Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental monitoring and impact assessment of Prut River cross-border pollution

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cross-border rivers management is a challenge for the involved countries, especially if they do not have the same type of legislation. The negative effects on water quality are quantified by using environmental impact assessment tools. Thus, the quantification of impacts that could affect the human health, ecosystem equilibrium, and biodiversity is based on monitoring of the water quality indicators. An increased attention should be paid to the toxic pollutants resulted from various activities that may affect the aquatic environment and human health on short and long term. This study approaches the cross-border impact assessment of heavy metals, organic, and nutrient pollution in the case of two countries (Romania and Republic of Moldova), the Prut River being the natural border. The methodology considered a specific area of the Prut River on both river sides, based on specific water quality indicators. The studied area covers sampling points from North to South within Iasi County and Republic of Moldova, in the Prut River cross-border section. To assess the pollutants’ impacts, the improved Leopold Matrix and the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix were adapted and applied. The results offered an overview on water pollution level and impacts on the Prut River cross-border area, for the 5-year period (2015–2019). There is a major negative impact generated in the Southern part of the studied area, in the case of the following indicators: copper, selenium, organic substances, with an increased level of pollution recorded in the last 2 years (2018, 2019). The conclusion of this research is that even if both countries follow the international protocols concerning cross-border pollution, they still have to comply to different environmental standards which approach differently the pollution levels and the significant impacts on water quality.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Al-Nasrawi, F. A., Kareem, S. L., & Saleh, L. A. (2020). Using the Leopold Matrix Procedure to Assess the Environmental Impact of Pollution from Drinking Water Projects in Karbala City, Iraq. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 671(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012078

  • Ashofteh, P. S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2017). Multi-criteria environmental impact assessment of alternative irrigation networks with an adopted matrix-based method. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1554-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjoveanu, G., Cojocariu, C., Robu, B., & Teodosiu, C. (2010). Integrated assessment of wastewater treatment plants for sustainable river basin management. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 9(9), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2010.162

  • Brescancin, F., Dobšinská, Z., De Meo, I., Šálka, J., & Paletto, A. (2018). Analysis of stakeholders’ involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castanho, R. A. (2019). Identifying processes of smart planning, governance and management in European border cities. Learning from City-to-City cooperation (C2C). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195476

  • Duca, G., Mereuta, A., Velisco, N., Tanaselia, C., & Mitina, T. (2019). Determination of quality indicators of Prut River water. Chemistry Journal of Moldova. https://doi.org/10.19261/cjm.2018.541

  • European Commission Directive (2009). Directive no. 2009/90/EC of 31 July 2009 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status.

  • European Parliament Directive, European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2013). Directives of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy.

  • GD, Governmental Decision no. 570/2016, (2016). Decision on normative by which regulates at national level the values of the maximum allowable concentration (CMA) for the priority / priority hazardous substances in surface waters, published in Romanian Official Monitor, part I.

  • Gilbuena, R., Kawamura, A., Medina, R., Amaguchi, H., Nakagawa, N., & Bui, D. D. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of structural flood mitigation measures by a rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) technique: A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines. Science of the Total Environment, 456–457, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GO (2001) Government ordinance no 105 of 17th of July 2001 on the State Border of Romania.

  • GO, Government RM (2011) Law No. 215 as of 04.11.2011 on the State Border of the Republic of Moldova.

  • GO, Governmental Order Ministry of Environmental and Water Management (2006). Norms on surface water quality classification in order to establish the ecological status of water bodies, Order no. 161 of 16 February 2006, Ministry of Environmental and Water Management.

  • Guerreiro, J., Chircop, A., Grilo, C., Viras, A., Ribeiro, R., & van der Elst, R. (2010). Establishing a transboundary network of marine protected areas: Diplomatic and management options for the east African context. Marine Policy, 34(5), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzipanayotou, P., Lahiri, S., & Michael, M. S. (2005). Reforms of environmental policies in the presence of cross-border pollution and public-private clean-up. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00410.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijäs, A., Kuitunen, M. T., & Jalava, K. (2010). Developing the RIAM method (rapid impact assessment matrix) in the context of impact significance assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiricka-Pürrer, A., Bösch, M., & Pröbstl-Haider, U. 2018 Desired but neglected: Investigating the consideration of alternatives in Austrian EIA and SEA practice Sustain, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103680

  • Jitar, O., Teodosiu, C., Oros, A., Plavan, G., & Nicoara, M. (2015). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in marine organisms from the Romanian sector of the Black Sea. New Biotechnology, 32(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.11.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Josimovic, B., Petric, J., & Milijic, S. (2014). The Use of the Leopold Matrix in Carrying Out the EIA for Wind Farms in Serbia. Energy and Environment Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/eer.v4n1p43

  • Kuitunen, M., Jalava, K., & Hirvonen, K. (2008). Testing the usability of the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method for comparison of EIA and SEA results. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(4–5), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2018). The risk assessment of river water pollution based on a modified non-linear model. Water (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozba-Stirbuleac, R. S., Giurma-Handley, C. R., & Giurma, I. (2011). Water quality characterization of the Prut River. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2011.060

  • Mirauda, D., & Ostoich, M. (2011). Surface water vulnerability assessment applying the integrity model as a decision support system for quality improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrica, B., Dumitrascu, M., Kucsicsa, G., & Dogaru, D., (2016). Crossing the bordes. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region. Resources Pilot Centre for cross-border preservation of the aquatic biodiversity of Prut River. Central European Service for Cross-Border initiatives, Budapest, Terez.

  • Mohebali, S., Maghsoudy, S., Doulati Ardejani, F., & Shafaei, F. (2019). Developing a coupled environmental impact assessment (C-EIA) method with sustainable development approach for environmental analysis in coal industries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00513-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MondalRashmi, & Dasgupta, B. V. , M. K. (2010). EIA of municipal solid waste disposal site in Varanasi using RIAM analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(9), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoara, M., Zubcov, E., Bagrin, N., Borodin, N., Strungaru, S. A., Jurminscaia, O., & Plavan, G. (2015). Evaluation of environmental impact and risk in Prut River using five indicators (CBO5, CCO-Cr, SO42-, NO2-, NO3-). Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18331/sfs2015.1.2.1

  • Ouédraogo, O., & Amyot, M. (2013). Mercury, arsenic and selenium concentrations in water and fish from sub-Saharan semi-arid freshwater reservoirs (Burkina Faso). Science of the Total Environment, 444, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palma, P., Köck-Schulmeyer, M., Alvarenga, P., Ledo, L., Barbosa, I. R., López de Alda, M., & Barceló, D. (2014). Risk assessment of pesticides detected in surface water of the Alqueva reservoir (Guadiana basin, southern of Portugal). Science of the Total Environment, 488–489(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, N., Habib, H., Venkatappa, M., Ebbers, T., Duboz, R., & Shipin, O. (2015). Framework tool for a rapid cumulative effects assessment: case of a prominent wetland in Myanmar. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4508-4

  • PRBMP (2000). Romanian Environmental Ministery: Romanian Environmental Ministry: Updated Management Plan of the Prut Barlad Hydrographic Space. 2000. http://www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx. Accessed 21 March 2019.

  • PRBMP (2015) Academy of Sciences of Moldova: River Basins: Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, 2021. http://blacksea-riverbasins.net/sites/default/files/Moldova_Plan_Prut_draft.pdf. Accessed 5 December 2019

  • Protected areas of Romania. http://ananp.gov.ro/ariile-naturale-protejate-ale-romaniei/. Accessed 15 Mar 2020.

  • Robu, B. M. (2012). Environmental Assessments- Applications (in Romanian). Ecozone Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robu, B. M., Jitar, O., Teodosiu, C., Strungaru, S.A., Nicoara, M.N., & Plavan, G. (2015). Environmental impact and risk assessment of the main pollution sources from the Romanian black sea coast. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2015.033

  • Rocha, C. F., Ramos, T. B., & Fonseca, A. (2019). Manufacturing pre-decisions: A comparative analysis of environmental impact statement (EIS) reviews in Brazil and Portugal. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11123235

  • Sajjadi, S. A., Aliakbari, Z., Matlabi, M., Biglari, H., & Rasouli, S. S. (2017). Environmental impact assessment of Gonabad municipal waste landfill site using Leopold Matrix. Electronic Physician. https://doi.org/10.19082/3714

  • Sankaran, R., Show, P. L., Ooi, C. W., Ling, T. C., Shu-Jen, C., Chen, S. Y., & Chang, Y. K. (2020). Feasibility assessment of removal of heavy metals and soluble microbial products from aqueous solutions using eggshell wastes. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01792-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakib-Manesh, T. E., Hirvonen, K. O., Jalava, K. J., Ålander, T., & Kuitunen, M. T. (2014). Ranking of small scale proposals for water system repair using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 49, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluser, B. M., Şchiopu, A. M., Balan, C., & Pruteanu, M. (2017). Postclosure influence of emissions resulted from municipal waste dump sites: A case study of the north-east region of Romania. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 16(4), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.103

