Abstract
Drought has major consequences for agricultural activity, economy, and the environment. For improved drought management, it is necessary to assess drought severity, frequency, and the potential of drought occurrence. The purpose of this study is to use drought indices, standardized precipitation index (SPI), and vegetation condition index (VCI) to characterize the severity of drought and investigate the association between drought severity and subjective well-being among local farmers. The SPI was used to quantify precipitation deficits at various time scales, while the VCI was utilized to monitor crop and vegetation drought conditions. Throughout the period 2000–2017, satellite data were incorporated, as well as a household survey of rice farmers in the dry zone research region in northeastern Thailand. The findings suggest that extreme droughts occur more frequently in the central part of the northeastern region of Thailand than in the rest of the region. The influence of drought on farmers’ wellbeing was evaluated at various drought severity levels. Drought and overall wellbeing are strongly linked at the household level. Thai farmers in drought-prone areas are dissatisfied with their livelihoods more than farmers in less-affected area. It is intriguing that farmers who live in drought-prone areas are more content with their lives, their communities, and their occupations than farmers who live in less drought-prone areas. In this context, using proper drought indices could potentially improve the utility of governmental interventions and community-based programs targeted at assisting drought-affected people.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
We declared that the datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Askarimarnani, S. S., Kiem, A. S., & Twomey, C. R. (2021). Comparing the performance of drought indicators in Australia from 1900 to 2018. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E912–E934.
Bache, I. (2013). Measuring quality of life for public policy: An idea whose time has come? Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.699658
Bachmair, S., Tanguy, M., Hannaford, J., & Stahl, K. (2018). How well do meteorological indicators represent agricultural and forest drought across Europe? Environmental Research Letters, 13, 034042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafda
Bedran-Martins, A. M., Lemos, M. C., & Philippi, A. (2018). Relationship between subjective well-being and material quality of life in face of climate vulnerability in NE Brazil. Climatic Change, 147, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2105-y
Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
Bhuiyan, C., Saha, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, N., & Kogan, F. N. (2017). Analyzing the impact of thermal stress on vegetation health and agricultural drought – A case study from Gujarat, India. Gisscience & Remote Sensing, 54, 678–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1309737
Dhakar, R., Sehgal, V. K., & Pradhan, S. (2013). Study on inter-seasonal and intra-seasonal relationships of meteorological and agricultural drought indices in the Rajasthan State of India. Journal of Arid Environments, 97, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.06.001
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 70, 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038899
Dolan, P., & Kahneman, D. (2008). Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. The Economic Journal, 118, 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02110.x
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279411000833
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.
Dutta, D., Kundu, A., Patel, N. R., Saha, S. K., & Siddiqui, A. R. (2015). Assessment of agricultural drought in Rajasthan (India) using remote sensing derived Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.006
Fischer, R., & Van de Vliert, E. (2011). Does climate undermine subjective well-being? A 58-Nation Study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407075
Giddings, L., Soto, M., Rutherford, B. M., & Maarouf, A. (2005). Standardized precipitation index zones for México. Atmosfera, 18, 33–56.
Gidey, E., Dikinya, O., Sebego, R., Segosebe, E., & Zenebe, A. (2018). Modeling the spatio-temporal meteorological drought characteristics using the standardized precipitation index (SPI) in Raya and its environs, northern Ethiopia. Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748018-0057-7
Glenn, E., Huete, A., Nagler, P., & Nelson, S. (2008). Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors, 8, 2136–2160. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8042136
Gomes, A. C. C., Bernardo, N., & Alcântara, E. (2017). Accessing the southeastern Brazil 2014 drought severity on the vegetation health by satellite image. Natural Hazards, 89, 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3029-6
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
Ionita, M., Scholz, P., & Chelcea, S. (2016). Assessment of droughts in Romania using the Standardized Precipitation Index. Natural Hazards, 81, 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2141-8
Jain, S. K., Keshri, R., Goswami, A., & Sarkar, A. (2010). Application of meteorological and vegetation indices for evaluation of drought impact: A case study for Rajasthan, India. Natural Hazards, 54, 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9493-x
Johnston, K., Ver Hoef, J. M., Krivoruchko, K., & Lucas, N. (2001). Using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst, GIS by ESRI. https://dusk.geo.orst.edu/gis/geostat_analyst.pdf
Juliani, B. H. T., & Okawa, C. M. P. (2017). Application of a standardized precipitation index for meteorological drought analysis of the semi-arid climate influence in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Hydrology, 4(2), 26.
Karavitis, C. A., Alexandris, S., Tsesmelis, D. E., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2011). Application of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) in Greece. Water, 3, 787–805. https://doi.org/10.3390/w3030787
Karnieli, A., Agam, N., Pinker, R. T., Anderson, M., Imhoff, M. L., Gutman, G. G., ... & Goldberg, A. (2010). Use of NDVI and land surface temperature for drought assessment: Merits and limitations. Journal of Climate, 23(3), 618–633.
Keshavarz, M., Karami, E., & Zibaei, M. (2014). Adaptation of Iranian farmers to climate variability and change. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0558-8
Khan, S., Gabriel, H. F., & Rana, T. (2008). Standard precipitation index to track drought and assess impact of rainfall on watertables in irrigation areas. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 22, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-008-9049-3
Kogan, F. N. (1995). Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for drought detection. Advances in Space Research, 15, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00079-T
Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). Human well-being and climate change mitigation: Human well-being and climate change mitigation. WIREs Climate Change, 8, e485. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.485
Larson, S. (2013). Wellbeing assessment for climate change. The Cairns Institute. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2439.7444
Layard, P. R. G. (2011). Happiness: lessons from a new science; [inside: the seven causes of happiness], New ed.: fully rev. and updated. ed, Penguin psychology. Penguin Books, London.
Li, C., Leal Filho, W., Yin, J., Hu, R., Wang, J., Yang, C., Yin, S., Bao, Y., & Ayal, D. Y. (2018). Assessing vegetation response to multi-time-scale drought across inner Mongolia plateau. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.113
Lohmann, P., Pondorfer, A., & Rehdanz, K. (2019). Natural hazards and well-being in a small-scale island society. Ecological Economics, 159, 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.023
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
Ma’rufah, U., Hidayat, R., & Prasasti, I. (2017). Analysis of relationship between meteorological and agricultural drought using standardized precipitation index and vegetation health index. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 54, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012008
Maddison, D., & Rehdanz, K. (2011). The impact of climate on life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 70, 2437–2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.027
Mckee, B. T, Doesken, J. N. & Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales, Proceeding of the Eight Conference on Applied Climatology, 17–22 January 1993, Anaheim, California.
Mongkolsawat, C. (2006). Northeast Thailand: Spatial potentials for development. Khon Kaen Karn Pim Press.
Nawata, E., Nagata, Y., Sasaki, A., Iwama, K., & Sakuratani, T. (2005). Mapping of climatic data in Northeast Thailand: Rainfall. Tropics, 14, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.14.191
Orachos, N., & Carl, P. (2014). Adoption of drought-tolerant rice in Thailand: Participatory varietal selection and implications for breeding programs. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2013.0504
Pei, F., Wu, C., Liu, X., Li, X., Yang, K., Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Xu, L., & Xia, G. (2018). Monitoring the vegetation activity in China using vegetation health indices. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 248, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.001
Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2005). Climate and happiness. Ecological Economics, 52, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.015
Robinson, S. (2020). Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. WIREs Climate Change, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.653
Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple or a simplified relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 467–497.
Sekulova, F., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). Floods and happiness: Empirical evidence from Bulgaria. Ecological Economics, 126, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.014
Shiiba, N., Yokoo, H. F., Saengavut, V., & Bumrungkit, S. (2022). Ambiguity aversion and individual adaptation to climate change: Evidence from a farmer survey in northeastern Thailand. Climate Change Economics, 2350005.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox (No. w14282). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Thavorntam, W., Tantemsapya, N., & Armstrong, L. (2015). A combination of meteorological and satellite-based drought indices in a better drought assessment and forecasting in Northeast Thailand. Natural Hazards, 77, 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1501-0
Tian, L., Yuan, S., & Quiring, S. M. (2018). Evaluation of six indices for monitoring agricultural drought in the south-central United States. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.024
Tol, R. S. J. (2005). Emission abatement versus development as strategies to reduce vulnerability to climate change: An application of FUND. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X05002354
Vicente-Serrano, S. M. (2007). Evaluating the impact of drought using remote sensing in a Mediterranean, semi-arid region. Natural Hazards, 40, 173–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0009-7
Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK. Newport: Office for National Statistics
Wanders, N., Van Loon, A. F., & Van Lanen, H. A. (2017). Frequently used drought indices reflect different drought conditions on global scale. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–16.
Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691
Zou, L., Cao, S., & Sanchez-Azofeifa, A. (2020). Evaluating the utility of various drought indices to monitor meteorological drought in Tropical Dry Forests. International Journal of Biometeorology, 64, 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01858-z
Funding
This study was funded by Chiang Mai University and Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The conceptual framework of the study was created by Watinee and Voravee, who also drafted and edited the text. The drought evaluation is carried out by Watinee, who also makes maps and graphs. The household field survey is carried out by Voravee, who also calculates the subjective risk perception. David and Leisa review the manuscript and offer recommendations.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors.” All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The certificate compliance with the ethical standards in human research by Khon Kaen University (number HE613048).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thavorntam, W., Saengavut, V., Armstrong, L.J. et al. Association of farmers’ wellbeing in a drought-prone area, Thailand: applications of SPI and VCI indices. Environ Monit Assess 195, 612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11157-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11157-1