Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of drainage problems in Antalya Konyaalti parks in the context of landscape engineering

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, factors that cause drainage problems in 23 Nisan Park and Mevlana Park have been investigated in the scope of landscape design and landscape engineering. To propose regulations to protect the natural topography and natural drainage lines, evaluations and observations were conducted, and these data were digitized. Water accumulation analyses were performed using field observations, which were used to create a water accumulation analysis map that was compared with water collection area maps created using Arc Hydro extension in ArcGIS. The results show that surface waters accumulate in areas such as pedestrian ways and playgrounds due to deficiencies in landscape design. Surface water quantities were calculated using the rational method. To prevent structural damage and excessive water entry, deep drainage and concrete or grass-covered parabolic surface drainage systems are recommended. Additional suggestions are provided for other studies to be conducted in this regard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achleinter, S. (2007). An open source approach for simulation of integrated urban drainage systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1184–1195, Austria. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley, W., Reilly, T., & Franke. (1999). Sustainability of ground–water resources. Denver: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1186.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altunkasa, M. F. (2002). Landscape engineering. Çukuroba University, Agriculture, General Publication, (123).

  • Dobbins, D. V. (1960). Surface water drainage. Notre Dame Law, 36, 518. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol36/iss4/5. Accessed 06 June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, N., & Hitchmough, J. (2007). The dynamic landscape: design, ecology and management of naturalistic urban planting. Taylor & Francis, ISBN: 978–0415438100, Spon Press Publishing, (49).

  • French, R. J., & Schultz, J. E. (1984). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(6), 743–764. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9840743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Directorate of Meteorology (2014). Chart of Antalya City rainfall intensity over time. Ankara: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Meteorology.

  • Güngör, S., & Polat, A. T. (2017). The evaluation of the urban parks in Konya province in terms of quality, sufficiency, maintenance, and growth rate. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(4), 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5875-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, B. A. (2010). Hydrological Procedure No: 5. Rational Method of Flood Estimation for Rural Catchments in Peninsular Malaysıa. Division Of Water Resources Management And Hydrology Department Of Irrigation And Drainage Ministry Of Natural Resources And Environment, pp. 19.

  • Loucks, D. P., & Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. Cambridge University Press (138).

  • Mays, L. (2006). Water resources sustainability. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional ISBN: 978–0071462303, (140).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oğuz, D. (1998). A research on the usage of Ankara urban parks as a concept of urban park, PhD thesis Ankara University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00130-4 (220).

  • Ostermann, F. O. (2010). Digital representation of park use and visual analysis of visitor activities. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, S., Nielsen, K., & Goodenough, R. (1994). Managing urban parks: user perspectives and local leisure needs in the 1990s. Service Industries Journal, 14(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069400000024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T., Alfredo, K., & Fisher, J. (2014). Sustainable water management in urban, agricultural, and natural systems. Water, 6(12), 3934–3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6123934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, T. G., Thomas, M., & Ettrich, N. (2004). Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. Journal of Hydrology, 299(3–4), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. (2006). The rational method. David B. Thompson Civil Engineering Department Texas Tech University, pp. 1–7.

  • United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21. In Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janero, Brazil.

  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UN WCED). (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; Document A/42/427. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, S. (2005). User satisfaction in rural recreation areas: the example of Bolu Gölcük Forest-recreation area. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University, Master Thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.

  • Walker, C. (2004). The public value of urban parks, Urban Institute, (20).

Download references

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Unit of Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey (Project Code 2013.02.0121.005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhun Soydan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 7 A1 segment drainage system information of 23 Nisan Park

Appendix 2

Table 8 A2 segment drainage system information of 23 Nisan Park

Appendix 3

Table 9 B1 segment drainage system information of 23 Nisan Park

Appendix 4

Table 10 B2 segment drainage system information of 23 Nisan Park

Appendix 5

Table 11 B3 segment drainage system information of 23 Nisan Park

Appendix 6

Table 12 A segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Appendix 7

Table 13 B segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Appendix 8

Table 14 C segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Appendix 9

Table 15 D segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Appendix 10

Table 16 E segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Appendix 11

Table 17 F segment drainage system information of Mevlana Park

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soydan, O., Benliay, A. Evaluation of drainage problems in Antalya Konyaalti parks in the context of landscape engineering. Environ Monit Assess 191, 37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7178-1

Keywords

Navigation