Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of barrages on assemblage pattern of phytoplankton in tropical river Ganga, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence, abundance, and distribution of phytoplankton have been investigated upstream and downstream of three barrages on the river Ganga at Bijnor, Narora, and Kanpur in Uttar Pradesh, India. A total of 104 phytoplankton species belonging to eight phyla (Bacillariophyta, Charophyta, Chlorophyta, Cryptophyta, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, Miozoa, and Ochrophyta) were identified during the sampling period. During the summer, monsoon, and post-monsoon seasons, the density of phytoplankton (Ind. L−1) ranged from 9.6 × 104 to 2.03 × 107, 9.6 × 104 to 4.5 × 105, and 2.2 × 105 to 2.17 × 106, respectively. The species abundance and the relative abundance showed an increasing trend from the first (Bijnor) to the third (Kanpur) barrage, suggesting a gradual decrease in river flow and an increase in residence time. Phytoplankton cell density in Kanpur, however, was unexpectedly higher and showed eutrophic conditions attributable to elevated organic load and surplus nutrients from the land runoff. One-way ANOVA (post-hoc Tukey test) showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) seasonal variation in temperature, transparency, free CO2, PO43−, and dissolved organic matter. Analysis of Pearson’s correlation coefficient suggested a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) of mostly phytoplanktonic groups with free CO2, CO32−, HCO3, Cl, specific conductivity, total dissolved solids, total hardness, Mg2+, PO43−, and SiO44−. The minimum species diversity was recorded during the monsoon season, while the maximum diversity was reported during the post-monsoon season which might be due to high nutrient load and a high concentration of PO43− post-monsoon. We concluded that aquatic biodiversity and ecological structure could be adversely influenced by a series of obstructed barrages and dams, which influenced the assemblage pattern of phytoplankton communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

The data of the present study are available from ICAR-CIFRI. However, restrictions may be applied to the availability which was used under license for this study. Data can be available from the corresponding author with the permission of the funding agency upon reasonable request.

References

  • Alam, A., Chadha, N. K., Joshi, K. D., Chakraborty, S. K., Sawant, P. B., Kumar, T., Srivastava, K., Das, S. C. S., & Sharma, A. P. (2015). Food and feeding ecology of the non-native Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the River Yamuna, India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B - Biological Sciences, 85(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0338-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A., Gopinath, V., Jha, D. N., Joshi, K. D., Kumar, J., Das, S. C. S., Thakur, V. R., Gupta, M., & Das, B. K. (2020). Food and feeding biology of commercially important freshwater eel, Mastacembelus armatus (LACEPÈDE, 1800) from the Ganga river, India. Oceanography & Fisheries Open Access Journal, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/ofoaj.2020.11.555819

  • Amengual-Morro, C., Moyà Niell, G., & Martínez-Taberner, A. (2012). Phytoplankton as bioindicator for waste stabilization ponds. Journal of Environmental Management, 95(SUPPL.), S71–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.008

  • Atazadeh, E., Gell, P., Mills, K., Barton, A., & Newall, P. (2021). Community structure and ecological responses to hydrological changes in benthic algal assemblages in a regulated river: Application of algal metrics and multivariate techniques in river management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 39805–39825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13546-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantwan, B. (2018). Seasonal variation in phytoplankton density of Bhagirathi River at Uttarkashi (Uttarakhand) India. International Journal for Environmental Rehabilitation and Conservation, 9(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.211

  • Bellinger, E. G., & Sigee, D. C. (2010). Freshwater algae: Identification and use as bioindicator. Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. In Noise Reduction in Speech Processing. Springer.

  • Bravais, A. (1844). Analyse mathématique sur les probabilités des erreurs de situation d’un point. Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. (1990). Comparisons of dominance curves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 138(1–2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(90)90181-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., & Gorley, R. N. (2006). PRIMER v6: User manual/tutorial, Primer E. In Plymouth, UK. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.

  • Cox, E. J. (1996). Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. F., & Cox, M. A. A. (2001). Multidimensional scaling. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P., Servais, P., Smitz, J. S., Billen, G., & Everbecq, E. (1987). Phytoplankton biomass and production in the river Meuse (Belgium). Water Research, 21(12), 1557–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90141-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, V., Dubey, D., & Kumar, S. (2020). Cleaning the River Ganga: Impact of lockdown on water quality and future implications on river rejuvenation strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 15(743), 140756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, B. K., & Srivastava, A. K. (2017). Diatoms as indicator of pollution gradients of the river Ganga, Allahabad, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 4323–4334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1992). Statistical methods for research workers. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (eds) Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_6

  • Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (2007). Statistics (international student edition). Pisani, R. Purves (4th ed.). WW Norton & & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, P., Sinha, A., Sarkar, S. D., Chanu, T. N., Yadav, A. K., Koushlesh, S. K., Borah, S., Das, S. K., & Das, B. K. (2019). Seasonal influence of physicochemical parameters on phytoplankton diversity and assemblage pattern in Kailash Khal, a tropical wetland, Sundarbans. India. Applied Water Science, 9, 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1034-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guiry, M. D., & Guiry, G. M. (2020). Algaebase. World-wide electronic publication. https://www.algaebase.org

  • Guhr, H., Karrasch, B., & Spott, D. (2000). Shifts in the processes of oxygen and nutrient balances in the river Elbe since the transformation of the economic structure. Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica, 28, 155–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, A., Bhat, S. U., & Jehangir, A. (2020). Local determinants influencing stream water quality. Applied Water Science, 10, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1043-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herojeet, R., Rishi, M. S., Lata, R., & Dolma, K. (2017). Quality characterization and pollution source identification of surface water using multivariate statistical techniques, Nalagarh Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India. Applied Water Science, 7, 2137–2156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0600-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inyang, A. I., & Wang, Y. S. (2020). Phytoplankton diversity and community responses to physicochemical variables in mangroves zones of Guang provinces, China. Ecotoxicology, 29, 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-020-02209-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, C. K., Malik, D. S., & Tomar, G. (2018). Seasonal variation in physico-chemical and phytoplankton diversity of Alaknanda River at Garhwal region ( Uttarakhand ). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 6(2), 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y., Moon, C., Kim, H., Yoon, Y., & Kang, C. (2021). Water quality improvement shifts the dominant phytoplankton group from cryptophytes to diatoms in a coastal ecosystem. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.710891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadse, G. K., Patni, P. M., Kelkar, P. S., & Devotta, S. (2008). Qualitative evaluation of Kanhan river and its tributaries flowing over central Indian plateau. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 147, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0100-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, D. R., Bhutiani, R., Matta, G., Singh, V., & Bhadauriya, G. (2012). Study of planktonic diversity of river Ganga from Devprayag to Roorkee, Uttarakhand (India). Environment Conservation Journal, 13(1&2), 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, D. R., Sarkar, P., Gautam, A., & Bhutiani, R. (2007). Fish scales as bio-indicator of water quality of river Ganga. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 134(1–3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9606-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J., Deshmukhe, G., & Chakraborty, S. K. (2015a). Influence of hydrological parameters on phytoplankton diversity, abundance and productivity of Vasai creek, Mumbai. India. Journal of the Kalash Science, 3(3), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J., Deshmukhe, G., Dwivedi, A., Surya, S., Sreekanth, G. B., & Singh, S. K. (2015b). Seasonal and spatial variation of microalgal abundance and chlorophyll a concentration in intertidal rocky pools along Mumbai coast. India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 44(3), 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Kaushal, R. K., & Nigam, A. K. (2015c). Assessment and management of Ganga river water quality using multivariate statistical techniques in India. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 12(4), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-150018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J., Yadav, A. K., & Bhattacharjya, B. K. (2017). A comparative analysis of phytoplankton diversity and abundance during monsoon season in selected beels (wetlands) of Assam, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(4), 2285–2290. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i4.1525

  • Kumar, J., Alam, A., Sarkar, U. K., Das, B. K., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, S. K. (2020). Assessing the phytoplankton community and diversity in relation to physico-chemical parameters in a tropical reservoir of the river Ganga basin. India. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 6(6), 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00470-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J., Alam, A., & Das, B. K. (2022a). The first report on food and feeding habits of yellowtail mullet, Minimugil cascasia (Hamilton, 1822), of the tropical river Ganga, India. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 105, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01263-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C., Ghosh, A., Yash & Bhadury, P. (2022b). Unusual abundance of bloom forming Aulacoseira spp. Diatom populations in an anthropogenically impacted stretch of lower part of the River Ganga. Environmental Research Communications, 4, 045011.

  • Lack, T. J. (1971). Quantitative studies on the phytoplankton of the Rivers Thames and Kennet at Reading. Freshwater Biology, 1, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1971.tb01558.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, D. S., Sharma, M. K., Sharma, A. K., Kamboj, V., & Sharma, A. K. (2021). Anthropogenic influence on water quality and phytoplankton diversity of upper Ganga basin: A case study of Ganga River and its major tributaries. World Water Policy, 00, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.12049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, G., Kumar, A., Naik, P. K., Tiwari, A. K., & Berndtsson, R. (2018). Ecological analysis of nutrient dynamics and phytoplankton assemblage in the Ganga river system. Uttarakhand. Taiwan Water Conservancy, 66(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muduli, P. R., Kumar, A., Kanuri, V. V., Mishra, D. R., Acharya, P., Saha, R., Biswas, M. K., Vidyarthi, A. K., & Sudhakar, A. (2021). Water quality assessment of the Ganges River during COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18, 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03245-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negi, R. K., Joshi, P. C., & Negi, T. (2012). Seasonal variation and species composition of phytoplankton in Ganga river and its tributary at Garhwal region, Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Zoology and Research, 2(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, F. (2016). Hierarchical clustering In, Introduction to HPC with MPI for Data Science. Springer International Publishing. (pp 195–211).

