Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A quantitative and qualitative assessment of microplastics collected at two public beaches along the east and south-east coast of Mauritius

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microplastics had been collected at two sites namely Trou d’eau Douce (TD) and La Cambuse (LC) public beaches, lying in the east coast and south-east coast of Mauritius, respectively, over 6 months from September 2019 to February 2020. The sizes of the latter varied from 180 µm to 4 mm. A higher amount of microplastics collected/6-kg sand sample was recorded at LC. Two-way ANOVA revealed that (1) there was a considerable gap in the variability regarding quantity and size distribution of microplastics on the two beaches. The post-hoc analysis showed that the majority of the microplastics at LC were > 1.40 mm, whereas the smaller plastic fragments < 1.40 mm were more dominant at TD. (2) There was a significant interaction between location and event (p value = 0.025). The post-hoc analysis showed that the torrential rain hitting the island prior to sampling week 7 had decreased the microplastic counts at both TD and LC, but not significantly. Interestingly, the two hurricanes, prior to weeks 8 and 9, had appreciably reduced the microplastic counts at TD and, on the other hand, there was an increase in the amount of microplastics at LC, but not to a significant effect. The chemical nature (qualitative analysis) of microplastics was determined by density flotation and FTIR spectroscopy. Microplastics at TD were exclusively high-density polyethylene (HDPE) in origin, whereas, at LC, microplastics were both HDPE and polypropylene (PP) in origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Alexander, J., et al. (2016). Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. EFSA journal, i4(6), 4501 12-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrady, A. (2011). Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine pollution bulletin, 62(8), 1596–1605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arutchelvi, S., Arkatkar, A., Doble, M., Bhaduri, S. & Veera Uppara, P. (2008). Biodegradation of polyethylene and polypropylene. [ebook] Available at: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/7326/4/IJBT%207%281%29%209-22.pdf

  • Barboza, L., C´ozar, A., Gimenez, B., Thayanne, L., Kershaw, P., & Guilhermino, L. (2019). Chapter 17 - macroplastics pollution in the marine environment. In: World seas. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00019-X.

  • Besley, A., Vijver, M., Behrens, P., & Bosker, T. (2017). A standardized method for sampling and extraction methods for quantifying microplastics in beach sand. Marine pollution bulletin, 114(1), 77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuvaneswari, G. H. (2018). Degradability of polymers. Recycling of polyurethane foams. Plastics design library, 29–44.

  • Cedro, A. & Cleary, J. (2015). Microplastics in Irish freshwaters: A preliminary study [ebook].

  • Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine pollution bulletin, 62(12), 2588–2597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. D., Covernton, G. A., Davies, H. L., Dower, J. F., Juanes, F., & Dudas, S. E. (2019). Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental science and technology, 53(12), 7068–7074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C. M., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., et al. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: More than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • GESAMP. (2016). Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: Part two of a global assessment. In: P. J. Kershaw & C. M. Rochman (Eds.), IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 93, 220.

  • Hartline, N., Bruce, N., Karba, S., Ruff, E., Sonar, S., & Holden, P. (2016). Microfiber masses recovered from conventional machine washing of new or aged garments. Environmental science & technology, 50(21), 1532–11538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, L., Yousefi, N., & Tufenkji, N. (2017). Are there nanoplastics in your personal care products? Environmental science & technology Letters, 4(7), 280–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, R. & Ockerman, H. (2017). Guidance on concrete ways to reduce microplastics in stormwater and sewage, 2017. Available at: https://www.ccb.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ccb-guidance-on-concrete-ways-to-reduce-microplastics-in-stormwater-and-sewage.pdf

  • Katz, D. (1998). Identification of polymers, Chemist, Educator, Science Communicator, and Consultant 133 N. Desert Stream Dr. Tucson, AZ 85745.

  • Martignac, M., Ladirat, L., Wong-Wah-Chung, P., Doumenq, P., Budzin-ski, H., Perez, E. & Ter Halle, A. (2016). Persistent organic pollutants adsorbed on microplastics from the North Atlantic Gyre. Fate and impact of microplastics in marine ecosystems, 134–135.

  • Masura, J., Baker, J., Foster, G. & Arthur, C. (2015). Laboratory methods for the analysis of microplastics in the marine environment. Available at: https://marinedebris.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/publications-files/noaa_microplastics_methods_manual.pdf

  • Naidoo, T., Thompson, R. C., & Rajkaran, A. (2020). Quantification and characterisation of microplastics ingested by selected juvenile fish species associated with mangroves in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Environmental pollution, 257, 113635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nor, N. H. M., & Obbard, J. P. (2014). Microplastics in Singapore’s coastal mangrove ecosystems. Marine pollution bulletin, 79(1–2), 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online document Gray, A. (2018, June 2018). Around 90% of all river-borne plastic that ends up in the ocean comes from just 10 rivers. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/90-of-plastic-polluting-our-oceans-comes-from-just-10-rivers/

  • Online document Lee, J. and Eribake, A. (2020, August 2020). Here’s why so much World Trade Passes Mauritius. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://gcaptain.com/heres-why-so-much-world-trade-passes-mauritius/

  • Song, Y., Hong, S., Jang, M., Han, G., Jung, S., & Shim, W. (2017). Combined effects of UV exposure duration and mechanical abrasion on microplastic fragmentation by polymer type. Environmental science & technology, 51(8), 4368–4376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Halle, A., Ladirat, L., Gendre, X., Goudouneche, D., Pusineri, C., Routaboul, C., et al. (2016). Understanding the fragmentation pattern of marine plastic debris. Environmental science & technology, 50(11), 5668–5675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Moos, N., Burkhardt-Holm, P., & Köhler, A. (2012). Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environmental science & technology, 46(20), 11327–11335.

  • Wright, S., & Kelly, F. (2017). Plastic and human health: A micro issue? Environmental Science & Technology, 51(12), 6634–6647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yonkos, L., Friedel, E., Perez-Reyes, A., Ghosal, S., & Arthur, C. (2014). Microplastics in four estuarine rivers in the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. Environmental science & technology, 48(24), 14195–14202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S., Zhu, L., & Li, D. (2015). Microplastic in three urban estuaries, China. Environmental pollution, 206, 597–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to the Faculty of Science of University of Mauritius for providing the necessary funding, logistics and technical support to carry out this important research work. In particular, we are also very thankful to Mr Yadav A. Imrit and Associate Professor R. Boojhawon for helping us with the statistical analysis and to the reviewers for their precious comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishore Boodhoo.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

We consider Environmental Monitoring and Assessment to be an appropriate journal for the publication of this manuscript. We confirm that this manuscript has not been published before and is not under consideration for publication in another journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 217 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 112 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boodhoo, K., Ramessur, R.T., Namah, O. et al. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of microplastics collected at two public beaches along the east and south-east coast of Mauritius. Environ Monit Assess 194, 640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10269-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10269-4

Keywords

Navigation