Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new ecosystem-based land classification of Iran for conservation goals

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land management and biodiversity protection are highly dependent on ecosystem classification. To identify the ecosystems, often ecologically homogenous areas are distinguished based on physical and biological features at various scales. These areas can also be considered as biodiversity surrogates for protection policies and planning. We classified the terrestrial areas of Iran into ecosystems using revised and updated layers of landform and climate as our two main criteria. Moreover, we applied a revised vegetation layer as the confirmatory criterion. At a scale of 1:1,000,000, we obtained a total of 119 homogenous ecological units, and based on the dominant vegetation types, we classified them into 21 terrestrial ecosystems at the national level. Of these ecosystems, 11 were dominated by vegetation, and the remaining 10 had sparse nondominant vegetation. Evaluation of the least and most frequent ecosystem patches and ranking of their size classes using landscape metrics provided an information basis for better land protection planning. We maintain that each ecosystem needs to be represented by a protected area and its size and distribution also helps us form a comprehensive and effective protection network in Iran.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardakani, M. R. (2003). Ecology. Tehran: University of Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. (1980). Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, miscellaneous publication no. 1391. United States Department of Agriculture, (1391), 77 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

  • Bailey, R. G. (1996). Ecosystem geography. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. (2005). Identifying ecoregion boundaries. Environmental Management, 34(1 SUPPL), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0163-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, G. (2004). Integrating biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: Lessons learned from ecological networks. IUCN.

  • Benson, J. S. (2006). New South Wales vegetation classification and assessment: Introduction — The classification, database, assessment of protected areas and threat status of plant communities. Science and Public Programs Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust AUSTRALIA. Cunninghamia, 9(3), 331–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, C., & Frondoni, R. (2011). Modern perspectives for plant sociology: the case of ecological land classification and the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosystems, 145(SUPPL. 1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.602747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, C., Capotorti, G., Copiz, R., Guida, D., Mollo, B., Smiraglia, D., & Zavattero, L. (2014). Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosystems, 3504(May 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.985756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, C., Capotorti, G., Alós Ortí, M. M., Anzellotti, I., Attorre, F., Azzella, M. M., Carli, E., Copiz, R., Garif, V., Manes, F., Marando, F., Marchetti, M., Mollo, B., & Zavattero, L. (2017). Ecosystem mapping for the implementation of the European biodiversity strategy at the national level: the case of Italy. Environmental Science and Policy, 78(June), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, C., Capotorti, G., Copiz, R., & Mollo, B. (2018). A first revision of the Italian ecoregion map. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 3504, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1492996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canu, S., Rosati, L., Fiori, M., Motroni, A., Filigheddu, R., & Farris, E. (2015). Bioclimate map of Sardinia (Italy). Journal of Maps, 11(5), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.988187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capotorti, G., Guida, D., Siervo, V., Smiraglia, D., & Blasi, C. (2012). Ecological classification of land and conservation of biodiversity at the national level: the case of Italy. Biological Conservation, 147(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, M. L., Acosta, A. T. R., Stanisci, A., Pirone, G., & Ciaschetti, G. (2008). Ecosystem classification for EU habitat distribution assessment in sandy coastal environments: an application in Central Italy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140(1–3), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9851-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2002). Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5701.

  • Djamali, M., Akhani, H., & Khoshravesh, R. (2011). Application of the global bioclimatic classification to Iran: implications for understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecologia Mediterranea, 37(1), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, D. H. K., & Benn, G. A. (2000). Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(4), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00068-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisk, C. (2014). Examination and classification of ecosystem vegetation and ecosystem services in Messinia, Greece. Stockholm. Retrieved from http://www.biodivcanada.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=137E1147-1.

  • Galicia-Herbada, D., González, J. H., Torres, R. M., Pinilla, J. S., & Martín, R. H. (2011). An environmental land classification of Spain. Fitosociologia, 48(2), 101–110.

  • Ganji, M. (2003). Climatic divisions of Iran. Scientific Bulletin Of Climatological Research Institute, 3(1), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani, K., BazrafshanDaryasary, M., MeftahHalaghi, M., & Ghahreman, N. (2016). The effects of climate change on DeMartone climatic classification in Golestan province. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Reserarch, 47(2), 319–332 Retrieved from https://ijswr.ut.ac.ir/article_58337.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • GhorbanizadehKharazi, H., & ChelemalDezfulnejad, M. (2014). Innovation of a new climate classification method based on hydrometeorology. Quarterly Journal of Water Engineering, 2(2), 97–108 Retrieved from http://jwe.iau-shoushtar.ac.ir/article_529621_en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbertson, A. J. (1905). The major natural regions : an essay in systematic geography. The Geographical Journal, 25(3), 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge, L. R. (1967). Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, 206. Via https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00329.x.

  • Jafari, A. (2012). History of natural geography of Iran. Tehran: Gitashenasi Geographical & Cartographic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javanshir, K. (1976). Atlas of woody plants of Iran. Tehran: National Society of Natural Resources and Human Environment Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, S. (2006). From single species to ecosystem-based management: prospects for effective biodiversity conservation. In: Biodiversity: Science and Governance. UNESCO, (June), 1–4. Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/31533.

  • Kusbach, A. (2010). Terrestrial ecosystem classification in the Rocky Mountains, northern Utah, 213. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1675&context=etd.

  • Leathwick, J. R., Overton, J. M., & McLeod, M. (2003). An environmental domain classification of New Zealand and its use as a tool for biodiversity management; Una Clasificación Ambiental de Nueva Zelanda y Su Utilización Como una Herramienta para el Manejo de Biodiversidad. Conservation Biology, 17(6), 1612–1623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00469.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, T. R., & Merchant, J. M. (2004). Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: Geographical and ecological perspectives. Environmental Management, 34(Suppl 1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-5181-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjnoonian, H. (1995). Biosphere reserves. Tehran: Department of the Environment of Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieus, P., Fiorina, C., Santos, F., Paracchini, M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J. (2013). Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: an analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2779/12398.

  • Martínez-Tilleria, K., Núñez-Ávila, M., León, C. A., Pliscoff, P., Squeo, F. A., & Armesto, J. J. (2017). A framework for the classification Chilean terrestrial ecosystems as a tool for achieving global conservation targets. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12), 2857–2876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1393-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minaee, M. (2002). An introduction to political geography of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffarian, V. (1996). A dictionary of Iranian plant names. Tehran: Farhang Mo’ser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafikani, A. (2002). An introduction to the physical geography of Iran. Tehran: National Geographical Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neishabouri, A. (2013). Biogeography. Tehran: Samt Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, I., Holmes, A., Dangerfield, J. M., Gillings, M., Anthony, J., Britton, D. R., Holley, M., Montgomery, M. E., Raison, M., Logan, V., Pressey, R. L., & Beattie, A. J. (2004). Land systems as surrogates for biodiversity in conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 14(2), 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'Amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lammoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., & Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. (2004). Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environmental Management, 34, S27–S38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-5197-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2002). The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R. L., Hager, T. C., Ryan, K. M., Schwarz, J., Wall, S., Ferrier, S., & Creaser, P. M. (2000). Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation, 96(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00050-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, J., Ebrahimpour, M., & Khalili, A. (2013). Spatial changes of extended De Martonne climatic zones affected by climate change in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 112(3–4), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0741-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnemai, M. T. (2014). IRAN:The spatial and natural potentials. Tehran: Mahkameh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, R., Austin, M., & Rice, J. (2010). Ecological classification system for the ecosystem status and trends report. Canadian Biodiversity: Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010, Technical Thematic Report No. 1, (1), ii+14. Retrieved from http://www.biodivcanada.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=137E1147-1.

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2015). Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4990-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. (2015). National project of recognition of Iran ecological regions. Tehran: Agricultural Research Education And Extention Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, E. W., Segan, D. B., & Watson, J. E. M. (2015). Global status of and prospects for protection of terrestrial geophysical diversity. Conservation Biology, 29(3), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, R., Comer, P., Warner, H., & Cress, J. (2009). A new map of standardized terrestrial ecosystems of the conterminous United States: US geological survey professional paper 1768, 17.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, R., Dangermond, J., Frye, C., Vaughan, R., Aniello, P., Breyer, S., Cribbs, D., Hopkins, D., Nauman, R., Derrenbacher, W., Wright, D., Brown, C., Convis, C., Smith, J., Benson, L., Paco VanSistine, D., Warner, H., Cress, J., Danielson, J., Hamann, S., Cecere, T., & Reddy, P. (2014). A new map of global ecological land units — an ecophysiographic stratification approach (p. 46). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858199.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singers, N. J. D., & Rogers, G. M. (2014). A classification of New Zealand ’ s terrestrial ecosystems. Science for Conservation, 325, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2018). Ecological Land Classification, 2017. Minister of industry. Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/subjects/standard/environment/elc/12-607-x2018001-eng.pdf.

  • Terauds, A., Chown, S. L., Morgan, F., Peat, H. J., Watts, D. J., Keys, H., Convey, P., & Bergstrom, D. M. (2012). Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic. Diversity and Distributions, 18(7), 726–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udvardy. (1975). Udvardy - A classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the world.

  • Vakilinezhad, R., MofidiShemirani, S. M., & MehdizadehSeraj, F. (2018). New method for climatic classification of Iran based on natural ventilation potential (case study: Yazd). Journal of Climate Research, 8(32), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H., & Box, E. (1976). Global classification of natural terrestrial ecosystems author ( s ): Heinrich Walter and Elgene Box published by : Springer stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/20036922. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditi, 32(2), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R., & Kelly, C. K. (2004). Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusefi, G. H., Safi, K., & Barito, J. C. (2019). Network- and distance-based methods in bioregionalization processes at regional scale: An application to the terrestrial mammals of Iran. Journal of Biogeography, 46(11), 2433–2443.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our greatest thanks and gratitude goes to Mr. Mashhadi Rafiee (responsible for GIS section of Sazeh Pardazi Iran Consulting Engineers Company) for providing data and professional contribution in preparing the maps and Dr. Eftekhari (researcher at the Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands), Dr. Shirvani (faculty member of forestry engineering department, University of Tehran), and Dr. Tavili (faculty member of Restoration of Arid and Mountainous Regions Department, University of Tehran) for their professional contribution in classifying vegetation. Also, Mr. Bayani (general manager of engineering and studies office, Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization of Iran) and Dr. Fahmi (deputy of general manager for the Bureau of Water and Wastewater Master Planning of Iran’s Ministry of Energy) shared their valuable data with us.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamran Shayesteh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 4984 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azizi Jalilian, M., Shayesteh, K., Danehkar, A. et al. A new ecosystem-based land classification of Iran for conservation goals. Environ Monit Assess 192, 182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8145-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8145-1

Keywords

Navigation