  • Ockenfeld, K., & Guhr, H. (2003). Groyne fields–sink and source functions of ‘flow-reduced zones’ for water content in the River Elbe (Germany). Water Science and Technology, 48(7), 17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, T. K., Rawtani, D., & Agrawal, Y. K. (2016). Bioindicators: The natural indicator of environmental pollution. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1162753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourafrasyabi, M., & Ramezanpour, Z. (2014). Phytoplankton as bio-indicator of water quality in Sefid Rud River, Iran (South of Caspian Sea). Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, G. W. (1970). Algae of the western Great Lakes area, with an illustrated key to the genera of desmids and freshwater diatoms (4th ed.). Brown Co. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4650

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., & Eaton, A. D. (2017). Standard method for examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M., & Shamim, F. (2020). Research on the impact of industrial pollution on river Ganga: A review. International Journal of Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution, 6(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C. E., & Wiener W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communities. In The University of Illinois Press . Urbana, 23(5).

  • Sharma, R. C., Singh, N., & Chauhan, A. (2016). The influence of physico-chemical parameters on phytoplankton distribution in a head water stream of Garhwal Himalayas: A case study. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 42(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2015.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, A. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Mijic, A., Buytaert, W., Pathak, S., Garg, R. D., & Shukla, S. (2018). Population growth, land use and land cover transformations, and water quality nexus in the upper Ganga river basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(9), 4745–4770. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4745-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, N., Gupta, M. K., Chaurasia, G. L., Singh, S., Singh, S. B., Shukla, D. N., Srivastava, V., & Tandon, P. K. (2015). A study on phytoplankton diversity in river Ganga at Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh (India). Green Chemistry & Technology Letters, 1(01), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.18510/gctl.2015.1115

  • Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. In Nature (p. 688). https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

  • Singh, M., Pandey, U., & Pandey, J. (2022). Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on water quality, microbial extracellular enzyme activity, and sediment-P release in the Ganga River. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20243-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Surya, S., Landge, A. T., Deshmukhe, G., Ramteke, K. K., & Kumar, J. (2018). Fish community structure and trophic status – A measure of ecological degradation : A case study from Powai Lake Mumbai. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 44(4), 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol, M., Arjmandi, R., Shayeghi, M., Monavari, S. M., & Karbassi, A. (2017). Application of multivariate statistical methods to optimize water quality monitoring network with emphasis on the pollution caused by fish farms. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 46(1), 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwary, R. K., Rajak, G. P., & Abhishek, & Mondal, M. R. (2005). Water quality assessment of Ganga river in Bihar region, India. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 47(4), 326–335.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vajravelu, M., Martin, Y., Ayyappan, S., & Mayakrishnan, M. (2018). Seasonal influence of physico-chemical parameters on phytoplankton diversity, community structure and abundance at Parangipettai coastal waters, Bay of Bengal, South East Coast of India. Oceanologia, 60, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2017.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. B., & Whipple, G. C. (1992). Freshwater biology (W. Edmondson (ed.)). Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John.

  • Wassie, T. A., & Melese, A. W. (2017). Impact of physicochemical parameters on phytoplankton compositions and abundances in Selameko Manmade Reservoir, Debre Tabor, South Gondar, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 7, 1791–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0352-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., Schoups, G., & Van De Giesen, N. (2017). Organic pollution of rivers: Combined threats of urbanization, livestock farming and global climate change. Scientific Reports, 7, 43289. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, ICAR-CIFRI, for supporting and carrying out this study. The authors are thankful to S. K. Srivastava and Vijay Kumar for technical support and Jai Ram Prasad and Munshi Ram Rana for field support.

Funding

This study was part of the Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR) project “Impact assessment of multiple habitat alterations on ecosystem functions and fisheries in rivers”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeetendra Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors declare that they have strictly followed all the rules and principles of ethical and professional conduct while completing the research work. No specific permission was required to collect the phytoplankton samples at the study sites. The research activities were carried out following permission from the Institute Research Committee, the approving authority of the institutional research project.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that all have approved the order of authors listed in the manuscript of us.

We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process. He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, J., Alam, A., Jha, D.N. et al. Impact of barrages on assemblage pattern of phytoplankton in tropical river Ganga, India. Environ Monit Assess 194, 804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10484-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10484-z

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Jeetendra Kumar
  2. Simanku Borah