Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Island soil quality assessment and the relationship between soil quality and land-use type/topography

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information about the soil quality of different land-use types and topographies is essential for the sustainable development, utilization, and protection of soil resource in coastal areas. In this study, representative topsoil samples were collected from Liandao Island, China, and soil water content (SWC), soil bulk density (BD), total nitrogen (TN), soil organic matter (SOM), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), soil salt content (SSC), and pH were recorded. The suitable minimum soil data set (MDS) was computed by principal component analysis (PCA) and the soil quality index (SQI) was then determined. The spatial distribution of the SQI was analyzed using ordinary kriging interpolation. The effects of topographical parameters (digital elevation model [DEM], slope, and aspect) and land-use types (vegetation [V], water resource conservancy land [WRC], sandy land [SL], unused land [UL], and built-up land [BL]) on SQI were then analyzed in detail. The parameters included in the MDS were TN, pH, and BD, which together accounted for 84.371% of the variation in soil quality. The SQI varied from 0.189 to 0.772 in the study area. The correlation coefficients between SQI and DEM, slope, and aspect were 0.498, 0.294, and 0.137, respectively (p < 0.01). The highest SQI score was found at an elevation of 110 m, with a slope of 68.2° and an aspect of 246.6, in the vegetation land-use type. Soil quality differed significantly (p = 0.0000) among the land-use types, with the following ranking: V > UL > SL > BL. Our results provide land managers with an important reference for the development, utilization, and protection of soil resource in coastal zones such as Liandao Island, China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R. (2001). Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 11(6), 1573–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Mitchell, J. P. (2002). A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 90(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askari, M. S., & Holden, N. M. (2014). Indices for quantitative evaluation of soil quality under grassland management. Geoderma, s230–231(7), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Capistros, F., Hugé, J., & Koedam, N. (2014). Environmental impacts on the Galapagos islands: identification of interactions, perceptions and steps ahead. Ecological Indicators, 38(3), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F., & Konopka, A. E. (1994). Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(5), 1501–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. D., Wang, H. Y., Zhou, J. M., Xing, L., Zhu, B. S., Zhao, Y. C., & Chen, X. Q. (2013). Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of Northeast China. Pedosphere, 23(5), 564–576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Y., Shi, H. H., Guo, Z., & Ding, D. W. (2015). Connotation, features and causes of island ecological vulnerability. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 37(12), 93–105 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Y., Shi, H., Wang, Y., Guo, Z., & Wang, E. (2017). Evaluation on island ecological vulnerability and its spatial heterogeneity. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 125, 216–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ditzler, C. A., & Tugel, A. J. (2002). Soil quality field tools. Journal of Agronomy, 94(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy, V., Singh, S. K., Ray, S. K., Perumal Duraisami, V., Tiwary, P., Chandran, P., Nimkar, A. M., & Anantwar, S. G. (2016). Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India. Geoderma, 282, 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, M. E., Galantini, J. A., Martínez, J. M., López, F. M., & Wall, L. G. (2016). Sensitivity of different soil quality indicators to assess sustainable land management: influence of site features and seasonality. Soil & Tillage Research, 159, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Q. X. (2013). Study on soil quality evaluation tool and its application. J Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 44, 496–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Romero, M. L., Parras-Alcántara, L., Lozano-García, B., Clark, J. M., & Collins, C. D. (2016). Soil quality assessment based on carbon stratification index in different olive grove management practices in Mediterranean areas. Catena, 137, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. D., Reganold, I. P., Andrews, P., & K. (2000). Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional, organic, and integrated apple orchards in Washington state. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 80, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, C., Ma, L., Cheng, H., Liu, Y., Xu, D., Li, B., Liu, F., Ren, Y., Liu, Z., Zhao, C., Yang, K., Nie, H., & Lang, C. (2014). Characterization of the particle size fraction associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 139, 109–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, L., Ran, Q. Y., He, G. X., & Tiyip, T. (2015). A soil quality assessment under different land use types in Keriya river basin, Southern Xinjiang, China. Soil & Tillage Research, 146, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, B., Sayre, K. D., & Deckers, J. (2006). A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil & Tillage Research, 87(2), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L. L., Sun, Z. G., Ouyang, Z., Han, D. R., & Li, F. D. (2017). A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River. Catena, 152, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Wu, G. F., Jiang, H., Zhang, X. Y., Xu, J. B., & Li, H. X. (2001). Soil quality evaluation based on Geographic Information System and gray relative comprehensive evaluation model. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Sciebce Edition), 29, 39–42 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Karlen, D. L., Andrews S. S., Wienhold B. J., & Doran J. W. (2003) Soil quality: Humankind’s foundation for survival. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 58, 171–179.

  • Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61, 4–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khormali, F., Ajami, A., Ayoubi, S., Srinivasarao, C. H., & Wani, S. P. (2009). Role of deforestation and hillslope position on soil quality attributes of loess-derived soils in Golestan province, Iran. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 134, 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, W.E., & Pierce F.J. (1991). Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In J. Dumanski, E. Pushparajah, M. Latham, & R. Myers (Eds.), Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. Vol. 2: Technical Papers. Proc. Int. Workshop., Chiang Rai, Thailand. 15–21 Sept. Int. Board for Soil Res. and Management, Bangkok.

  • Legaz, B. V., Souza, D. M. D., Teixeira, R. F. M., Antón, A., Putman, B., & Sala, S. (2016). Soil quality, properties, and functions in life cycle assessment: an evaluation of models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(2), 502–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. M., Ai, T. C., & Zhou, Z. (2001). Evaluation of soil fertility by principal component analysis. J Journal of Geographical Research and Development., 20(65–67), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. F., Tang, J., Lin, N. F., & Yang, Y. D. (2003). Application of Grey system theory in evaluating grassland soil quality. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 25(5), 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. L., Chen, J., Sun, Z. Y., & Tan, M. Z. (2007). Establishing a minimum dataset for soil quality assessment based on soil properties and land-use changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(7), 2715–2724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Zhang, C., & Wang, K. (2012). Comparison of geographically weighted regression and regression kriging for estimating the spatial distribution of soil organic matter. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 49, 915–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. X., Wang, Z. H., Miao, Y. F., & Li, S. Q. (2014). Soil organic nitrogen and its contribution to crop production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(10), 2061–2080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, G. T., Li, T. X., & Wang, Y. D. (2007). Evaluation of soil fertility quality of low mountain tea garden based on GIS and geostatistics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 5, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. M., Deng, H. J., Du, K., Li, J., Han, L., Chen, C., Fisher, L., Wu, C. Z., Hong, T., & Zhang, G. S. (2017). Soil quality assessment in different climate zones of China’s Wenchuan earthquake affected region. Soil & Tillage Research, 165, 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. S. (1996). Soil physical and chemical analysis and description of soil profiles. Beijing: Standards press of China (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. H. (2006). Application of 3S technology in monitoring and evaluation of soil erosion in Xiamen City. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 26, 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. J., Zhou, W., Shen, J. B., Li, S. T., Liang, G. Q., Wang, X. B., Sun, J. W., & Ai, C. (2014). Soil quality assessment of acid sulfate paddy soils with different productivities in Guangdong Province, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(1), 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Granados, F., Jurado-Exposito, M., Pena-Barragan, J. M., & Garcia-Torres, L. (2005). Using geostatistical and remote sensing approaches for mapping soil properties. European Journal of Agronomy, 23, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzaioli, R., D’Ascoli, R., De Pascale, R. A., & Rutigliano, F. A. (2010). Soil quality in a Mediterranean area of southern Italy as related to different land use types. Applied Soil Ecology, 44, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. (1963). Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58(8), 1246–1266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo-Mbogba, M., Yemefack, M., & Nyeck, B. (2015). Assessing soil quality under different land cover types within shifting agriculture in South Cameroon. Soil & Tillage Research, 150, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, F., Liang, C., & Fu, Q. (2002). Application of matter element model based on stratification analysis method in soil quality evaluation. Research of Agricultural Modernization., 23, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz-Kagan, T., Shachak, M., Zaady, E., & Karnieli, A. (2014). A spectral soil quality index (SSQI) for characterizing soil function in areas of changed land use. Geoderma, (230–231), 171–184.

  • Pham, H. N., Nguyen, H. X., & Nguyen, A. N. (2015). Aggregate indices method in soil quality evaluation using the relative soil quality index. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 1–8.

  • Pierce, F. J., Larso, W. E., & Dowdy, R. H. (1983). Productivity of soils: assessing long- term changes due to erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38, 9–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, S. A., Gilkes, R. J., & Andrews, S. S. (2006). A minimum data set for assessing soil quality in rangelands. Geoderma, 136(1), 229–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Q. S., Wang, Y., Wang, X. R., Liu, X., Zhang, X. Y., & Zhang, S. L. (2019). Comparing interpolation methods to predict soil total phosphorus in the Mollisol area of Northeast China. Catena., 174, 59–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil survey staff,. (1993). Soil survey manual. United States department of agriculture. Hnbk No. 18. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Stevenson, F. J. (1982). Organic forms of soil nitrogen. In F. J. Stevenson (Ed.), Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Madison: America Society of Agronomy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, D., & Rattan, L. A. (2016). Standardized soil quality index for diverse field conditions. The Science of the Total Environment, 541, 424–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. J., Zhao, Y. G., & Guo, M. (2010). Study on soil quality evaluation of cultivated land at county level based on GIS and fuzzy mathematics. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 42, 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. Y., Yang, Z. F., & Yu, T. (2011). Research progress of soil quality evaluation. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 39(36), 22617–22622 22657(in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Zhang, C., & Li, W. (2013). Predictive mapping of soil total nitrogen at a regional scale: a comparison between geographically weighted regression and cokriging. Applied Geography, (42), 73–85.

  • Warkentin, B.P., & Fletcher H.F. (1977). Soil quality for intensive agriculture. Proc. Int. Sem. on Soil Environ. and Fert. Manage. in Intensive Agric. Soc. Sci. Soil and Manure, Natl. Inst. of Agric. Sci., Tokyo.

  • Xia, J., Li, T. X., & Deng, L. J. (2000). Application of principal component analysis in cultivated land quality evaluation. Journal of Southwest China Agricultural University, 13, 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, R. J., Yang, J. S., Gao, P., Zhang, J. B., & Jin, W. H. (2013). Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area. Soil & Tillage Research, 128, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemefack, M., Jetten, V. G., & Rossiter, D. G. (2006). Developing a minimum data set for characterizing soil dynamics in shifting cultivation systems. Soil & Tillage Research, 86(1), 84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. J., Liu, S. W., Zhang, L., Li, Q., & Zhou, D. W. (2018). Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617, 564–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.F. (2004). Evaluation of wetland eco-environmental quality based on 3S technology - a case study of Wild Yalu Lake Wetland. D. Beijing: School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University. 5, 1–81.

  • Zhang, S. J., He, Y., & Hui, F. (2003). Spatial variability of soil properties in the field based on GPS and GIS. Transactions of the CSAE., 19(2), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Wei, Z. F., & Gao, M. (2006). Progress of soil quality evaluation method. J Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 37, 999–1006 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. G., Bai, J. H., Xi, M., Zhao, Q. Q., & Lu, Q. Q. (2016). Soil quality assessment of coastal wetlands in the Yellow River Delta of China based on the minimum data set. Ecological Indicators, 66, 458–466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, R., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, X., Ma, C., Wang, L., & Gao, X. J. (2016). Land use effects on the distribution and speciation of heavy metals and arsenic in coastal soils on Chongming Island in the Yangtze River Estuary, China. Pedosphere, 26(1), 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yanan Wu, Xiaojing Wang, and Yang Gu for their assistance with the field investigation.

Funding

This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41506106, no. 31270745); the Key Laboratory for Geo-Environmental Monitoring of Coastal Zone of the National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geo-information (no. GE-2017-003); the Pioneer Science and Technology Special Training Program B (no. XDPB11-01-04) of Chinese Academy of Sciences; and the China-Italy Collaborate Project for Lunar Surface Mapping (no. 2016YFE0104400).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geomatics and Marine Information, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Lianyungang, 222005, China

    Xia Lu, Yali Lin, Sen Zhang & Qian Zhao

  2. Jiangsu Coastal Zone Environment Research Institute, Lianyungang, 222005, Jiangsu, China

    Xia Lu, Yali Lin, Sen Zhang & Qian Zhao

  3. Key Lab of Lunar Science and Deep-exploration, National Astronomical Observatories, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yuanzhi Zhang

  4. School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yuanzhi Zhang

Authors
  1. Xia Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanzhi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yali Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qian Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XL conceived and designed the experiments; SZ, YL, and QZ performed the experiments; XL and SZ processed and analyzed the data; YL improved the data analysis; XL and YZ wrote the paper; XL contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanzhi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y. et al. Island soil quality assessment and the relationship between soil quality and land-use type/topography. Environ Monit Assess 191, 230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7366-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7366-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation