Abstract
In this study, to increase the accuracy of determining the parameters of groundwater balance and finally the aquifer reservoir deficit, WA + as a new water accounting system has been applied by calculating six sheets in the Plasjan basin, central Iran. According to the results, the volume of rainfall and transfer flow to the basin was 548.8 MCM in the water year 2016–2017, which entered the hydrological cycle as input. Moreover, the results of FAO’s Water Productivity Open-Access Portal (WaPOR) product showed that evapotranspiration was equal to 465 MCM, of which 345 and 120 MCM belonged to green water and blue water, respectively, at the basin level. The results of the WaPOR product showed that 264 MCM of evapotranspiration was beneficial, while the rest was non-beneficial in the basin. Finally, investigating the runoff and utilization of water resources showed that the return flow to surface water and groundwater resources was 35.5 MCM and 62 MCM, respectively. Therefore, the aquifer deficit was estimated to be 56.3 MCM based on the results of the WA + system. By calculating the evapotranspiration using remote sensing in WA + , the return water flow was estimated at 28%, being more accurate compared to the classical groundwater balance. Consequently, the amount of aquifer deficit calculated by the WA + method was accurate according to the balance and the aquifer hydrograph. The findings of this study show that as a suitable tool, the water accounting system can reduce the uncertainty of groundwater balance calculations.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- WA + :
-
Water accounting plus
- SEEAW:
-
System for Environmental and Economic Accounting for Water
- WAPOR:
-
Water Productivity Open-Access Portal
- PLU:
-
Protected land use
- ULU:
-
Utilized land use
- MLU:
-
Modified land use
- MWU:
-
Managed water use
- ET:
-
Evapotranspiration
- MCM:
-
Million cubic meters
References
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. (2009). Water accountants: de nieuwe generatie waterbeheercontroleurs. Technische Universiteit Delft.
Bastiaanssen, W. G., Karimi, P., Rebelo, L. M., Duan, Z., Senay, G., Muthuwatte, L., & Smakhtin, V. (2014). Earth observation based assessment of the water production and water consumption of Nile Basin agro-ecosystems. Remote Sensing, 6(11), 10306–10334.
Delavar, M., Morid, S., Morid, R., Farokhnia, A., Babaeian, F., Srinivasan, R., & Karimi, P. (2020). Basin-wide water accounting based on modified SWAT model and WA+ framework for better policy making. Journal of Hydrology, p.124762.
Delavar, M., Eini, M.R., Kuchak, V.S., Zaghiyan, M.R., Shahbazi, A., Noormohammadi, F., & Motamedi, A. (2022). Model-based water accounting for integrated assessment of water resources systems at the basin scale. Science of The Total Environment, p.154810.
Droogers, P., Simons, G., Bastiaanssen, W., & Hoogeveen, J. (2010). Water Accounting Plus (WA+) in the Okavango River Basin.
Ekwueme, B. N., & Agunwamba, J. C. (2020). Modeling the influence of meorological variables on runoff in a tropical watershed. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(12), 2344–2351.
Ekwueme, B. N. & Agunwamba, J. C. (2021). Trend Analysis and Variability of Air Temperature and Rainfall in Regional River Basins. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(05).
European Union (EU). (2015). Guidance document on the applicationof water balances for supporting the implementation of the WFD (P.126). Technical Report - 2015 – 090. ISBN 978–92–79–52021–1. https://doi.org/10.2779/352735
FAO. (2012). Coping with water scarcity; an action framework for agriculture and food security, FAO water reports 38, FAO, Rome.
Gibrilla, A., Anornu, G., & Adomako, D. (2018). Trend analysis and ARIMA modelling of recent groundwater levels in the White Volta River basin of Ghana. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 6, 150–163.
Guerschman, J. P., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Mattersdorf, G., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Leuning, R., Pipunic, R. C., & Sherman, B. S. (2009). Scaling of Potential Evapotranspiration with MODIS Data Reproduces Flux Observations and Catchment Water Balance Observations across Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 369(1), 107–119.
