Advertisement

Dynamic eco-efficiency evaluation of the semiconductor industry: a sustainable development perspective

  • Fengyi Lin
  • Sheng-Wei LinEmail author
  • Wen-Min Lu
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Serious environmental problems have accompanied remarkable global economic growth for decades. To assist managers in the semiconductor industry with economic and environmental management, this study executes DuPont analysis to examine economic impacts from the effective implementation of sustainability initiatives. We propose a two-stage process including economic development efficiency and environmental protection efficiency through the dynamic data envelopment analysis (DDEA) to reflect the characteristics of eco-efficiency. Through DuPont analysis, the main finding shows the potential improvement in firms’ return on equity (ROE) by efficiently utilizing assets to generate sales quickly.

Relative to economic development efficiency, the firms show lower scores and higher standard deviations in the environmental protection ability, thus denoting a large gap in the level of environmental protection production technology. The findings in this study reveal that the financial foundations and sustainable development of industries should be improved simultaneously even though specific levels of semiconductor industrial eco-efficiency improvement vary among companies in Taiwan.

Keywords

Eco-efficiency Dynamic network data envelopment analysis DuPont analysis 

Notes

Supplementary material

10661_2019_7598_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Acquaye, A., Ibn-Mohammed, T., Genovese, A., Afrifa, G. A., Yamoah, F. A., & Oppon, E. (2018). A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borozan, D. (2018). Technical and total factor energy efficiency of European regions: A two-stage approach. Energy, 152, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, K. J., Chichernea, D. C., & HassabElnaby, H. R. (2014). On the DuPont analysis in the health care industry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, T. (2013). A systematic cycle time reduction procedure for enhancing the competitiveness and sustainability of a semiconductor manufacturer. Sustainability, 5(11), 4637–4652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, L., Lai, F., Wang, Y.-M., Huang, Y., & Wu, F.-M. (2018). A two-stage network data envelopment analysis approach for measuring and decomposing environmental efficiency. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drezewski, R., Kruk, S., & Makowka, M. (2018). The evolutionary optimization of a company’s return on equity factor: Towards the agent-based bio-inspired system supporting corporate finance decisions. IEEE Access, 6, 51911–51930.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egilmez, G., Kucukvar, M., & Park, Y. S. (2016). Mode-specific eco-efficiency analysis of the freight transportation in the USA: An integrated life cycle assessment and linear programming approach. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 6(1), 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galagedera, Watson, J., Premachandra, I., & Chen, Y. (2016). Modeling leakage in two-stage DEA models: An application to US mutual fund families. Omega, 61, 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galagedera, Roshdi, I., Fukuyama, H., & Zhu, J. (2018). A new network DEA model for mutual fund performance appraisal: An application to U.S. equity mutual funds. Omega, 77, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green – A systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo, C., Abbasi Shureshjani, R., Foroughi, A. A., & Zhu, J. (2017). Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 896–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habibzadeh, F. (2017). Statistical data editing in scientific articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(7), 1072–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halkos, G., & Petrou, K. N. (2018). Assessing waste generation efficiency in EU regions towards sustainable environmental policies. Sustainable Development, 26(3), 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2016). Measuring sustainability efficiency using a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1159–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Gholami, K., & Beigi, Z. G. (2014). A bounded data envelopment analysis model in a fuzzy environment with an application to safety in the semiconductor industry. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164(2), 679–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatami-Marbini, A., Agrell, P. J., Tavana, M., & Khoshnevis, P. (2017). A flexible cross-efficiency fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for sustainable sourcing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2761–2779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, T. Q., Hoang, V.-N., Wilson, C., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2018). Eco-efficiency analysis of sustainability-certified coffee production in Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu, L.-C. (2015). Using a decision-making process to evaluate efficiency and operating performance for listed semiconductor companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(2), 301–331.  https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.876689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu, W., Guo, Y., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2019). Eco-efficiency of centralized wastewater treatment plants in industrial parks: A slack-based data envelopment analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hung, S.-W., He, D.-S., & Lu, W.-M. (2014). Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan′s semiconductor industry. Omega, 46, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iqbal, A., Allan, A., & Afroze, S. (2017). Analysis of transport eco-efficiency scenarios to support sustainability assessment: A study on Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(8), 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jebali, E., Essid, H., & Khraief, N. (2017). The analysis of energy efficiency of the Mediterranean countries: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Energy, 134, 991–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ji, X., Wu, J., Zhu, Q., & Sun, J. (2018). Using a hybrid heterogeneous DEA method to benchmark China’s sustainable urbanization: An empirical study. Annals of Operations Research, 1–55.Google Scholar
  26. Koltai, T., Lozano, S., Uzonyi-Kecskés, J., & Moreno, P. (2017). Evaluation of the results of a production simulation game using a dynamic DEA approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laso, J., García-Herrero, I., Margallo, M., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Fullana, P., Bala, A., Gazulla, C., Irabien, Á., & Aldaco, R. (2018). Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, Liu, B.-l., Liu, W.-l., & Chiu, Y.-H. (2017). Efficiency evaluation of the regional high-tech industry in China: A new framework based on meta-frontier dynamic DEA analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 60, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, H., He, H., Shan, J., & Cai, J. (2018). Innovation efficiency of semiconductor industry in China: A new framework based on generalized three-stage DEA analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.Google Scholar
  30. Lin, F., Lin, S.-W., & Lu, W.-M. (2018). Sustainability assessment of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry: A new hybrid model using combined analytic hierarchy process and two-stage additive network data envelopment analysis. Sustainability, 10(11), 4070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu, X., Guo, P., & Guo, S. (2019). Assessing the eco-efficiency of a circular economy system in China’s coal mining areas: Emergy and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 1101–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moldovan, I. A. (2015). Does the financial system promote sustainable development? Evidence from eastern European countries. Central European Business Review, 4(2), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moutinho, V., Fuinhas, J. A., Marques, A. C., & Santiago, R. (2018a). Assessing eco-efficiency through the DEA analysis and decoupling index in the Latin America countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 512–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moutinho, V., Madaleno, M., Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Dogan, E. (2018b). Factors affecting CO 2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: A LMDI decomposition application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Müller, K., Holmes, A., Deurer, M., & Clothier, B. E. (2015). Eco-efficiency as a sustainability measure for kiwifruit production in New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rakićević, A., Milošević, P., Petrović, B., & Radojević, D. (2016). DuPont financial ratio analysis using logical aggregation. In Soft computing applications (pp. 727–739). Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Rashidi, K., & Saen, R. F. (2015). Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Economics, 50, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shen, C.-w., Tran, P., & Minh Ly, P. (2018). Chemical waste management in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Sustainability, 10(5), 1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simic, V., & Dimitrijevic, B. (2013). Risk explicit interval linear programming model for long-term planning of vehicle recycling in the EU legislative context under uncertainty. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 823–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Song, M., Wang, S., & Liu, W. (2014). A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(5), 3041–3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 42(1), 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsai, C.-H., Wu, H.-Y., Chen, I. S., Chen, J.-K., & Ye, R.-W. (2017). Exploring benchmark corporations in the semiconductor industry based on efficiency. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(2), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valente, A., Iribarren, D., Galvez-Martos, J. L., & Dufour, J. (2019). Robust eco-efficiency assessment of hydrogen from biomass gasification as an alternative to conventional hydrogen: A life-cycle study with and without external costs. Science of the Total Environment, 650(Pt 1, 1465–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, C.-N., & Ho, H.-X. T. (2016). The selection strategic alliance partner in semiconductor manufacturing industry based on grey system and DEA. 83–87.Google Scholar
  48. Wanke, P., Barros, C. P., & Faria, J. R. (2015). Financial distress drivers in Brazilian banks: A dynamic slacks approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. WBCSD, A. (2000). Eco-efficiency. Creating more value with less impact (p. 32). Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  50. Wu, Yin, P., Sun, J., Chu, J., & Liang, L. (2016). Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: An interest preference perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 1047–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu, Y., Chen, Z., & Xia, P. (2018). An extended DEA-based measurement for eco-efficiency from the viewpoint of limited preparation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xing, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2018). Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of China’s economic sectors: An economic input-output based frontier approach. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xiong, Yang, G.-l., & Guan, Z.-c. (2018). Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 784–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, L., & Zhang, X. (2018). Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: A bootstrapping approach in global data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yin, K., Wang, R., An, Q., Yao, L., & Liang, J. (2014). Using eco-efficiency as an indicator for sustainable urban development: A case study of Chinese provincial capital cities. Ecological Indicators, 36, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou, H., & Hu, H. (2017). Sustainability evaluation of railways in China using a two-stage network DEA model with undesirable outputs and shared resources. Sustainability, 9(1), 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu, Z., Wang, K., & Zhang, B. (2014). Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: A case study of pesticides. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business ManagementNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.College of ManagementNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Financial ManagementNational Defense UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations