Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climatic drought impacts on key ecosystem services of a low mountain region in Germany

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency of extreme weather events has increased in the latest years in Europe. The recent consecutive droughts caused severe damage in many sectors and underlined the demand for adaptation. There is a need for a better understanding of the response of ecosystems to climate change and the consequences for key ecosystem services, such as water supply and carbon sequestration, at a local and regional scale. This paper aims to support decision-making for climate adaptation in a low-mountainous region of central Germany. We analysed the temperature and precipitation trends and drought conditions. The response of two key services (surface water provision and carbon sequestration) to droughts is estimated using an ecosystem service model. The spatially averaged water yield, net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and soil moisture are assessed and compared for the five worst droughts with long-term averages to identify the vulnerable areas and ecosystems. The temperature increased on seasonal and annual scales, while precipitation decreased in some areas in summer and increased in winter and annually. The standardised precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI) showed worsening drought conditions, especially after the late 1980s. Droughts caused a reduction of water yield by 54%, NEP by 18%, and upper zone soil moisture by 13%. The impacts varied spatially, with the central region being worst affected, while the southern part was relatively more resilient. Adaptation is urgently needed to reduce drought risks and enhance climate resilience. Adaptive measures can include amending crop rotations, introducing more drought-tolerant varieties, upgrading agriculture and food industry technology, increasing mixed forests, and reducing non-native tree species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The datasets used for analyses and model-based assessment are publicly available from the state authority and project website.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Dr Ge Sun and Dr Ning Liu for their invaluable support and advice on applying the WaSSI model. Finally, we thank Prof. Edeltraud Guenther for her constructive comments to improve the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the frame of the funding initiative Regional Information on Climate Action (RegIKlim).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Abdulhakeem Al-Qubati led in data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. Lulu Zhang was involved in planning, supervising, and revising the work. Lulu Zhang and Karim Pyarali helped with data collection and analysis. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lulu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Goodness-of-fit metrics.

Appendix. Goodness-of-fit metrics.

Table 5 Equations and performance rating for the goodness-of-fit metrics

In the equations above, \(n\) is the number of monthly measurements; \({M}_{i}\) and \(\overline{M}\) are the measured value in month \(i\), and the mean value of the observation, respectively; \({S}_{i}\) and \(\overline{S}\) are the simulated variable in month \(i\) and the mean value of the simulated variable, respectively. \({\sigma }_{M}\) and \({\sigma }_{S}\) denote the standard deviation of the measured and simulated variables, respectively, while \({\mu }_{M}\) and \({\mu }_{S}\) denote the average of the measured and simulated variables, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Qubati, A., Zhang, L. & Pyarali, K. Climatic drought impacts on key ecosystem services of a low mountain region in Germany. Environ Monit Assess 195, 800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11397-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11397-1

Keywords

Navigation