Hellegers, P. J. G. J., Soppe, R., Perry, C. J., & Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. (2009). Combining remote sensing and economic analysis to support decisions that affect water productivity. Irrigation Science, 27(3), 243–251.
Hunink, J., Simons, G., Suárez-Almiñana, S., Solera, A., Andreu, J., Giuliani, M., Zamberletti, P., Grillakis, M., Koutroulis, A., Tsanis, I., & Schasfoort, F. (2019). A simplified water accounting procedure to assess climate change impact on water resources for agriculture across different European river basins. Water, 11(10), 1976.
Javadi, S., Saatsaz, M., Shahdany, S. M. H., Neshat, A., Milan, S. G., & Akbari, S. (2021). A new hybrid framework of site selection for groundwater recharge. Geoscience Frontiers, 12(4), 101144.
Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W.G., Molden, D., & Cheema, M. J. M. (2013). Basin-wide water accounting based on remote sensing data: An application for the Indus Basin. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 17(7).
Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Sood, A., Hoogeveen, J., Peiser, L., Bastidas-Obando, E., & Dost, R. (2014). Spatial evapotranspiration, rainfall and land use data in water accounting–Part 2: Reliability of water accounting results for policy decisions in the Awash basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 11, 1–44.
Khaleghi, N. (2016). Comparison of effective rainfall estimation methods in agriculture. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 51–58.
Ministry of Energy. (2014). Instructions for methods of calculating the balance of water resources.
Molden, D. (1997). Accounting for Water Use and Productivity, SWIM Paper 1, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Molden, D., & Sakthivadivel, R. (1999). Water accounting to assess use and productivity of water. Water Resour. Dev., 15, 55–71.
Momblanch, A., Pedro-Monzonís, M., Solera, A. and Andreu, J. (2018). Water accounting for integrated water resources management: Experiences and recommendations. In Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection, 3, 63–96 Elsevier.
Peranginangin, N., Sakthivadivel, R., Scott, N. R., Kendy, E., & Steenhuis, T. S. (2004). Water accounting for conjunctive groundwater/surface water management: Case of the Singkarak-Ombilin River basin. Indonesia. Journal of Hydrology, 292(1–4), 1–22.
Perry, C. J. (2007). Efficient irrigation; inefficient communication; flawed recommendations. Irrig. Drainage, 56, 367–378.
Prior, A. (2016). WA+ as a technical tool for transboundary water governance: The potential of satellite data for water accounting in ungauged basins (Doctoral dissertation, Master’s Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium).
Rahimpour, M., Karimi, N., Rouzbahani, R., & Eftekhari, M. (2018). Validation and calibration of FAO’s WaPOR product (actual evapotranspiration) in Iran using in-situ measurements. Iran-Water Resources Research, 14(2).
Razavi, S., Davary, K., & Davary, A. (2020). Water balance challenges in IRAN and provides a framework for improving it. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 88–93.
System at the Basin Level and the Challenges. (Lessons Learned From the Case Study of Tashk - Bakhtegan Basin). Iran-Water Resources Research, 16(2).
UN. (2007). System of Environmental Economic Accounting for Water, United Nation Statistics Division, Geneva.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2012). System of environmental-economic accounting for water. United Nations.
WASB (Water Accounting Standards Board). (2014). Water accounting conceptual framework for the preparation and presentation of general purpose water accounting reports.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: S. M. Hashemy Shahedany, S. Javadi; data collection: Z. Rahimzadeh, N.Karimi; analysis and interpretation of results: Z. Rahimzadeh, S. M. Hashemy Shahedany; draft manuscript preparation: Z. Rahimzadeh, S. Javadi, H. Kardan. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kivi, Z.R., Javadi, S., Karimi, N. et al. Performance evaluation and verification of groundwater balance using WA + as a new water accounting system. Environ Monit Assess 194, 580 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10193-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10193-7