Abstract
The supply capacity of ecosystem services (ES) in the past decades has shown a significant decrease globally, while ES demand capacity has increased. Identifying the spatial mismatch of ES supply and demand (ES S&D) can provide valuable knowledge about where the gaps are. Existing studies, however, lack specifics about the spatial mismatch of ES S&D—that is, few studies consider the coupling and decoupling relationship of ES S&D at the national scale. This study tries to fill the gap by examining the spatiotemporal distribution of ES S&D capacity in China from 2000 through 2020 using the land use/land cover matrix method. The spatial mismatch between ES S&D was ultimately identified by using coupling and decoupling analysis models. A continuous increase was found in the ES demand capacity in China during the period studied, while a continuous decline was found in the ES supply capacity. The coupling degree of the ES S&D was relatively higher in the plains areas. The strong negative decoupling was the dominant relationship between ES S&D, which was widely distributed in eastern and southeastern China. The spatial mismatch of ES S&D in China has increased substantially from 2000 through 2020. The findings in this study provide important implications for ES management and effective allocation of resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alberti, M., Asbjornsen, H., Baker, L. A., Brozovic, N., Drinkwater, L. E., Drzyzga, S. A., Jantz, C. A., Fragoso, J., Holland, D. S., Kohler, T. T. A., Liu, J. J., McConnell, W. J., Maschner, H. D. G., Millington, J. D. A., Monticino, M., Podestáá, G., Pontius, R. G., Redman, C. L., Reo, N. J., … Urquhart, G. (2011). Research on coupled human and natural systems (CHANS): Approach, challenges, and strategies. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 92, 218–228.
Baró, F., Palomo, I., Zulian, G., Vizcaino, P., Haase, D., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016). Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 57, 405–417.
Blumstein, M., & Thompson, J. R. (2015). Land-use impacts on the quantity and configuration of ecosystem service provisioning in Massachusetts. USA. J. Appl. Ecol., 52, 1009–1019.
Bryan, B. A., Gao, L., Ye, Y., Sun, X., Connor, J. D., Crossman, N. D., Stafford-Smith, M., Wu, J., He, C., Yu, D., Liu, Z., Li, A., Huang, Q., Ren, H., Deng, X., Zheng, H., Niu, J., Han, G., & Hou, X. (2018). China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 559, 193–204.
Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., & Müller, F. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape online, 34, 1-32.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., & Windhorst, W. (2009). Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape online, 15, 1-22.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29.
Chen, B., Yang, Q., Li, J. S., & Chen, G. Q. (2017). Decoupling analysis on energy consumption, embodied GHG emissions and economic growth—The case study of Macao. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 67, 662–672.
Chen, J., Jiang, B., Bai, Y., Xu, X., & Alatalo, J. M. (2019a). Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 1426–1439.
Chen, W. X., Chi, G., & Li, J. (2019b). The spatial association of ecosystem services with land use and land cover change at the county level in China, 1995–2015. Science of the Total Environment, 669, 459–470.
Chen, W., & Chi, G. (2022). Urbanization and ecosystem services: The multi-scale spatial spillover effects and spatial variations. Land Use Policy, 114, 105964.
Chen, W., Chi, G., & Li, J. (2020). The spatial aspect of ecosystem services balance and its determinants. Land Use Policy, 90, 104263.
Chen, W. X., Chi, G., & Li, J. (2020b). Ecosystem services and their driving forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 17, 3717.
Chi, G. Q., & Ho, H. C. (2018). Population stress: A spatiotemporal analysis of population change and land development at the county level in the Continental United States, 2000–2010. Land Use Policy, 70(1), 128–137.
Chi, G., & Zhu, J. (2019). Spatial regression models for the social sciences. SAGE publications.
Cord, A. F., Bartkowski, B., Beckmann, M., Dittrich, A., Hermans-Neumann, K., Kaim, A., Lienhoop, N., Locher-Krause, K., Priess, J., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Schwarz, N., Seppelt, R., Strauch, M., Václavík, T., & Volk, M. (2017). Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services, 28, 264–272.
Costanza, R., & DArge, R., DeGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., ONeill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., VandenBelt, M.,. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
de Bruyn, S. M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1997). Developments in the throughput-income relationship: Theoretical and empirical observations. Ecological Economics, 20, 255–268.
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.
