Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying representative watershed for the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designation of representative watersheds (RWs) as a reference area representing key behavior of the whole region is an essential tool to provide a time and cost-effective basis for monitoring watershed performance against different driving forces. It is more important in developing countries facing lack of necessary investments in one hand and ever-increasing human interventions and need to assess the outcome behavior of the system in another hand. However, this serious affair has been less considered worldwide, in general, and in developing countries, in particular. Therefore, in the present study, a quantitative-based method of Representative Watershed Index (RWI) with potential range from 0 to 100 has been formulated using four important criteria and available national-wide raster data of elevation (meter), slope (%), rainfall erosivity factor (t m ha−1 cm h−1), and land use. The approach was then applied to the data prepared for the unique and invaluable global water ecosystem of the Urmia Lake Basin (ULB), north-western Iran, as a case study. The input raster was overlaid via matrices programming in the MATrix LABoratory (MATLAB) 2016 and Geographic Information System (GIS) 9.3 software environments. The RWIs were accordingly computed for 61 sub-watersheds of the ULB. The RWIs resulted from quadri-partite dimensional matrices that varied from 5.54 to 53.46 with respective maximum dissimilarity and resemblance with the entire 61 study sub-watersheds in the region. However, the sub-watershed with RWI of 40.65 (No. 57) was proposed as the final RW for the whole ULB due to hydrological independency, appropriate locality, and existence of functioning meteorological and hydrometric stations. The identified RW would be suggested to be considered as the basis for future insight monitoring and assessing environmental issues for the region eventually leading to an appropriate adaptive watershed management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rahaman, S., Abdul Ajeez, S., Aruchamy, S., & Jegankumar, R. (2015). Prioritization of sub watershed based on morphometric characteristics using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and geographical information system—a study of Kallar watershed. In Tamil Nadu international conference on water resources, costal and oceans engineering, (ICWRCOE 2015) (Vol. 4, pp. 132–1330).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhami, M., & Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2016). Sub-watershed prioritization based on sediment yield using game theory. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 977–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AGU (American Geophysical Union). (1965). Inventory of representative and experimental watershed studies conducted in the United States. Symposium on representative and experimental watershed studies conducted in the United States, under the auspices of the Section of Hydrology, American Geophysical Union, Budapest, Hungary, Washington, D.C., 156 p.

  • Altaf, S., Meraj, G., & Romshoo, S. A. (2014). Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(12), 8391–8412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. M., Cooke, S., & MacAlpine, N. (1998). Watershed selection for the AESA stream water quality monitoring program. In Report of Alberta environmentally sustainable agriculture (p. 159). Edmonton: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arami, S. A., Alvandi, E., Frootandanesh, M., Tahmasebipour, N., & Sangchini, E. K. (2017). Prioritization of watersheds in order to perform administrative measures using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 67(1), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbor, A. (2010). Great lakes watershed ecological sustainability strategy (GLWESS): watershed characterization and selection of candidate pilot watersheds. Great Lakes Protection Fund and the GLWESS Project Advisory Panel (PAP) in collaboration with the Nature Conservancy, August 17, Michigan, 52 p.

  • Arsenault, R., Bazile, R., Ouellet Dallaire, C., & Brissette, F. (2016). CANOPEX: a Canadian hydrometeorological watershed database. Hydrological Processes, 30(15), 2734–2736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasik, K., Gorski, D., & Mitchell, J. K. (2001). Rainfall erosivity for East and Central Poland. International symposium on soil erosion research for the 21st century. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 279–282.

  • Bradford, R. B., Marsh, T. J. (2003). Defining a network of benchmark catchments for the UK. In: Proceeding of Institution of Civil Engineers-Water and Maritime Engineering, Thomas Telford Ltd, 156(2), 109–116.

