (2018). WBM Acoustics consultants Accessed 2 January 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, G. S., & Embleton, T. F. (1985). Variation of the speed of sound in air with humidity and temperature. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(5), 1710–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Wei, J., Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Chen, X., Yan, Q., & Guo, J. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of the vibration and noise of wind turbine drivetrains. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 48, 101629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Shri Y. Yogananda Babu, Deputy Chief Engineer, South Central Railway Zone of Indian Railways, for his support in collecting train noise data. The authors acknowledge the support provided by the research scholars of the National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, India, in data collection.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and writing—original draft preparation have been done by Boddu Sudhir Kumar. Writing—review and editing and supervision of the work were done by Venkaiah Chowdary.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boddu Sudhir Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B.S., Chowdary, V. Quantifying the influence of transmission path characteristics on urban railway noise. Environ Monit Assess 195, 996 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11557-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11557-3

Keywords

Navigation