Skip to main content
Log in

Using maintenance records from a long-term sensor monitoring network to evaluate the relationship between maintenance schedule and data quality

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensor-based environmental monitoring networks are beginning to provide the large-scale, long-term data required to address important fundamental and applied questions in ecology. However, the data quality from deployed sensors can be difficult and costly to ensure. In this study, we use maintenance records from the 12-year history of Louisiana’s Coastwide Reference Monitoring System (CRMS) to assess the relationship between various dimensions of data quality and the frequency of field visits to the sensors. We use hierarchical Bayesian models to estimate the probability of missing data, the probability that a corrective offset of the sensor is required, and the magnitude of required offsets for water elevation and salinity data. We compared these estimates to predetermined risk thresholds to the help identify maintenance schedules that balanced the efficient use of labor resources without sacrificing data quality. We found that the relationship between data quality and increasing maintenance interval varied across metrics. Additionally, for most metrics, the maintenance interval when the metric’s credible interval and risk threshold intersected varied throughout the year and with wetland type. These results suggest that complex maintenance schedules, in which field visits vary in frequency throughout the year and with environmental context, are likely to provide the best tradeoff between labor cost and data quality. This analysis demonstrates that quantitative assessment of maintenance records can positively impact the sustainability of long-term data collection projects by helping identify new potential efficiencies in monitoring program management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandari, S., Bergmann, N., Jurdak, R., Kusy, B. (1221). Time series data analysis of wireless sensor network measurements of temperature. Sensors, 17.

  • Campbell, J.L., Rustad, L.E., Porter, J.H., Taylor, J.R., Dereszynski, E.W., Shanley, J.B., Gries, C., Henshaw, D.L., Martin, M.E., Sheldon, W.M., Boorse, E.R. (2013). Quantity is nothing without quality: automated QA/QC for streaming environmental sensor data. Bioscience, 63(7), 574–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S.L., Bettencourt, L.M.A., Hagberg, A., Brown, R.F., Moore, D.I., Bonito, G.D. (2006). New opportunities in ecological sensing using wireless sensor networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 402–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority. (2017). Louisiana’s comprehensive master plan for a sustainable coast. Baton Rouge: Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R.M., & Johnson, F.A. (2003). Bayesian inference and decision theory — a framework for decision making in natural resource management. Ecological Applications, 13, 566–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, T.M., Sharp, L.A., West, J.L., Hymel, M.K., Troutman, J.P., McGinnis, T.E., Weifenbach, D., Boshart, W.M., Rodrigue, L.B., Richardi, D.C., Wood, W.B., Miller, C.M. (2018). A Standard operating procedures manual for the coast-wide reference monitoring system-wetlands: methods for site establishment, data collection, and quality assurance/quality control, (p. 226). Baton Rouge: Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsburg, J.S., Reeder, S.L., Spackman Jones, A., Meline, J. (2015). Open source software for visualization and quality control of continuous hydrologic and water quality sensor data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 70, 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Horsburg, J.S., Eiriksson, D.P. (2018). Assessing subjectivity in environmental sensor data post processing via a controlled experiment. Ecological Informatics, 46, 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, M. (2016). rjags: Bayesian graphical models using MCMC. R package version 4-6.

  • Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., Vines, K. (2006). CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News, 6, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.H., Nagy, E., Kratz, T.K., Hanson, P., Collins, S.L., Arzberger, P. (2009). New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology, 59, 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, M., Wade, A.J., Cohen, M.J., Hensley, R.T., Bowes, M.J., Kirchner, J.W., Arhonditsis, G.B., Jordan, P., Kronvang, B., Halliday, S.J., Skeffington, R.A., Rozemeijer, J.C., Aubert, A.H., Rinke, K., Jomaa, S. (2016). Sensors in the stream: the high-frequency wave of the present. Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 10297–10307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, G.D., Sasser, C.E., Visser, J.M., Swenson, E.M., Nyman, J.A., Raynie, R.C. (2003). A proposed coast-wide reference monitoring system for evaluation wetland restoration trajectories in Louisiana. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 81, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J.M., Sasser, C.E., Chabreck, R.H., Linscombe, R.G. (2002). The impact of a sever drought on the vegetation of a subtropical estuary. Estuaries, 25, 1185–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.J., Boulger, R.W., Oblinger, C.J., Smith, B.A. (2006). Guidlines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors: station operation, record computation, and data reporting. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the CRMS Program, which is administered by CPRA and USGS and is funded through Coastal Wetlands Planning Protection and Restoration Act, the State of Louisiana, with federal resource agencies including the USFWS, NMFS, NRCS, EPA, and USACOE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald R. Schoolmaster Jr..

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoolmaster, D.R., Piazza, S.C. Using maintenance records from a long-term sensor monitoring network to evaluate the relationship between maintenance schedule and data quality. Environ Monit Assess 192, 54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7967-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7967-1

Keywords

Navigation