  • Brown, L. C., & Foster, G. R. (1987). Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distributions. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 30, 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. C. (2016). Integrated management of large rivers and their watersheds. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 16(4), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment (DOE). (2013). Urmia Lake: challenges, actions, and the way forward. Iran: Urmia Lake Restoration Staff 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H., Hannaford, J., & Fry, M. J. (2013). The effective management of national hydrometric data: experiences from the United Kingdom. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(7), 1383–1399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dortignac, E. J., Beattie, B. (1965). Using representative watersheds to manage forest and range lands for improved water yield. In: IASH Symposium on Representative and Experimental Areas, Budapest, Hungary, 66, 480–488.

  • Ebisemiju, F. S. (1979). An objective criterion for the selection of representative watersheds. Water Resources Research, 15, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Q.A., Kulikov, S.M., Garner-O’Neale, L.D., Metcalfe, C.D. Sultana, T. (2017). Contaminants of emerging concern in surface waters in Barbados, West Indies. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(12), 636 p, 636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimanifar, A., & Mohebbi, F. (2007). Urmia Lake (northwest Iran): a brief review. Saline Systems, 3(5), 8 p), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfanian, M., Ghahramani, P., & Saadat, H. (2014). Mapping of potential soil erosion hazard using fuzzy logic in Gharnave Watershed, Golestan Province. Journal of Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering, 7, 43–52 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfanian, M., Bayazi, M., Abghari, H., & Esmali Ouri, A. (2015a). Monthly simulation of streamflow and sediment using the SWAT in Nazlochai and prioritization of critical regions. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 7, 552–562 (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfanian, M., Ghaharahmani, P., & Saadat, H. (2015b). Assessment of soil erosion risk using a fuzzy model in Gharnaveh watershed, Golestan province. Journal Water and Soil Conservation, 21, 135–154 (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • España-Villanueva, M. R., & Valenzuela-Montes, L. M. (2017). The role of information in plans for progressing in IWLRM. Land Use Policy, 67, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah, M., Kavian, A., & Omidvar, E. (2016). Watershed prioritization in order to implement soil and water conservation practices. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(1248) 17 p.

  • Farsadnia, F., Kamrood, M. R., Nia, A. M., Modarres, R., Bray, M. T., Han, D., & Sadatinejad, J. (2014). Identification of homogeneous regions for regionalization of watersheds by two-level self-organizing feature maps. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathian, F., Morid, S., & Kahya, E. (2015). Identification of trends in hydrological and climatic variables in Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 119(3–4), 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghumman, A.R., Al-Salamah, I.S., AlSaleem, S.S., Haider, H. (2017). Evaluating the impact of lower resolutions of digital elevation model on rainfall-runoff modeling for ungauged catchments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(2), 54 p, 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford, J., Holmes, M. G. R., Laize, C. L. R., Marsh, T. J., & Young, A. R. (2013). Evaluating hydrometric networks for prediction in ungauged watersheds: a new methodology and its application to England and Wales. Hydrology Research, 44(3), 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh, E., Zarghami, M., & Hassanzadeh, Y. (2012). Determining the main factors in declining the Urmia Lake level by using system dynamics modeling. Water Resources Management, 26(1), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazbavi, Z., & Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2017). Watershed health characterization using reliability-resilience-vulnerability conceptual framework based on hydrological responses. Land Degradation and Development, 28, 1528–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazbavi, Z., Baartman, J. E. M., Nunes, J. P., Keesstra, S. D., & Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2018a). Changeability of reliability, resilience and vulnerability indicators with respect to drought patterns. Ecological Indicators, 87, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazbavi, Z., Keesstra, S. D., Nunes, J. P., Baartman, J. E. M., Gholamalifard, M., & Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2018b). Health comparative comprehensive assessment of watersheds with different climates. Ecological Indicators, 93, 781–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, I. W. (1998). Integrated watershed management, principles and practice. New York: Wiley 414 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, G., & Rothwell, R. (2016). Spring Creek representative and experimental watershed project. The Forestry Chronicle, 92(1), 43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holko, L., Miklánek, P. (2003). Interdisciplinary approaches in small catchment hydrology: monitoring and research. Proceedings, UNESCO, 67 p.

  • Jaiswala, R. K., Ghoshb, N. C., Galkatea, R. V., & Thomasa, T. (2015). Multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for watershed prioritization. Journal of Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1553–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joris, D., & Jean, P. (2005). Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Journal of Earth Science Reviews, 71(1), 95–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaledi Darvishan, A., Adhami, M., Katebikord, A., Gholami, L., Feizi, V., Ghasempouri, S. M., Rastgar, A., Mohammadamini, H., Gholamalifard, M., & Ownagh, M. (2017). Assessment of the environmental diversity of Iran. A project as part of mega project on the Integrated Watershed Management Project in Iran. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 476 p.

  • Khanna, S. A., Shrestha, K. L., Maskey, R. K., Lamsal, A., Pyakurel, K., Poudyal, M., Ranjit, M., Karki, D., Aryal, R., & Shrestha, A. (2017). Integrated water resource management (IWRM): a case study of Durlung Watershed, Bagmati Zone, Nepal. Hydro Nepal, Journal of Water, Energy and Environment, 18, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatami, S., Berndtsson, R. (2013). Urmia Lake Basin restoration in Iran: short- and long-term perspectives. Environmental & Water Resources Institute (EWRI)/American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 12 p, Available at: http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5453131/5364733.pdf.

  • Laize, C. L. R. (2004). Integration of spatial datasets to support the review of hydrometric networks and identification of representative catchments. Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8(6), 1103–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laize, C. L. R., & Marsh, T. J. (2006). The use of spatial information to improve hydrometric network design and evaluation. IAHS Publication, 308, 56 p.

  • Laize, C. L. R., Marsh, T. J., Morris, D. G. 2008. Catchment descriptors to optimise hydrometric networks. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, Thomas Telford Ltd. 161(3), 117–125.

  • Lee, K. S., & Chung, E. (2007). Development of integrated watershed management schemes for intensively urbanized region in Korea. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 1(2), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Sivapalan, M., & Zehe, E. (2005). Representative elementary watershed (REW) approach: a new blueprint for distributed hydrological modelling at the catchment scale. Publications—International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 301, 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makwana, J., & Tiwari, M. K. (2016). Prioritization of agricultural sub-watersheds in semi arid middle region of Gujarat using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(137), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy (MOE). (2012). Guidelines and criteria for classification and coding watershed and study areas in Iran, Office of Deputy for Strategic Supervision, Ministry of Energy, Department of Technical Affairs and Bureau of Engineering and Technical Criteria for Water and Wastewater, 130, 1–150.

  • Montenegro, S. M., da Silva, B. B., Antonino, A. C., Lima, J. R., de Souza, E. S., de Oliveira, L. M., de Moura, A. E., & Souza, R. M. S. (2014). Hydrological studies in experimental and representative watersheds in Pernambuco State, Brazil. In Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (Vol. 364, pp. 422–428).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi Dashtpagerdi, M., Vagharfard, H., Honarbakhsh, A., & Khoorani, A. (2013). GIS based fuzzy logic approach for identification of groundwater artificial recharge site. Journal of Geology, 3, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narimani, R., Erfanian, M., Nazarnejad, H., & Mahmodzadeh, A. (2017). Evaluating the impact of management scenarios and land use changes on annual surface runoff and sediment yield using the GeoWEPP: a case study from the Lighvanchai Watershed, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(9), 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naubi, I., Zardari, N. H., Shirazi, S. M., Roslan, N. A., Yusop, Z., & Haniffah, M. R. B. M. (2017). Ranking of Skudairiver sub-watersheds from sustainability indices—application of premethee method. International Journal of GEOMATE, 12(29), 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, P., & Blengini, G. A. (2018). Towards better monitoring of technology critical elements in Europe: coupling of natural and anthropogenic cycles. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., Yu, B., Klik, A., Lim, K. J., Yang, J. E., Ni, J., Miao, C., Chattopadhyay, N., Sadeghi, S. H. R., Hazbavi, Z., Zabihi, M., Larionov, G. A., Krasnov, S. F., Gorobets, A. V., Levi, Y., Erpul, G., Birkel, C., Hoyos, N., Naipal, V., Oliveira, P. T. S., Bonilla, C. A., Meddi, M., Nel, W., Al Dashti, H., Boni, M., Diodato, N., Van Oost, K., Nearing, M., & Ballabio, C. (2017). Global rainfall erosivity assessment based on high-temporal resolution rainfall records. Nature Scientific Reports, 7, 4175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravongviengkham, P., Khamhung, A., Sysanhouth, K., & Qwist-Hoffmann, P. (2003). Integrated watershed management for sustainable upland development and poverty alleviation in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Repairing for the Next Generation of Watershed Management Programs and Projects (p. 105).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raum, S. (2018). Reasons for adoption and advocacy of the ecosystem services concept in UK forestry. Ecological Economics, 143, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, P., Sivapalan, M., & Hassanizadeh, S. M. (1998). A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. Advances in Water Resources, 22(4), 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, P., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Sivapalan, M., & Gray, W. G. (1999). A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: constitutive relationships. Advances in Water Resources, 23(1), 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, P., Sivapalan, M., & Hassanizadeh, S. M. (2000). Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: exploring the physical basis of water balance. Water Resources Research, 36(7), 845–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., & Yoder, D. C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) (Handbook 703). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodier, J. A. (1976). Utilization of the results from representative and experimental watersheds with a view to the management of water resources. Journal of Hydrological Sciences, 21(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., & Hazbavi, Z. (2015). Trend analysis of the rainfall erosivity index at different time scales in Iran. Natural Hazards, 77, 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., & Hazbavi, Z. (2017). Spatiotemporal variation of watershed health propensity through reliability-resilience-vulnerability based drought index (case study: Shazand Watershed in Iran). Science of the Total Environment, 587-588, 168–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Singh, J. K. (2001). Prioritization of sub-watersheds in generation of total sediment yield using routing model. In: Proceedings 3rd international conference on land degradation, Sep. 17–21, Brazil, S3-006. Livelihood and environmental security, India, Pantnagar, May 19–21, 46 p.

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Jalili, K., & Nikkami, D. (2009). Land use optimization in watershed scale. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Moosavi, V., Karami, A., & Behnia, N. (2012). Soil erosion assessment and prioritization of affecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method. Journal of Hydrology, 448, 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Bashari Seghaleh, M., & Rangavar, A. S. (2013). Plot sizes dependency of runoff and sediment yield estimates from a small watershed. Catena, 102, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Gholami, L., Sharifi, E., Khaledi Darvishan, A., & Homaee, M. (2015). Scale effect on runoff and soil loss control using rice mulch under laboratory conditions. Solid Earth, 6(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Zabihi, M., Vafakhah, M., & Hazbavi, Z. (2017). Spatiotemporal mapping of rainfall erosivity index for different return periods in Iran. Natural Hazards, 87(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoddin, A. (2010). Bayesian network models for integrated-scale management of salinity. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, AG & Co. KG 227 p.

  • Sadoddin, A., Sheikh, V. B., Mostafazadeh, R., & Halili, M. G. (2010). Analysis of vegetation-based management scenarios using MCDM in the Ramian Watershed, Golestan, Iran. Journal of Plant Production, 4(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoddin, A., Ownegh, M., Najafi Nejad, A., & Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2016). Development of a National Mega Research Project on the integrated watershed management for Iran. Environmental Resources Research, 4(2), 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivadivel, R., Bhattacharya, K., Scott, C. (2004). Biophysical and institutional factors in watershed management: a comparative analysis of four pilot watershed projects in India’s tribal belt, IWMI, 88 p.

  • Schiewe, J. (2017). Data classification for highlighting polygons with local extreme values in choropleth maps. International Cartographic Conference, ICACI 2017, 2–7 July, 2017, Washington, DC, USA. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Advances in cartography and GIScience. ICACI 2017. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 449–459). Springer, Cham Publisher.

  • Sherafati, M. (2016). Introduction and abstract of the pilot and representative watersheds. Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Management Organization, Watershed Management Deputy, Watershed Management and Soil Conservation Department of Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, 10 p. (In Persian).

  • Shotadze, M., Barnovi, E. (2011). Selection of pilot watersheds/areas. Technical report of integrated natural resources management in watersheds (INRMW) of Georgia Program, Global Water of Sustainability Program, USAID from the American people, 79 p.

  • Sieber, S., Amjath-Babu, T. S., Reidsma, P., Koenig, H., Piorr, A., Bezlepkina, I., & Mueller, K. (2018). Sustainability impact assessment tools for land use policy advice: a comparative analysis of five research approaches. Land Use Policy, 71, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Striffler, W.D. (1965). The selection of experimental watersheds and methods in disturbed forest area. In Anonymous, Symposium of Budapest, International Association of Surface Hydrologists, Budapest, Hungary, 464–473.

  • Subbotin, A. I. (1965). Use of observations at small representative watershed for calculations and forecasts of river run-off. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 10(4), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terefe, H. R., Asfaw, Z., & Demissew, S. (2015). The link between ethnobotany and watershed development for sustainable use of land and plant resources in Ethiopia. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography, 5, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, G. B. (2000). Integrated watershed management: basic concepts and issues. In Proceedings of the Training Course on Basic Concepts of Integrated Watershed Management (pp. 12–23). Vientiane.

  • Toebes, C., Ouryvaev, V. (1970). Representative and experimental watersheds. An International Guide for Research and Practice, An International Guide for Research and Practice United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, 348 p.

  • Toth, E. (2013). Catchment classification based on characterization of streamflow and precipitation time series. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(3), 1149 p, 1149, 1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urmia Lake Restoration Program (ULRP). (2017). http://ulrp.sharif.ir/en

  • Verhoest, N., Hudson, J., Hoeben, R., Troch, F. D. (2003). Monitoring and modelling catchment water quantity and quality: proceedings. In Technical documents in hydrology, UNESCO, 66 p.

  • Webb, A. A. (2012). Payments for watershed services and the role of experimental catchment studies. Revisiting Experimental Catchment Studies in Forest Hydrology, 353, 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, P. H., Burn, D. H., Hannaford, J., Higgins, H., Hodgkins, G. A., Marsh, T., & Looser, U. (2012). Reference hydrologic networks I. The status and potential future directions of national reference hydrologic networks for detecting trends. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57(8), 1562–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabihi, M., Sadeghi, S. H. R., & Vafakhah, M. (2016). Spatial analysis of rainfall erosivity index patterns at different time scales in Iran. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 7(4), 442–457 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami, M. (2011). Effective watershed management; case study of Urmia Lake, Iran. Lake and Reservoir Management, 27(1), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research was collaboratively supported by the Tarbiat Modares University and the National Mega Project on the Integrated Watershed Management in Iran whose valuable facilitation and financial supports are greatly appreciated. The authors also wish to express their gratitude to the corresponding authorities for their cooperation in field surveying and providing valuable data. Many thanks to Dr. A. Sadoddin, Dr. A. Khaledi Darvishan, Dr. Z. Hazbavi (Post-Doctorate Candidate at Agrohydrology Research Core, Tarbiat Modares University), and Mrs. S. Babaei for their assistances in project planning, providing necessary data, research documentation, and software analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Recognizing representative watershed is time and cost-effective for monitoring.

• Different combinations of data layers result in various representative indices.

• We introduced individual representative watersheds for Urmia sub-basins in Iran.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Comparison of representative watershed index (RWI %) in bi-partite dimensional matrix combinations of the study determinant variables for the Urmia Lake Watershed, Iran
Table 4 Comparison of representative watershed index (RWI %) in tri- and quadri-partite dimensional matrices combinations of the study determinant variables for the Urmia Lake Watershed, Iran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi, S.H., Kazemi Kia, S., Erfanian, M. et al. Identifying representative watershed for the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191, 45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7147-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7147-8

Keywords

Navigation