Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continuous streamflow monitoring in shared watersheds using advanced underwater acoustic tomography system: a case study on Zayanderud River

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iran has experienced a severe drought during the past two decades. Increasing water demand and decreasing available water resources have led the country to critical conflicts, particularly in shared watersheds. In these basins, the precise measurement of releasing water from upstream to downstream can be a key data for resolving water conflicts. The Iranian Ministry of Energy (MOE) makes the streamflow measurements through regional water administrative offices, mainly using the classical rating curve (RC) method. The documented measurements of runoff by adjacent offices usually present different estimations of the water resources, due to high uncertainties of the RC approach. Fluvial acoustic tomography (FAT) is a reliable technology for continuously monitoring streamflow, which can be implemented to solve this problem of shared basins. In this study, FAT is applied to the Zayanderud basin, an Iranian shared watershed and its results are compared with the RC methods. The main terms of FAT streamflow measurement uncertainty are velocity resolution component, and the selected flow angle between the stream direction and acoustic transmission path. Therefore, a new equation is proposed to carefully choose accurate angles for different river widths to decrease FAT measurement error in this paper. The obtained results show that the measured streamflow by FAT and RC are 9.89 m3/s and 10.3 m3/s, respectively, and the largest possible error of FAT is less than 15%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K., & Zhu, X. (2015). Acoustic investigations of tidal bores. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Series B1 (Hydraulic Eng), 71, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K., Danial, M. M., Sawaf, M., & Kagami, J. (2016). Application of shallow-water acoustic tomography to measure flow direction and river discharge. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 51, 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratveit, K., & Olsen, N. R. B. (2015). Calibration of Horizontal Acoustic Doppler Current profilers by three dimensional CFD simulations. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 9, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coz, J. L., Pierrefeu, G., & Paquier, A. (2008). Evaluation of river discharges monitored by a fixed side-looking Doppler profiler. Water Resources Research, 46, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danial, M. M., Kawanisi, K., & Sawaf, M. B. (2019). Characteristics of tidal discharge and phase difference at a tidal channel junction investigated using the fluvial acoustic tomography system. Water, 11(857), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobriyal, P., Badola, R., Tuboi, C., & Hussain, S. A. (2017). A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management. Applied Water Science, 7(6), 2617–2628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herschy, R. W. (2002). The uncertainty in a current meter measurement. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 13, 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibeje, A. O. (2018). Use of lower-order and higher–order streams in modelling the rating curve. Water Resources Management, 33, 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2145-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanisi, K., Kaneko, A., Nigo, S., & Soltaniasl, M. (2010a). New acoustic system for continuous measurement of river discharge and water temperature. Water Science and Engineering, 3, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Kaneko, A., & Watanabe, S. (2010b). Long-term measurement of stream flow and salinity in a tidal river by the use of the fluvial acoustic tomography system. Journal of Hydrology, 380(1-2), 74–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Ishikawa, K., Yano, J., & Soltaniasl, M. (2012). Continuous measurements of flow rate in a shallow gravel-bed river by a new acoustic system. Water Resources Research, 48, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanisi, K., Bahrainimotlagh, M., Sawaf, M., & Razaz, M. (2016). High-frequency streamflow acquisition and bed level/flow angle estimates in a mountainous river using shallow-water acoustic tomography. Hydrological Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10796.

  • Kawanisi, K., Sawaf, M. B., & Danial, M. M. (2018). Automated real-time streamflow acquisition in a mountainous river using acoustic tomography. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001604.

  • Kiang, J. E., Gazoorian, C., McMillan, H., Coxon, G., Le Coz, J., et al. (2018). A comparison of methods for streamflow uncertainty estimation. Water Resources Research, 54, 7149–7176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani, K., & Marino, M. A. (2009). System dynamics analysis for managing Iran’s Zayandeh-rud river basin. Water Resources Management, 23, 2163–2187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, H., Krueger, T., & Freer, J. (2012). Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9384.

  • Medwin, H. (1975). Speed of sound in water: a simple equation for realistic parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380790.

  • Nihei, Y., & Kimizu, A. (2008). A new monitoring system for river discharge with horizontal acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements and river flow simulation. Water Resources Research, 44, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantz, S. (1983). Measurement of streamflow: measurement and discharge and computation volume 1. Measurement of of Stageand discharge. USGS Publication, (pp. 211–226).

  • Razaz, M., Kawanisi, K., Kaneko, A., & Nistor, I. (2015). Application of acoustic tomography to reconstruct the horizontal flow velocity field in a shallow river. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017102.

  • Samadi-Boroujeni, H., & Saeedinia, M. (2013). Study on the impacts of inter-basin water transfer: Northern Karun. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(18), 1996–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaf, M., & Kawanisi, K. (2019). Novel high-frequency acoustic monitoring of streamflow-turbidity dynamics in a gravel-bed river during artificial dam flush. CATENA, 172, 738–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaf, M. B., Kawanisi, K., Kagami, J., Bahreinimotlagh, M., & Danial, M. M. (2017). Scaling characteristics of mountainous river flow fluctuations determined using a shallow-water acoustic tomography system. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 484, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. R., Asce, M., Yen, B. C., & Asce, F. (2008). Theoretical development of stage-discharge ratings for subcritical open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134, 1245–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikorska, A. E., & Renard, B. (2017). Calibrating a hydrological model in stage space to account for rating curve uncertainties: general framework and key challenges. Advances in Water Resources, 105, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloat, J., & Scott Gain, W. (1995). Application of acoustic velocity meters for gaging discharge of three low-velocity tidal streams in the St. Johns River Basin: Northeast Florida. USGS Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltaniasl, M., Kawanisi, K., Yano, J., & Ishikawa, K. (2013). Variability in salt flux and water circulation in Ota River Estuary, Japan. Water Science and Engineering, 6, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, I., Guerrero, J. L., Seibert, J., Beven, K. J., & Halldin, S. (2011). Stage-discharge uncertainty derived with a non-stationary rating curve in the Choluteca River, Honduras. Hydrological Processes, 25, 603–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeroual, A., Meddi, M., & Assani, A. A. (2016). Artificial neural network rainfall-discharge model assessment under rating curve uncertainty and monthly discharge volume predictions. Water Resources Management, 30, 3191–3205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Noriaki Gohda and Prof. Arata Kaneko of Hiroshima University/Aqua Environmental Monitoring Limited Liability Partnership (AEM-LLP) for their strong support in constructing the FAT system.

Funding

This study was funded by the Water Research Institute grant number 320/9609/-12 and Isfahan Regional Water Organization grant number 658201.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Bahreinimotlagh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahreinimotlagh, M., Kawanisi, K., Al Sawaf, M.B. et al. Continuous streamflow monitoring in shared watersheds using advanced underwater acoustic tomography system: a case study on Zayanderud River. Environ Monit Assess 191, 657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7830-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7830-4

Keywords

Navigation