Skip to main content
Log in

Levels and ecological risk of pharmaceuticals in River Sosiani, Kenya

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continued frequent detection of pharmaceuticals in the environment is of major concern due to potential human and ecological risks. This study evaluated 30 antibiotics from 8 classes: sulphonamides (SAs), penicillins (PNs), fluoroquinolones (FQs), macrolides (MLs), lincosamides (LINs), nitroimidazoles (NIs), diaminopyrimidines (DAPs), salfones and 4 anthelmintics benzimidazoles (BZs) in surface water and sediments from River Sosiani in Eldoret, Kenya. Samples were collected during the wet and dry seasons and subjected to solid phase extraction using HLB cartridges. A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method was used for the simultaneous quantification of the compounds. Chromatographic separation was on a reversed-phase Zorkax Eclipse Plus C18 column eluted in a gradient program and compounds detected by mass spectrometer operated in a positive electrospray ionization (+ ESI) mode. Twenty-eight antibiotics were detected in water where 22 had a 100% detection frequency and the remaining 4 showed detection frequencies ranging from 5 to 47%. Three BZs had a 100% detection frequency. Detectable concentrations of the pharmaceuticals in water ranged between 0.1 and 247 ng L−1 and 0.01 and 974 µg kg−1 in the sediments. The sulfonamide, sulfamethoxazole, had the highest concentration in water (247 ng L−1), whereas penicillin G showed the highest concentrations in sediments (414–974 µg kg−1). Quantified pharmaceuticals decreased in the order SAs > DAPs > FQs > ATs > PNs ≈ MCs ≈ LNs > NIs in water, and followed the order PNs > BZs > FQs > MLs > DAPs ≈ LNs > NIs > SAs in sediments. Risk quotients (RQw) showed that sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin were of high ecological risk in the surface water (RQw values of 1.11 and 3.24, respectively), whereas penicillin V, ampicillin, penicillin G, norfloxacin, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, tylosin, and lincomycin were of medium ecological risk in the aquatic system. The findings show high prevalence of pharmaceuticals in surface water and sediments and are therefore potential ecological hazards. Such information is vital when devising mitigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data for the manuscript is available on request.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors are thankful to Africa Centre of Excellence in Phytochemicals, Textile, and Renewable Energy (ACE II-PTRE) for the financial support, National Research Fund (NRF) research grant No. NRF/2/MMC/666 for provision of reference standards and meeting cost of LC–MS/MS analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Catherine Chemtai conducted the sampling, did sample preparations, obtained funding from Africa Centre of Excellence in Phytochemicals, Textile, and Renewable Energy (ACE II-PTRE) for her studies, and wrote the initial manuscript draft. Fredrick O. Kengara and Anastasiah N. Ngigi obtained funds, did project conception and design, provided supervision, and contributed to the editing of the manuscript. Anastasiah N. Ngigi was involved in project administration, method validation, and optimization and carried out data analysis and interpretation. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasiah N. Ngigi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 4384 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chemtai, C., Kengara, F.O. & Ngigi, A.N. Levels and ecological risk of pharmaceuticals in River Sosiani, Kenya. Environ Monit Assess 195, 431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11022-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11022-1

Keywords

Navigation