Abstract
The Amazonian biome is important not only for South America but also for the entire planet, providing essential environmental services. The state of Rondônia ranks third in deforestation rates in the Brazilian Legal Amazon (BLA) political division. This study aims to evaluate the land use/land cover (LULC) changes over the past ten years (2009–2019), as well as, to predict the LULC in the next 10 years, using TerrSet 18.3 software, in the state of Rondônia, Brazil. The machine learning algorithms within the Google Earth Engine cloud-based platform employed a Random Forest classifier in image classifications. The Markov-CA deep learning algorithm predicted future LULC changes by comparing scenarios of one and three transitions. The results showed a reduction in forested areas of about 15.7% between 2009 and 2019 in the Rondônia state. According to the predictive model, by 2030, around 30% of the remaining forests will be logged, most likely converted into occupied areas. The results reinforce the importance of measures and policies integrated with investments in research and satellite monitoring to reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon and ensure the continuity of the Amazonian role in halting climate change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Abdelkareem, O. E. A., Elamin, H. M. A., Eltahir, M. E. S., Adam, H. E., Elhaja, M. E., Rahamtalla, A. M., Babatunde, O., & Elmar, C. (2017). Accuracy assessment of land use land cover in Umabdalla Natural Reserved Forest, South Kordofan, Sudan. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 5–9. http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/ijaes
Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R., & Caldas, M. (2011). Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010
Barona, E., Ramankutty, N., Hyman, G., & Coomes, O. T. (2010). The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 5, 024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002
Carvalho, R., Aguiar, A. P., & Amaral, S. (2020). Diversity of cattle raising systems and its effects over forest regrowth in a core region of cattle production in the Brazilian Amazon. Regional Environmental Change, 20, 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01626-5
Carvalho, T. S., & Domingues, E. P. (2016). Projeção de um cenário econômico e de desmatamento para a Amazônia Legal brasileira entre 2006 e 2030. Nova Economia, 26(2), 585–621. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/2665
Cavalcante, F. R. C. (2011). Análise da desigualdade regional no estado de Rondônia à luz da teoria institucionalista de Douglass North. Tese (Doctoral thesis, Belém, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil).
Congalton, R. (1991). A review of assessment the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
Costa, F. D. A. (2004). Path dependency e a transformação agrária do bioma amazônico: o sentido econômico das capoeiras para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Novos Cadernos NAEA, 7, 111–158. https://doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v7i2.44
Costa, F. D. A. (2009). Dinâmica agrária e balanço de carbono na Amazônia. Revista Economia, 10, 117–151. https://anpec.org.br/revista/vol10/vol10n1p117_151.pdf
Costa, O. B., Matricardi, E. A., Pedlowski, M. A., Cochrane, M. A., & Fernandes, L. C. (2017). Spatiotemporal mapping of soybean plantations in Rondônia, Western Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amazônica, 47(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201601544
D’antonna, A. O., Vanwey, L. K., & Hayashi, C. M. (2006). Property size and land cover change in the Brazilian amazon. Population and Environment, 27(5–6), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-006-0031-4
D’Almeida, C., Vörösmarty, C. J., Hurtt, G. C., Marengo, J. A., Dingman, S. L., & Keim, B. D. (2007). The effects of deforestation on the hydrological cycle in Amazonia: A review on scale and resolution. International Journal of Climatology, 27(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1475
de Bem, P. P., Carvalho Junior, O. A., Guimarães, R., & Gomes, R. A. (2020). Change detection of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon using Landsat data and convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 12(6), 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060901
Dias-Filho, M. B. (2011). Degradação de pastagens: processos, causas e estratégias de recuperação. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/1070416/1/TC1117CartilhaPastagemV04.pdf
Dias-Filho, M. B. (2015). Estratégias de recuperação de pastagens degradadas na Amazônia brasileira. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1019156
Escada, M. I. S., Vieira, I. C. G., Kampel, S. A., Araújo, R., Veiga, J. B., Aguiar, A. P. D., Veiga, I., Oliveira, M., Gavina, J. L. P., Carneiro-Filho, A., Fearnside, P. M., Venturieri, A., Carriello, F., Thales, M., Carneiro, T. S. G., Monteiro, A. M. V., & Câmara, G. (2005). Processos de ocupação nas novas fronteiras da Amazônia: o interflúvio do Xingu/Iriri. Estudos Avançados, 19, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142005000200002
Fadli, A. H., Kosugo, A., Ichii, K., & Ramll, R. (2019). Satellite-based monitoring of forest cover change in Indonesia using Google Earth Engine from 2000 to 2016. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012046
Fearnside, P. (2017). Business as usual: A resurgence of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Yale Environment 360. https://e360.yale.edu/features/business-as-usual-a-resurgence-of-deforestation-in-the-brazilian-amazon
Ferraz, S. F. B., Vettorazzi, C. A., & Theobald, D. M. (2009). Using indicators of deforestation and land-use dynamics to support conservation strategies: A case study of central Rondônia, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(7), 1586–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.013
Foody, G. M. (2020). Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111630
Gash, J. H. C., & Nobre, C. A. (1997). Climatic effects of Amazonian deforestation: Some results from ABRACOS. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(5), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3c0823:CEOADS%3e2.0.CO;2
Guan, D., Li, H., Inohae, T., Su, W., Nagaie, T., & Hokao, K. (2011). Modelling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecological Modelling, 222, 3761–3772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.009
Gupta, R., & Sharma, L. K. (2020). Efficacy of Spatial Land Change Modeler as a forecasting indicator for anthropogenic change dynamics over five decades: A case study of Shoolpaneshwar Wildlife Sanctuary, Gujarat, India. Ecological Indicators, 112, 10617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106171
Hamad, R., Balzter, H., & Kolo, K. (2018). Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios. Sustainability, 10, 3421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103421
Jusys, T. (2016). Quantitative spatial analysis of deforestation in Legal Amazon: Selected topics (Doctoral thesis, Balearic Islands, University of the Balearic Islands, Balearic Islands, Spain). http://hdl.handle.net/11201/148774
Kamusoko, C., Aniya, M., Adi, B., & Manjoro, M. (2009). Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe e simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model. Applied Geography, 29, 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.002
Khanna, J., & Medvigy, D. (2014). Strong control of surface roughness variations on the simulated dry season regional atmospheric response to contemporary deforestation in Rondônia, Brazil. Journal of Geophysical Research, 119, 13067–13078. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022278
Lapola, D. M., Schaldach, R., Alcamo, J., Boundeau, A., Koch, J., Koelking, C., & Priess, J. A. (2010). Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 3388–3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
Marchand, S. (2012). The relationship between technical efficiency in agriculture and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 77, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.025
May, P., Barbosa, A., Azeredo, E., Costa, F., Ramos, F., Speranza, J. & Lanza, T. (2019). Políticas de crédito podem incentivar boas práticas na Amazônia Legal. AgroANALYSIS, 39(9), 25–26. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/agroanalysis/article/viewFile/80249/76688
Mmbaga, N. E., Munishi, L. K., & Treydte, A. C. (2017). How dynamics and drivers of land use/land cover change impact elephant conservation and agricultural livelihood development in Rombo, Tanzania. Journal of Land Use Science, 12(2–3), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2017.1313324
Montibeller, B., Kmoch, A., Virro, H., Mander, U., & Uuemaa, E. (2020). Increasing fragmentation of forest cover in Brazil’s Legal Amazon from 2001 to 2017. Scientific Reports, 10, 5803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62591-x
Morton, D. C., Defries, R. S., & Shimabukuro, Y. E. (2006). Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 14637–14641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606377103
Murad, C. A., & Pearse, J. (2018). Landsat study of deforestation in the Amazon region of Colombia: Departments of Caquetá and Putumayo. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 11, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.07.003
Neves, A. K., Körting, T. S., Fonseca, L. M. G., & Escada, M. I. S. (2020). Assessment of TerraClass and MapBiomas data on legend and map agreement for the Brazilian Amazon biome. Acta Amazonica, 50(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201900981
Nkomeje, F. (2017). Comparative performance of multi-source reference data to assess the accuracy of classified remotely sensed imagery: Example of Landsat 8 OLI Across Kigali City-Rwanda 2015. International Journal of Engineering Works, 4 (1), 10–20. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01455461
Noma, A., Korting, T. S., & Fonseca, L. M. G. (2013). Uma comparação entre classificadores usando regiões e perfis EVI para agricultura. [Paper presentation]. XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto (SBSR), Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280741200_Uma_Comparacao_entre_Classificadores_usando_Regioes_e_Perfis_EVI_para_Agricultura
Oliveira, J.P. (2017). Detecção de áreas desmatadas na porção sul do estado das amazonas, utilizando técnicas de extração de características e redes neurais artificiais (Doctoral thesis, Manaus, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil). http://tede.ufam.edu.br/handle/tede/5791
Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302004
Piontekowski, V. J., Ribeiro, F. P., Matricardi, E. A. T., Lustosa Junior, I. V., Bussinguer, A. P., & Gatto, A. (2019). Modeling deforestation in the state of Rondônia. Floresta e Ambiente, 26(3), e20180441. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.044118
Prakasam, C. (2010). Land use and land cover change detection through remote sensing approach: A case study of Kodaikanal Taluk, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 1(2):150–158. http://ipublishing.co.in/jggsvol1no12
INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (n.d.). Deforestation estimates in the Brazilian Amazon. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/
Reydon, B.P., Fernandes, V.B. & Telles, T.S. (2019). Land governance as a precondition for decreasing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104313
Richards, J. A. (1994). Remote sensing digital image analysis: An introduction. . Springer-Verlag.
Rivero, S., Almeida, O., Ávila, S., & Oliveira, W. (2009). Pecuária e desmatamento: uma análise das principais causas diretas do desmatamento na Amazônia. Revista Nova Economia, 19(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-63512009000100003
Rodriguez, D. A., Tomasella, J., & Linhares, C. (2010). Is the forest conversion to pasture affecting the hydrological response of Amazonian catchments? Signals in the Ji-Paraná basin, Hydrological Processes, 24(10), 1254–1269. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7586
Sasikala, B. S., Biju, V. G., & Prashanth, C. M. (2017). Kappa and accuracy evaluations of machine learning classifiers. [Paper presentation] 2nd IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information & Communication Technology, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT.2017.8256551
Scarrow, R. (2019). Amazon battles: Frontiers and deforestation. Nature Plants, 5(2), 124–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0371-6
Souza, C. M., Jr. Shimbo, Z., J., Rosa, M. R., Parente, L. L., A. Alencar, A., Rudorff, B. F. T., Hasenack, H., et al. (2020). Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
Souza, C., Jr. Siqueira, J., Sales, M., Fonseca, A., Ribeiro, J., Numata, I., Cochrane, M., et al. (2013). Ten-year Landsat classification of deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sensing, 5(11), 5493–5513. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5115493
Stepchenko, A., & Chizhov, J. (2015). Applying markov chains for NDVI time series forecasting of Latvian regions. Information Technology and Management Science, 18(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1515/itms-2015-0009
Story, M., & Congalton, R. (1986). Accuracy assessment: A user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52(3), 397–399.
Subedi, P., Subedi, K., & Thapa, B. (2013). Application of a hybrid cellular automaton—Markov (CA-Markov) model in land-use change prediction: A case study of Saddle Creek drainage basin. Florida. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 1(6), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-1-6-5
Theobald, D. M., & Hobbs, N. T. (1998). Forecasting rural land-use change: A comparison of regression and spatial transition based models. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 2, 65–82.
Wu, Y. & Sills, E. (2018). The evolving relationship between market access and deforestation on the Amazon frontier. [Paper presentation]. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C, United States of America.
Yang, X., Zheng, X., & Chen, R. (2014). A land use change model: Integrating landscape pattern indexes and Markov-CA. Ecological Modelling, 283, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Isabela Xavier Floreano and Luzia Alice Ferreira de Moraes. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Isabela Xavier Floreano, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Floreano, I.X., de Moraes, L.A.F. Land use/land cover (LULC) analysis (2009–2019) with Google Earth Engine and 2030 prediction using Markov-CA in the Rondônia State, Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 193, 239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09016-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09016-y