Egarter Vigl, L., Depellegrin, D., Pereira, P., de Groot, R., & Tappeiner, U. (2017). Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 422–436.
Enevoldsen, M. K., Ryelund, A. V., & Andersen, M. S. (2007). Decoupling of industrial energy consumption and CO2-emissions in energy-intensive industries in Scandinavia. Energy Econ., 29, 665–692.
Feurer, M., Rueff, H., Celio, E., Heinimann, A., Blaser, J., Htun, A. M., & Zaehringer, J. G. (2021). Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in Southern Myanmar. Ecosystem services, 52, 101363.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653.
Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206.
Geijzendorffer, I. R., Martín-López, B., & Roche, P. K. (2015). Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecological Indicators, 52, 320–331.
Goldstein, J. H., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T. K., Ennaanay, D., Hannahs, N., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S., Wolny, S., & Daily, G. C. (2012). Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 7565–7570.
González-García, A., Palomo, I., González, J. A., López, C. A., & Montes, C. (2020). Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning. Land Use Policy, 94, 104493.
Guan, Q., Hao, J., Xu, Y., Ren, G., & Kang, L. (2019). Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services. Resour. Sci., 41(7), 1359–1373.
Guan, Q., Hao, J., Ren, G., Li, M., Chen, A., Duan, W., & Chen, H. (2020). Ecological indexes for the analysis of the spatial–temporal characteristics of ecosystem service supply and demand: A case study of the major grain-producing regions in Quzhou, China. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105748.
Jiang, M., Jiang, C., Huang, W., Chen, W., Gong, Q., Yang, J., ... & Yang, Z. (2022). Quantifying the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services and identifying its spatial determinants: A case study of ecosystem restoration hotspot in Southwest China. Ecological Engineering, 174, 106472.
Kapsar, K., Hovis, C., Bicudo Da Silva, R., Buchholtz, E., Carlson, A., Dou, Y., Du, Y., Furumo, P., Li, Y., Torres, A., Yang, D., Wan, H., Zaehringer, J., & Liu, J. (2019). Telecoupling research: The first five years. Sustainability, 11, 1033.
Kehoe, P., & Rhodes, S. (2013). Pushing the conservation envelope through the use of alternate water sources. Journal American Water Works Association, 105, 46–50.
Li, G., Fang, C., & Wang, S. (2016). Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China. Science of the Total Environment, 545–546, 609–620.
Li, W., Wang, Y., Xie, S., & Cheng, X. (2021). Coupling coordination analysis and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between urbanization and ecosystem health in Chongqing municipality, China. Science of The Total Environment, 791, 148311.
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., Martinelli, L. A., McConnell, W. J., Moran, E. F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K. R., Reenberg, A., Rocha, G. D. M., Simmons, C. S., … Zhu, C. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18, 26.
Liu, J., Kuang, W., Zhang, Z., Xu, X., Qin, Y., Ning, J., Zhou, W., Zhang, S., Li, R., Yan, C., Wu, S., Shi, X., Jiang, N., Yu, D., Pan, X., & Chi, W. (2014). Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24, 195–210.
Liu, J., Liu, M., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z., & Deng, X. (2003). Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Sci. China Ser. D, 46, 373–384.
Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, X., Kuang, W., Zhou, W., Zhang, S., Li, R., Yan, C., Yu, D., Wu, S., & Jiang, N. (2010). Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 483–494.
Ning, J., Liu, J., Kuang, W., Xu, X., Zhang, S., Yan, C., Li, R., Wu, S., Hu, Y., Du, G., Chi, W., Pan, T., & Ning, J. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28, 547–562.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). OECD Environmental Strategy for the First Decade of the 21st Century: Adopted by OECD Environmental Ministers. OECD.
Palacios-Agundez, I., Onaindia, M., Barraqueta, P., & Madariaga, I. (2015). Provisioning ecosystem servicES S&D: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 47, 145–155.
Pan, Z., & Wang, J. (2021). Spatially heterogeneity response of ecosystem services supply and demand to urbanization in China. Ecological Engineering, 169, 106303.
Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2015). Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosystem Services, 13, 108–118.
Peng, J., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Xu, Z., Zhao, M., ... & Wu, J. (2020). Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis. Ecosystem Services, 44, 101139.
SC, (State Council). (2010). Notice of the State Council on issuing the National Major Functional Zoning Plan. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-08/20/content_10107.
Schröter, M., Koellner, T., Alkemade, R., Arnhold, S., Bagstad, K. J., Erb, K., Frank, K., Kastner, T., Kissinger, M., Liu, J., López-Hoffman, L., Maes, J., Marques, A., Martín-López, B., Meyer, C., Schulp, C. J. E., Thober, J., Wolff, S., & Bonn, A. (2018). Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosystem Services, 31, 231–241.
Schirpke, U., Candiago, S., Egarter Vigl, L., & J¨ ager, H., Labadini, A., Marsoner, T., Meisch, C., Tasser, E., Tappeiner, U.,. (2019). Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 928–941.
Serna-Chavez, H. M., Schulp, C. J. E., van Bodegom, P. M., Bouten, W., Verburg, P. H., & Davidson, M. D. (2014). A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 39, 24–33.
Shi, Y., Shi, D., Zhou, L., & Fang, R. (2020). Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106418.
Song, W., & Deng, X. (2017). Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Science of the Total Environment, 576, 705–719.
Sun, X., Tang, H., Yang, P., Hu, G., Liu, Z., & Wu, J. (2020). Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 703, 135005.
Sun, Y., Liu, S., Dong, Y., An, Y., Shi, F., Dong, S., & Liu, G. (2019a). Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China. Science of the Total Environment, 681, 211–225.
Sun, W., Li, D., Wang, X., Li, R., Li, K., & Xie, Y. (2019b). Exploring the scale effects, trade-offs and driving forces of the mismatch of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 103, 617–629.
Tao, Y., Wang, H., Ou, W., & Guo, J. (2018). A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem servicES S&D dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region. Land Use Policy, 72, 250–258.
Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12, 137–151.
Vergara, X., Carmona, A., & Nahuelhual, L. (2021). Spatial coupling and decoupling between ecosystem services provisioning and benefiting areas: Implications for marine spatial planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 203, 105455.
Vialatte, A., Barnaud, C., Blanco, J., Ouin, A., Choisis, J. P., Andrieu, E., ... & Sirami, C. (2019). A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1653-1673.
Von Weizsacker, E., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1997). Factor four-doubling wealth, halving resource use. Earthscan.
Wang, J., Zhai, T., Lin, Y., Kong, X., & He, T. (2019). Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 781–791.
Wei, H., Liu, H., Xu, Z., Ren, J., Lu, N., Fan, W., Zhang, P., & Dong, X. (2018). Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang. China. Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 44–57.
Wolff, S., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159–171.
Wu, X., Liu, S., Zhao, S., Hou, X., Xu, J., Dong, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Quantification and driving force analysis of ecosystem services supply, demand and balance in China. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 1375–1386.
Xin, R., Skov-Petersen, H., Zeng, J., Zhou, J., Li, K., Hu, J., ... & Wang, Q. (2021). Identifying key areas of imbalanced supply and demand of ecosystem services at the urban agglomeration scale: A case study of the Fujian Delta in China. Science of The Total Environment, 791, 148173.
Xu, Q., Yang, R., Zhuang, D., & Lu, Z. (2021). Spatial gradient differences of ecosystem services supply and demand in the Pearl River Delta region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123849.
Xu, Z., Peng, J., Dong, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Q., Lyu, D., ... & Zhang, Z. (2022). Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand: An ecological zoning approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104258.
Zhai, T., Wang, J., Jin, Z., Qi, Y., Fang, Y., & Liu, J. (2020). Did improvements of ecosystem services supply-demand imbalance change environmental spatial injustices?. Ecological Indicators, 111, 106068.
Zhang, Z. (2000). Decoupling China’s carbon emissions increase from economic growth: An economic analysis and policy implications. World Development, 28(4), 739-752.
Zhang, G., Zheng, D., Xie, L., Zhang, X., Wu, H., & Li, S. (2021). Mapping changes in the value of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Megalopolis, China. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101252.
Funding
The research is sponsored in part by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42001187). The project was also supported by the State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology of China (2021-KF-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WC: conceptualization, methodology, software, writing (original draft), formal analysis; WC: conceptualization, methodology; GC: conceptualization, writing (review and editing).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This is an observational study. The Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
The participant has consented to the submission of this case report to the journal.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, W., Chi, G. Spatial mismatch of ecosystem service demands and supplies in China, 2000–2020. Environ Monit Assess 194, 295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09981-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09981-y