Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detecting the development stages of natural forests in northern Iran with different algorithms and high-resolution data from GeoEye-1

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, taking advantage of multispectral sensors with the high spatial and spectral resolution and using a variety of plant indices and remote sensing have provided the possibility of more accurate analysis and classification of satellite data in the identification of natural phenomena. Nowadays, obtaining information about the structure of forests through remote sensing data to manage renewable resources is of interest to managers and researchers. This study produced the development maps of natural forests in northern Iran by taking advantage of GeoEye-1 data, training samples, and various algorithms through the pixel-based, object-based, and model-based methods. The classification’s ultimate accuracy was calculated by each of the above methods with the overall accuracy parameters and kappa coefficient. By examining the accuracy of map classification resulting from different methods, the maximum accuracy (78%) in object-based method was estimated based on the segmentation of NDVI and the maximum likelihood algorithm. Meanwhile, some other classification methods showed much less accuracy. The results showed that the algorithms following the structural patterns for pixel distribution classification provided a higher accuracy. Also, these results showed the high potential of high-resolution data from GeoEye-1 in the production of forest development maps and the effect of choosing the appropriate algorithm in the production of higher accuracy maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahnejad, A., Panagiotidis, D., & Surov, P. (2017). Forest canopy density assessment using different approaches–Review. Journal of Forest Science, 63(3), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhavan, R., Sagheb-Talebi, K., Zenner, E. K., & Safavimanesh, F. (2012). Spatial patterns in different forest development stages of an intact old-growth oriental beech forest in the Caspian region of Iran. European Journal of Forest Research, 131(5), 1355–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Doski, J., Mansorl, S. B., & Shafri, H. Z. M. (2013). Image classification in remote sensing. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra, Malaysia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 3(10), 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, N. (2013). Evaluation of different change detection techniques in forestry for improvement of spatial objects extraction algorithms by very high resolution remote sensing digital imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-1/W3, 2013 SMPR 2013, 5–8 October 2013, Tehran, Iran, 43-47.

  • Baatz, M., & Schäpe, A. (2000). Multi resolution segmentation: an optimum approach for high quality multi scale image segmentation. In Beutrage zum AGIT-Symposium. Salzburg, Heidelberg, 12-23.

  • Baumann, M., Ozdogan, M., Wolter, P. T., Krylov, A., Vladimirova, N., & Radeloff, V. C. (2014). Landsat remote sensing of forest windfall disturbance. Remote sensing of environment, 143, 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 65(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, S., Günlü, A., & Keleş, S. (2019). Estimation of forest development stage and crown closure using different classification methods and satellite images: a case study from Turkey. Journal of Forest Science, 65(1), 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing (5th ed.p. 717). The Guilford press.

  • Chen, G., & Meentemeyer, R. K. (2016). Remote sensing of forest damage by diseases and insects. Remote Sensing for Sustainability (pp. 145–162). Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Hay, G. J., Carvalho, L. M., & Wulder, M. A. (2012). Object-based change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(14), 4434–4457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. G., & Green, K. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices, Boca Raton: Lewis Publications. Second Edition (Mapping Science) 2nd Edition.183 pp.

  • Darvishsefat, A. A., Rafieyan, O., Babaii, S., & Mataji, A. (2011). Object-based classification using UltraCam-D images for forest tree identification (case study: Hyrcanian forest of Iran). In 34th International symposium on remote sensing of Environment. The GEOSS era: towards operational environmental monitoring. Sydney 10-15.

  • Desclée, B., Bogaert, P., & Defourny, P. (2006). Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102(1-2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GeoEye’s Satellite and Aerial Imagery for Sustainable Development (2007). Presented at the United Nations/Morocco/ESA International Workshop on the Use of Space Technology for Sustainable Development, 25-27 April, 2007, Rabat. 51.

  • GEOMATICA I, Training Guide (2018). Course guide. Published by PCI Geomatics Enterprises, Inc., Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3, CANADA, 132 pp. https://www.pcigeomatics.com/pdf/TrainingGuide-Geomatica-1.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  • GEOMATICA II, Training Guide (2018). Course guide. Published by PCI Geomatics Enterprises, Inc., Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3, CANADA, 168. https://www.pcigeomatics.com/pdf/TrainingGuide-Geomatica-2.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  • GEOMATICA Performing object-based image analysis (2018). Using object analyst in Geomatica focus. Published by PCI Geomatics Enterprises, Inc., Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3, CANADA, 70 pp. https://www.pcigeomatics.com/pdf/geomatica/techspecs/Geomatica-Object-Analyst-Guide.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  • Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhonnerie, R., Siregar, V. P., Nababan, B., Prasetyo, L. B., & Wouthuyzen, S. (2015). Random forest classification for mangrove land cover mapping using Landsat 5 TM and ALOS PALSAR imageries. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 24, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Y. J., & Tanr’e, D. (1992). Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(2), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu, T., Colkesen, I., & Yomralioglu, T. (2015). Object-based classification with rotation forest ensemble learning algorithm using very-high-resolution WorldView-2 image. Remote Sensing Letters, 6(11), 834–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazempour, L. M., Taheri, A. K., Hassan, P., David, P., & Beitollah, A. (2018). Spatial patterns of trees from different development stages in mixed temperate forest in the Hyrcanian region of Iran. Journal of Forest Science, 64(6), 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademi, A., Fatemi Talab, S. R., Madanipour Kermanshahi, M., & Kord, B. (2013). Determining correlation between sequential stages and edaphic condition in the managed and unmanaged of Fagetum orientalis L. Forests in Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(3), 434–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpel, S. (1995). Die Urwald der Westkarpaten (p. 310). Stuttgart: Gustav ficher velg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Wu, C. (2014). A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: the role of spatio-contextual information. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47(1), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E. J., & D’Annunzio, R. (2016). Assessing global forest land-use change by object-based image analysis. Remote Sensing, 8(8), 678 17 pp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International journal of Remote sensing, 28(5), 823–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataji, A., Sagheb-Talebi, K., & Eshaghi-Rad, J. (2014). Deadwood assessment in different developmental stages of beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in Caspian forest ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(5), 1215–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, A. S., Martin, M., Lee, M., & Solomon, J. E. (1987). Image processing software for imaging spectrometry analysis. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 24(1), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollaeia, Y. T., Karamshahib, A., & Erfanifard, S. Y. (2019). Inventory of single oak trees using object-based method on WorldView-2 satellite images and Earth. Journal of Radar and Optical Remote Sensing JRORS, 1(2019), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, R. M. (2012). Using remotely sensed imagery for forest resource assessment and inventory. Forest ecosystems–more than just trees, 165.

  • Motlagh, M. G., Kafaky, S. B., Mataji, A., & Akhavan, R. (2018). Estimating and mapping forest biomass using regression models and Spot-6 images (case study: Hyrcanian forests of north of Iran). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 190(6), 352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourian, N., Joibary, S. S., & Mohammadi, J. (2016). Assessment of different remote sensing data for forest structural attributes estimation in the Hyrcanian forests. Forest systems, 25(3), 9 12pp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osio, A., Lefèvre, S., Ogao, P., & Ayugi, S. (2018). OBIA-based monitoring of riparian vegetation applied to the identification of degraded Acacia xanthophloea along Lake Nakuru, Kenya. Espace pour le développement (ESPACE DEV); Société T.E.T.I.S,.GEOBIA 2018–Montpellier, 18-22 June 2018. https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01960341. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

  • Pearson, R. L. (1972). Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of the shortgrass prairie. In Eighth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, (pp. 1357-1381). University of Michigan. Published May 12, 2009 by CRC Press. 376 Pages - 195 B/W Illustrations

  • Rafieyan, O., Darvishsefat, A. A., Babaii, S., & Mataji, A. (2011). Object-based classification of UltraCamD imagery for identification of tree species in the mixed planted forest. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 9(1), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. A. (2013). Remote sensing digital image analysis. An introduction. 5th Edition. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-30061-5. 464. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2.

  • Rouse, Jr. J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D.W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium. I: NASA, Washington, D.C,1974, 309-317. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740022614. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  • Shataee, S., Kellenberger, T., & Darvishsefat, A. A. (2004). Forest types classification using ETM+ data in the north of Iran/comparison of object-oriented with pixel-based classification techniques. In Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXth ISPRS Congress (pp. 12-23).

  • Shataee, S., Kalbi, S., Fallah, A., & Pelz, D. (2012). Forest attribute imputation using machine-learning methods and ASTER data: comparison of k-NN, SVR and random forest regression algorithms. International journal of remote sensing, 33(19), 6254–6280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghi Mollaei, Y., Karamshahi, A., & Erfanifard, S. Y. (2018). Evaluation of object-based and decision tree classification methods in estimating the quantitative characteristics of single oak trees on WorldView-2 and UAV images. Ecopersia, 6(4), 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tso, B., & Mather, P. M. (2009). Classification methods for remotely sensed data. Chapter 2-3. 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis Pub., America. ISBN 9781420090727

  • Valbuena, R., Maltamo, M., & Packalen, P. (2016a). Classification of forest development stages from national low-density Lidar datasets: a comparison of machine learning methods. Revista de Teledetección, 45, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valbuena, R., Maltamo, M., & Packalen, P. (2016b). Classification of multilayered forest development classes from low-density national airborne Lidar datasets. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89(4), 392–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. Journal of Sensors, 17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691.

  • Yang, J., Jones, T., Caspersen, J., & He, Y. (2015). Object-based canopy gap segmentation and classification: quantifying the pros and cons of integrating optical and LiDAR data. Remote Sensing, 7(12), 15917–15932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Zeng, Z., & Piao, S. (2015). MODIS based estimation of forest aboveground biomass in China. PloS one, 10(6), 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, Z., Yu, L., Li, Z., Ren, L., Gao, B., Wang, L., & Luo, Y. (2020). Combining GF-2 and Sentinel-2 images to detect tree mortality caused by red turpentine beetle during the early outbreak stage in North China. Forests, 11, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Amin Mahdavi Saeidi, Sasan Babaie Kafaky & Asadollah Mataji

Authors
  1. Amin Mahdavi Saeidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sasan Babaie Kafaky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asadollah Mataji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sasan Babaie Kafaky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahdavi Saeidi, A., Babaie Kafaky, S. & Mataji, A. Detecting the development stages of natural forests in northern Iran with different algorithms and high-resolution data from GeoEye-1. Environ Monit Assess 192, 653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08612-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08612-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation