Abstract
The selection of an appropriate sampling frequency is very important in monitoring coastal seawater quality. The present study sought to optimize the sampling frequency for coastal seawater quality monitoring. We combined mathematical models with natural and human activities by the analytic hierarchy process method. The study was designed to consider historical monitoring data, regulated seawater quality standard, tide, land use, and ship activities in optimizing coastal seawater sampling frequency in Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. The study results indicated that monitoring activities should focus in points having high human activities as well as high concentration of TSS, ammonium, and oil. Points S1–S8 should have high sampling frequency (16–30 samples/year), whereas points S23–S28 can have low sampling frequency (3–5 samples/year). In a year, monitoring activities should be focused in June, July, and August with the number of samples of 42, 54, and 44 pear year (weighting values 0.120, 0.161, and 0.112), respectively. It should consider the mathematical aspects associated with natural and human factors when calculating sampling frequency for coastal seawater quality monitoring. Proposed optimization method can be applied for other coastal regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardjmand, M., & Daneshfar, M. A. (2019). Selecting a suitable model for collecting, transferring, and recycling drilling wastes produced in the operational areas of the Iranian offshore oil company (IOOC) using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Environmental Management, 109791, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109791.
Aşchilean, I., Badea, G., Giurca, I., Naghiu, G. S., & Iloaie, F. G. (2017). Choosing the optimal technology to rehabilitate the pipes in water distribution systems using the AHP method. Energy Procedia, 112, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1109.
Chappell, N. A., Jones, T. D., & Tych, W. (2017). Sampling frequency for water quality variables in streams: Systems analysis to quantify minimum monitoring rates. Water Research, 123, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.047.
Do, H. T., Lo, S.-L., & Phan Thi, L. A. (2013). Calculating of river water quality sampling frequency by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(1), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2600-6.
Donre, Q. N. (2013-2017). Current environmental quality in Halong City (Q. N. P. P. s. C. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Trans.). Vietnam: Quang Ninh.
Gdoura, K., Anane, M., & Jellali, S. (2015). Geospatial and AHP-multicriteria analyses to locate and rank suitable sites for groundwater recharge with reclaimed water. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.003.
Huynh, S. (2002). Hydrodynamic Study of Ha Long Bay. Australia: University of Western Australia.
Kerr, J. G., Zettel, J. P., McClain, C. N., & Kruk, M. K. (2018). Monitoring heavy metal concentrations in turbid rivers: Can fixed frequency sampling regimes accurately determine criteria exceedance frequencies, distribution statistics and temporal trends? Ecological Indicators, 93, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.028.
Khashei-Siuki, A., Keshavarz, A., & Sharifan, H. (2019). Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer, Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100328.
Kovács, J., Korponai, J., Székely Kovács, I., & Hatvani, I. G. (2012). Introducing sampling frequency estimation using variograms in water research with the example of nutrient loads in the Kis-Balaton Water Protection System (W Hungary). Ecological Engineering, 42, 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.02.004.
Loftis, J. C., & Ward, R. C. (1980). Cost-effective selection of sampling frequencies for regulatory water quality monitoring. Environment International, 3(4), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(80)90141-5.
Lu, Y., Xu, H., Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017). Evaluation of water environmental carrying capacity of city in Huaihe River Basin based on the AHP method: A case in Huai'an City. Water Resources and Industry, 18, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2017.10.001.
Müskens, P. J. W. M. (1978). The use of autocorrelation techniques for selecting optimal sampling frequency: Application to surveillance of surface water quality. Analytica Chimica Acta, 103(4), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83108-1.
Naddeo, V., Scannapieco, D., Zarra, T., & Belgiorno, V. (2013). River water quality assessment: Implementation of non-parametric tests for sampling frequency optimization. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.013.
Naddeo, V., Zarra, T., & Belgiorno, V. (2007). Optimization of sampling frequency for river water quality assessment according to Italian implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.003.
Piniewski, M., Marcinkowski, P., Koskiaho, J., & Tattari, S. (2019). The effect of sampling frequency and strategy on water quality modelling driven by high-frequency monitoring data in a boreal catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 579, 124186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124186.
Rajasekhar, M., Sudarsana Raju, G., Sreenivasulu, Y., & Siddi Raju, R. (2019). Delineation of groundwater potential zones in semi-arid region of Jilledubanderu river basin, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India using fuzzy logic, AHP and integrated fuzzy-AHP approaches. HydroResearch, 2, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2019.11.006.
Ren, C., Li, Z., & Zhang, H. (2019). Integrated multi-objective stochastic fuzzy programming and AHP method for agricultural water and land optimization allocation under multiple uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.348.
Sanders, T. G., Ward, R. C., Loftis, J. C., Steele, T. D., Adrian, D. D., & Yevjevich, V. (Eds.). (1983). Design of networks for monitoring water quality: Water Resouces Publications.
Shabbir, R., & Ahmad, S. S. (2016). Water resource vulnerability assessment in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of King Saud University - Science, 28(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2015.09.007.
UNESCO. (1992). Convention concerning the protection of world culture and natural heritage - world heritage list (p. 260). Vietnam: Nomination form of Ha Long.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
Wang, G., Qin, L., Li, G., & Chen, L. (2009). Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2414–2421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.008.
Zyoud, S. H., Kaufmann, L. G., Shaheen, H., Samhan, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016). A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 61, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.016.
Funding
This research is funded by the VNU University of Science under project number TN.19.18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 289 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Do, H.T., Phan Thi, L.A. Optimization of sampling frequency for coastal seawater quality monitoring. Environ Monit Assess 192, 731 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08700-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08700-9