  • Stefanescu, L., Robu, B. M., & Ozunu, A. (2013). Integrated approach of environmental impact and risk assessment of Rosia Montana Mining Area Romania. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(11), 7719–7727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1528-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strungaru, S. A., Nicoara, M., Teodosiu, C., Baltag, E., Ciobanu, C., & Plavan, G. (2018). Patterns of toxic metals bioaccumulation in a cross-border freshwater reservoir. Chemosphere, 207, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suditu, G. D., & Robu, B. M. (2012). Digitization of the environmental impact quantification process. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 11, 841–848. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.107

  • Teodosiu, C., Barjoveanu, G., Robu, B., & Ene, S. A. (2012). Sustainability in the water use cycle: Challenges in the romanian context. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.248

  • Teodosiu, C., Robu, B., Cojocariu, C., & Barjoveanu, G. (2015). Environmental impact and risk quantification based on selected water quality indicators. Natural Hazards, 75, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0637-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodosiu, C., Barjoveanu, G., Sluser, B. R., Popa, S. A. E., & Trofin, O. (2016). Environmental assessment of municipal wastewater discharges: A comparative study of evaluation methods. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1029-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodosiu, C., Gilca, A. F., Barjoveanu, G., & Fiore, S. (2018). Emerging pollutants removal through advanced drinking water treatment: A review on processes and environmental performances assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1210–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE. Towards sustainable renewable energy investment and deployment - Trade-offs and opportunities with water resources and the environment, Geneva, 2020. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/publications/ENERGY_127/Towards_sustainable_renewable_energy_investment_and_deployment_small_web_.pdf

  • Vandana, M., John, S. E., Maya, K., Sunny, S., & Padmalal, D. (2020). Environmental impact assessment (EIA) of hard rock quarrying in a tropical river basin—study from the SW India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08485-x

  • Yegemova, S., Kumar, R., Abuduwaili, J., Ma, L., Samat, A., Issanova, G., Ge, Y., Kumar, V., Keshavarzi, A., & Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2018). Identifying the key information and land management plans for water conservation under dry weather conditions in the border areas of the Syr Darya River in Kazakhstan. Water (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., Xiu, C., Zhao, C., & Ding, Z. (2018). Strategic cross-border water pollution in Songliao Basin. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124713

  • Zaharia, L., Ioana-Toroimac, G., Moroşanu, G. A., Gălie, A. C., Moldoveanu, M., Čanjevac, I., Belleudy, P., Plantak, M., Buzjak, N., Bočić, N., Legout, C., Bigot, S., & Ciobotaru, N. (2018). Review of national methodologies for rivers’ hydromorphological assessment: A comparative approach in France, Romania, and Croatia. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleňáková, M., Labant, S., Zvijáková, L., Weiss, E., Čepelová, H., Weiss, R., Fialová, J., & Minďaš, J. (2020). Methodology for environmental assessment of proposed activity using risk analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 80, 106333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number 26PCCDI/01.03.2018, “Integrated and sustainable processes for environmental clean-up, wastewater reuse and waste valorisation” (SUSTENVPRO), within PNCDI III.

Funding

This research was funded by Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number 26PCCDI/01.03.2018, “Integrated and sustainable processes for environmental clean-up, wastewater reuse and waste valorisation” (SUSTENVPRO), within PNCDI III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, “Cristofor Simionescu” Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 73 Prof. Dr. D. Mangeron Street, 700050, Iași, Romania

    Roxana Neamtu, Brindusa Sluser, Oana Plavan & Carmen Teodosiu

Authors
  1. Roxana Neamtu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brindusa Sluser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oana Plavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carmen Teodosiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

For this research articles, the authors contributed as follows: conceptualization and methodology—C.T. and B.S.; investigation—R.N.; data acquisition and analysis—R.N., O.P.; resources and data curation—O.P., R.N.; writing—original draft preparation—R.N., O.P., B.S.; writing—review and editing—O.P., B.S., C.T.; project coordination—C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Brindusa Sluser or Carmen Teodosiu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neamtu, R., Sluser, B., Plavan, O. et al. Environmental monitoring and impact assessment of Prut River cross-border pollution. Environ Monit Assess 193, 340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09110-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09110-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation