Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using GIS-based multicriteria decision support system for planning road networks with visual quality constraints: a case study of protected areas in Ankara, Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protected areas are important zones due to their natural and cultural assets and their biodiversity preservation functions. Ecotourism activities in these areas have gained great importance for visitors in recent decades. Road networks established in protected areas have ecotourism-related functions, such as providing visitors with continuous access to/within these areas and offering visual richness to visitors while cruising on the roads. Road network planning that prioritizes visual quality is one of the scientific issues discussed today regarding the sustainable management of protected areas. This study focuses on planning new road networks that prioritize visual quality in protected areas and determining the optimum route that maximizes the visual quality experience of visitors. The study area was selected from the protected areas between the Kızılcahamam and Çamlıdere Districts of Ankara, Turkey, and their surroundings. In the model application, a road network was planned using the multicriteria decision support system (MDSS) method by considering visual quality parameters. In this stage, the road network that prioritized visual quality during spring and autumn seasons was investigated. Hence, weighted linear combination (WLC) was used as a geographic information system (GIS)-based MDSS method. Then, the GIS-based network analysis method was used to determine the optimum route that provided access to the scenic viewpoints (existing and proposed viewpoints) in the study area and maximized the visual quality during both seasons. In the new road network planned by considering the visual quality parameters, the total road length was calculated as 121.21 km for the spring and 129.47 km for the autumn. The lengths of the optimum routes that allowed visitors to reach the scenic viewpoints and ensured the maximum visual quality were 30.91 km and 30.70 km on the new road network for the spring and autumn seasons, respectively. This study introduced a new methodology that utilized GIS-based decision support systems to plan a road network that prioritized visual quality and determined the optimum route with the maximum visual quality. It is anticipated that this methodology can be used for sustainable management and effective planning of protected areas to reach and protect resources with high visual quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi, E., Majnounian, B., Darvishsefat, A., Mashayekhi, Z., & Sessions, J. (2009). A GIS-MCE based model for forest road planning. Journal of Forest Science, 55(4), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar, H., Dursun, E., Gulci, S., & Gumus, S. (2017). Assessment of road network planning by using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for conversion of coppice forest to high forest. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26, 2380–2388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akay, A. E., Erdas, O., & Karas, I. R. (2006). Using GIS and optimization techniques in selecting forest road alignment with minimum sediment yield. In Remote sensing-GIS workshop (pp. 27–29). Istanbul.

  • Akay, A. E., Bilici, E., & Çankal, Ş. D. (2016). Visual quality assessment of road network within the forested areas. In FORMEC 2016: from theory to practice: challenges for forest engineering (pp. 173). Poland.

  • Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., & Ugawa, N. (2004). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano river, Niigata prefecture, Japan. Landslides, 1(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, I. D., & Hulse, D. W. (1994). Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumentrath, C., & Tveit, M. S. (2014). Visual characteristics of roads: a literature review of people’s perception and Norwegian design practice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boers, B., & Cottrell, S. (2007). Sustainable tourism infrastructure planning: a GIS-supported approach. Tourism Geographies, 9(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2003). A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 11, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J. B. (1996). Visual and ecological environmental quality model for transportation planning and design. Transportation Research Record, 1549(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J., & Stattersfield, A. J. (1994). Birds to watch 2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series no. 4).

  • Drobne, S., & Lisec, A. (2009). Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica (Slovenia), 33, 459–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düzgüneş, E., & Demirel, Ö. (2015). Evaluation of natural and cultural resource values in national parks with respect to visual landscape quality. İnönü University Journal of Art and Design, 5(12), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. R. (1999). Multi-criteria evaluation and GIS. Geographical Information Systems, 1(1), 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. R., Jin, W., Kyem, P., & Toledano, J. (1995). Raste procedure for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61, 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eker, R., & Aydin, A. (2016). Landslide susceptibility assessment of forest roads. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 2(2), 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2018). What is a z-score? What is a p-value? http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/what-is-a-z-score-what-is-a-p-value.htm. Accessed 8 May 2018.

  • Farkas, A. (2009). Route/site selection of urban transportation facilities: an integrated GIS/MCDM approach. In 7th international conference on management, enterprise and benchmarking (pp. 169–184). Budapest, Hungary.

  • Feizizadeh, B., & Blaschke, T. (2014). An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(3), 610–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliano, S. J., & Loeffler, G. M. (2000). Scenery assessment: scenic beauty at the ecoregion scale. USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW (PNW-GTR-472), 1–30.

  • GDF (2018). General Directorate of Forestry. Forest management maps of kızılcahamam and çamlıdere. Ankara, Türkiye.

  • GEP (2018). Google earth database. Google Earth Pro. https://www.google.com/earth/. Accessed 2 March 2018.

  • Gounaridis, D., & Zaimes, G. (2012). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis applied for environmental issues; the Greek experience. International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 7, 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gülci, S. (2014). Researches on ecological road structures of road networks within and around forests. PhD Thesis, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

  • Gülci, S., & Akay, A. E. (2015). Assessment of ecological passages along road networks within the Mediterranean forest using GIS-based multi criteria evaluation approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2015). Landscape visual quality assessment using GIS in Washtenaw County, MI. https://imagininc.wildapricot.org/resources/SPPC/2015/papers/jiawei_huang_paper.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2019.

  • Jiang, H., & Eastman, J. R. (2000). Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth, R. V. (2016). Java Applets for power and sample size [computer software]. http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power. Accessed 4 June 2019.

  • Malczewski, J. (2000). On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: common and best practice approaches. Transactions in GIS, 4(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion, J. L., & Leung, Y.-F. (2011). Indicators and protocols for monitoring impacts of formal and informal trails in protected areas. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies, 17(2), 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín, B., Pérez, E., Otero, I., & Arce-Ruiz, R. (2016). Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, B., Arce, R., Otero, I., & Loro, M. (2018). Visual landscape quality as viewed from motorways in Spain. Sustainability, 10(8), 2592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCNP. (2019). General directorate of nature conservation and national parks. Ankara: NCNP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, D., & Batuk, F. (2011). Implementation of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis with VB in ArcGIS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10(06), 1023–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener, S., Sener, E., Nas, B., & Karaguzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30(11), 2037–2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen, I., & Yilmaz, S. (2010). Public opinions about the use of highways as scenic roads: the sample of Erzurum-Çaykara-Of route. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(8), 700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi, M., Majnounian, B., Makhdoum, M., Abdi, E., Omid, M., Marchi, E., & Laschi, A. (2019). A GIS-MCDM-based road network planning for tourism development and management in Arasbaran forest, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tampekis, S., Sakellariou, S., Samara, F., Sfougaris, A., Jaeger, D., & Christopoulou, O. (2015). Mapping the optimal forest road network based on the multicriteria evaluation technique: the case study of Mediterranean Island of Thassos in Greece. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(11), 687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temelli, M. (2008). A methodological approach in visual impact assessment work in occupation example of Çukurova University. Msc Thesis: Çukuroava University, Adana, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta, T. (2010). The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: a study of the Veneto plain in Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4), 258–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A., Jaeger, J. A., & Alonso, J. C. (2016). Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(30), 8472–8477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, G. M., & Heath, M. F. (1994). Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International (Bird Life Conservation Series no. 3).

  • Ucar, Z., Akay, E. A., & Taş, İ. (2018). Aesthetic evaluation of road network in forested areas using visual quality assessment method. In 4th International Non-wood forest products symposium. Bursa.

  • Wu, Y., Bishop, I. D., Hossain, H., & Sposito, V. (2006). Using GIS in landscape visual quality assessment. Applied GIS, 2(3), 18.11–18.20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Van Coillie, F., Hens, L., De Wulf, R., Ou, X., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Nature conservation versus scenic quality: a GIS approach towards optimized tourist tracks in a protected area of Northwest Yunnan, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 11(1), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Road planning for a scenic environment based on the dijkstra algorithm : case study of Nanjing Niushou Mountain scenic spot in China. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2, 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Science, Düzce University, Konuralp Campus, 81620, Düzce, Turkey

    Dursun ŞAKAR

  2. Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University , Konuralp Campus, 81620, Düzce, Turkey

    Abdurrahim AYDIN

  3. Faculty of Forestry, Bursa Technical University, 16310, Bursa, Turkey

    Abdullah Emin AKAY

Authors
  1. Dursun ŞAKAR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdurrahim AYDIN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdullah Emin AKAY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Ş., A.A., and A.E.A.; data generation, D.Ş; methodology, D.Ş., A.A., and A.E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Ş.; writing—review and editing, D.Ş., A.A.; visualization, D.Ş.; supervision, A.A. and A.E.A.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dursun ŞAKAR.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ŞAKAR, D., AYDIN, A. & AKAY, A.E. Using GIS-based multicriteria decision support system for planning road networks with visual quality constraints: a case study of protected areas in Ankara, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 192, 447 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08417-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08417-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation