Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting household solid waste generation and management in Sri Lanka: an empirical study

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effect of “waste management” factors (Knowledge, Motivation, Time, Awareness, Contribution, Attitudes) on household waste generation (HWG), more precisely the measured weight of waste generated at households for a week (MWWGHW) while controlling for the socioeconomic factors such as family size, monthly family income, education level, and occupation. It also examines the moderating effects of the geographic location (urban versus rural areas) on the relationships between waste management factors and MWWGHW while controlling for the aforementioned socioeconomic factors. The overall results show that socioeconomic factors such as Family Size (\(\beta\) = 0.134; p < 0.001) and Monthly Family Income (\(\beta\) = 0.301; p < 0.001) significantly and positively influence MWWGHW, whereas the Occupation factor (\(\beta\) = − 0.106, p < 0.05) significantly and negatively influences MWWGHW. Furthermore, the results show that the Knowledge (\(\beta\) = − 0.129, p < 0.05), Motivation (\(\beta\) = − 0.161, p < 0.001), Contribution (\(\beta\) = − 0.111, p < 0.05), and Awareness (\(\beta\)= − 0.189, p < 0.001) factors significantly and negatively influence MWWGHW. While the results show that the geographic location Urban Area moderates significantly the relationship between the Motivation factor and MWWGHW (\(\beta\) = − 0.129, p < 0.05), the same results show, however, that the geographic location Rural Area moderates significantly but negatively the relationships between Knowledge factor and MWWGHW (\(\beta\) = − 0.187, p < 0.01); Motivation factor and MWWGHW (\(\beta\) = − 0.390, p < 0.001); Contribution factor and MWWGHW (\(\beta\) = − 0.154, p < 0.10); and Awareness factor and MWWGHW (\(\beta\) = − 0.285, p < 0.001). Based on these results, implications for policy orientations and future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (CM) upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adzawla, W., Tahidu, A., Mustapha, S., & Azumah, S. B. (2019). Do socioeconomic factors influence households’ solid waste disposal systems? Evidence from Ghana. Waste Management & Research, 37(1_suppl), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x18817717

  • Afroz, R., Hanaki, K., & Tudin, R. (2011a). Factors affecting waste generation: A study in a waste management program in Dhaka City. Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 179(1–4), 509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afroz, R., Tudin, R., Hanaki, K., & Masud, M. M. (2011b). Selected socio-economic factors affecting the willingness to minimise solid waste in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(6), 711–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhassan, H., Kwakwa, P. A., & Owusu-Sekyere, E. (2020). Households’ source separation behaviour and solid waste disposal options in Ghana’s Millennium City. Journal of Environmental Management, 259, 110055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110055

  • Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1–4). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411

  • Astane, A. R. D., & Hajilo, M. (2017). Factors affecting the rural domestic waste generation Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 3(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2017.03.04.007

  • Babaei, A. A., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Teymouri, P., Ahmadi, K., & Rafiee, M. (2015). Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.014

  • Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandara, N. J., Hettiaratchi, J. P. A., Wirasinghe, S., & Pilapiiya, S. (2007). Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: A case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1), 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Structural equation models: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog, 2(3), 139–168

  • Buenrostro, O., Bocco, G., & Cram, S. (2001). Classification of sources of municipal solid wastes in developing countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 32(1), 29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Springer

  • Dangi, M. B., Pretz, C. R., Urynowicz, M. A., Gerow, K. G., & Reddy, J. (2011). Municipal solid waste generation in Kathmandu. Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(1), 240–249

    Google Scholar 

  • De Feo, G., & De Gisi, S. (2010). Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: A sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge. Waste Management, 30(6), 958–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 119–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedy, M., & Mittal, R. (2013). Willingness of residents to participate in e-waste recycling in India. Environmental Development, 6, 48–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekere, W., Mugisha, J., & Drake, L. (2009). Factors influencing waste separation and utilization among households in the Lake Victoria crescent, Uganda. Waste Management, 29(12), 3047–3051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.001

  • Field, A (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Introducing Statistical Methods Series. Sage Publications, London

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökdere, M. (2005). A study on environmental knowledge level of primary students in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching

  • Gooderham, P., Minbaeva, D. B., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Governance mechanisms for the promotion of social capital for knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis New Jersy: Pearson Education. Pearson Education

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Education, Inc.

  • Hoyt, W. T., Warbasse, R. E., & Chu, E. Y. (2006). Construct validation in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 769–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwan, D., Basri, N. E. A., Watanabe, K., & Abushammala, M. F. M. (2013). Influence of income level and age on per capita household solid waste generation in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(2)

  • Padilla, J. A., & Trujillo, J. C. (2018). Waste disposal and households’ heterogeneity. Identifying factors shaping attitudes towards source-separated recycling in Bogotá, Colombia. Waste Management, 74, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.052

  • Jadoon, A., Batool, S. A., & Chaudhry, M. N. (2014). Assessment of factors affecting household solid waste generation and its composition in Gulberg Town, Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 16(1), 73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jereme, I. A., Siwar, C., Begum, R. A., & Talib, B. A. (2016). Addressing the problems of food waste generation in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(8), 68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. The World Bank

  • Khan, D., Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2016). 2016/03/01/). Impact of socioeconomic status on municipal solid waste generation rate. Waste Management, 49, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F., Ahmed, W., & Najmi, A. (2019). Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.020

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2005. New York, NY: Guilford, 2

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed ed.)

  • Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2017). An empirical model for prediction of household solid waste generation rate – A case study of Dhanbad, India. Waste Management, 68, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.034

  • Kumara, A. S., & Pallegedara, A. (2020). Household waste disposal mechanisms in Sri Lanka: Nation-wide survey evidence for their trends and determinants. Waste Management, 114, 62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, D., & Nardiya, S. (2013). A cost evaluation method for transferring municipalities to solid waste source-separated system. Waste Management, 33(5), 1064–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskey, B., & Singh, M. (2017). Household waste generating factors and composition study for effective management in Gorkha municipality of Nepal. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n6p169

  • Mattar, L., Abiad, M. G., Chalak, A., Diab, M., & Hassan, H. (2018, 2018/10/10/). Attitudes and behaviors shaping household food waste generation: Lessons from Lebanon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1219–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.085

  • Meneses, G. D., & Palacio, A. B. (2005). Recycling behavior: A multidimensional approach. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 837–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda-Benítez, S., Armijo-de Vega, C., & Marquez-Montenegro, M. Y. (2008). Household solid waste characterization by family socioeconomic profile as unit of analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(7), 992–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoh, F. P., Yan, X., & Conteh, A. M. H. (2012). A situational assessment of socioeconomic factors affecting solid waste generation and composition in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2012

  • Saphores, J.-D. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2006). Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: An application to California. Environment and behavior, 38(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505279045

  • Sorkun, M. F. (2018). How do social norms influence recycling behavior in a collectivistic society? A case study from Turkey. Waste Management, 80, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.026

  • Srun, P., & Kurisu, K. (2019). Internal and external influential factors on waste disposal behavior in public open spaces in Phnom Penh. Cambodia. Sustainability, 11(6), 1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B.E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujauddin, M., Huda, S., & Hoque, A. R. (2008). Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong. Bangladesh. Waste Management, 28(9), 1688–1695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). SAS for windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanh, N. P., Matsui, Y., & Fujiwara, T. (2010, Nov). Household solid waste generation and characteristic in a Mekong Delta city, Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2307–2321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.016

  • Tinsley, H. E., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trang, P. T. T., Dong, H. Q., Toan, D. Q., Hanh, N. T. X., & Thu, N. T. (2017). The effects of socio-economic factors on household solid waste generation and composition: A case study in Thu Dau Mot. Vietnam. Energy Procedia, 107, 253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zen, I. S., Noor, Z. Z., & Yusuf, R. O. (2014). The profiles of household solid waste recyclers and non-recyclers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 42, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.010

  • Zhang, H., Duan, H., Andric, J. M., Song, M., & Yang, B. (2018). Characterization of household food waste and strategies for its reduction: A Shenzhen City case study. Waste Management, 78, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

    Yuhuan Zhao, Hemantha Premakumara Diunugala & Claudel Mombeuil

  2. Rezo Inovasyon Edikatif Ayisyen, Mirebalais, Haiti

    Claudel Mombeuil

Authors
  1. Yuhuan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hemantha Premakumara Diunugala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudel Mombeuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudel Mombeuil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Diunugala, H.P. & Mombeuil, C. Factors affecting household solid waste generation and management in Sri Lanka: an empirical study. Environ Monit Assess 193, 838 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09633-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09633-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation