Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing the effectiveness of AHP for environmental performance assessment of Thailand and Taiwan’s food industry

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of green manufacturing is emerging as a means of enhancing a firm’s competitiveness through intelligent systems and process improvement to eliminate adverse effects on the environment. However, environmental performance (EPA) is challenging from the decision-making perspective because of difficulty determining and prioritising the proper factors that have significant effect on a firm’s EPA. This study was conducted with the objective of enhancing the effectiveness of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assess EPA by integrating exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factory analysis to validate suitable criteria and sub-criteria. A questionnaire survey was employed as a tool to collect data from 341 managers of Thailand and Taiwan’s food industry and the AHP approach used for normalisation, ranking, and simulation of sensitivity analysis. The results obtained indicate that quality policy, quality assurance, and quality control, respectively, are the three most important factors in the measurement of EPA, whereas organisational support in innovativeness is assigned the lowest priority. Based on simulations for sensitivity analysis, the results can be applied to guide managers’ decisions in the course of steering their firms towards sustainable manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, E., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. (2015). Group aggregation of pairwise comparisons using multi-objective optimization. Information Sciences, 322, 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asimina, S., Chapizanis, D., Karakitsios, S., & Kontoroupis, P. (2018). Assessing and enhancing the utility of low-cost activity and location sensors for exposure studies. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(155), 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6537-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341–2354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2011). Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9407–9424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis group, LLC.

  • Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2014). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: the influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1.

  • Cheng, C. C., Yang, C. L., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: a literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Figueirêdo, M. C. B., Rodrigues, G. S., Caldeira-Pires, A., de Freitas Rosa, M., de Aragão, F. A. S., Vieira, V. D. P. P. B., & Mota, F. S. B. (2010). Environmental performance evaluation of agro-industrial innovations–part 1: ambitec-life cycle, a methodological approach for considering life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1366–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., & Stabouli, M. (2006). A risk assessment approach in selecting environmental performance indicators. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610650456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dora, M., Kumar, M., Van Goubergen, D., Molnar, A., & Gellynck, X. (2013). Food quality management system: reviewing assessment strategies and a feasibility study for European food small and medium-sized enterprises. Food Control, 31(2), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., Kim, C. H., Sherbinin, A. D., Srebotnjak, T., Mara, V. (2008). 2008 environmental performance index.

  • Ferreira, J. G., Falconer, L., Kittiwanich, J., Ross, L., Saurel, C., Wellman, K., Zhu, C., & Suvanachai, P. (2015). Analysis of production and environmental effects of Nile tilapia and white shrimp culture in Thailand. Aquaculture, 447, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.08.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M., & Chang, C. (2014). Taiwan food processing ingredients 2014. In GAIN report number: TW14047. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Food%20Processing%20Ingredients_Taipei%20ATO_Taiwan_12-19-2014.pdf

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, A., Esty, D. C., Dale, L., & Rosengarten, C. (2016). Environmental performance index. Retrieved from www.epi.yale.edu.

  • Jorge, M. L., Madueño, J. H., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Sancho, M. P. L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: is there a direct link? Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokangül, A., Polat, U., & Dağsuyu, C. (2017). A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Safety Science, 91, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., & Lee, Y. T. (2014). A framework for a research inventory of sustainability assessment in manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisi, I. E. (2015). Translating environmental motivations into performance: the role of environmental performance measurement systems. Management Accounting Research, 29, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luning, P. A., & Marcelis, W. J. (2007). A conceptual model of food quality management functions based on a techno-managerial approach. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 18(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.10.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menikpura, S. N. M., Sang-Arun, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2016). Assessment of environmental and economic performance of waste-to-energy facilities in Thai cities. Renewable Energy, 86, 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NESDB. (2015). National Income of Thailand: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.

  • Pakkar, M. S. (2016). Using DEA and AHP for hierarchical structures of data. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 15(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2016.15.1.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotto, E., Canziani, R., Marchesi, R., & Butelli, P. (2008). Environmental performance, indicators and measurement uncertainty in EMS context: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, T. N., & Baird, K. (2015). The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: the influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 160, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punniyamoorty, M., Mathiyalagan, P., & Lakshmi, G. (2012). A combined application of structural equation modeling (SEM) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in supplier selection. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211218362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2011). Globalization: the essentials. Singapore: Ho Printing Singapore Pte. Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satumanatpan, S., Senawongse, P., Thansuporn, W., & Kirkman, H. (2014). Enhancing management effectiveness of environmental protected areas, Thailand. Ocean and Coastal Management, 89, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The United States of America: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, K. M., Kumar, P. U., & Kannan, D. (2016). Analyzing the drivers of advanced sustainable manufacturing system using AHP approach. Sustainability, 8(8), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H. A. (2011). Operations research: an introduction (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanki, S., Govindan, K., & Thakkar, J. (2016). An investigation on lean-green implementation practices in Indian SMEs using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulkhaq, M. M., Nartadhi, R. L., & Akshinta, P. Y. (2016). Evaluating service quality of Korean restaurants: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy approach. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 15(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2016.15.1.077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., & Qiang, X. (2018). Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6596-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anirut Pipatprapa.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 13 Measurement items for identifying suitable criteria and sub-criteria

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pipatprapa, A., Huang, HH. & Huang, CH. Enhancing the effectiveness of AHP for environmental performance assessment of Thailand and Taiwan’s food industry. Environ Monit Assess 190, 748 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7113-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7113-5

Keywords

Navigation