Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Urban ecosystem services delivered by green open spaces: an example from Nicosia City in North Cyprus

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the major urban ecosystem services (UESs) delivered by a number of green open spaces (GOSs) and their contributions to the human wellbeing (HWB) in four selected sites located in the city of Nicosia of North Cyprus. The objectives of the study were to map the dominant GOSs in the selected sites, to identify the plant species cultivated in the GOSs, and to evaluate the major UESs delivered by the GOSs and their contributions to the components of HWB. The conceptual framework of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment was adopted to evaluate the linkages between the different types/components of GOSs, UESs, and HWB. The relevant data were collected by combining quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews and field surveys) research tools. The collected data were evaluated on a 1–5 Likert scale. Overall, 31 UESs and 14 components of HWB were evaluated. The results of the evaluation revealed that 229 plant species are cultivated in the GOSs. The total average relative value of the UESs delivered by the dominant GOSs was estimated to be very low with 2.43 points. The total average relative contribution of the UESs to the HWB seems to be low with 3.56 points. Plant diversity was identified as the main criterion that influences the degree of UESs. We hope that the results of this study can help policy-makers and planners to design more effective policies in terms of building resilient cities and societies in the city of Nicosia and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P. J., Cook, M., & Morris, J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26, 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • al-Asad, M. (2007). Rehabilitation of the walled City Nicosia, Cyprus. On site review report, 2098. CYP. https://archnet.org/system/publications/contents/1564/original/FLS1807.pdf?1384750430. Accessed 27 July 2018.

  • Bennett, E. M., & Chaplin-Kramer, R. (2016). Science for the sustainable use of ecosystem services. F1000Research, 5, 2622. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9470.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard, B., Petrosillo, I., & Constanza, R. (2010). Ecosystem services: bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecological Complexity, 7, 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., & Sipe, N. (2010). Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – a review of the literature and best practice. Urban Research Program, Issues paper 11. https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/34502/62968_1.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Carabine, E., Venton, C. C., Tanner, T., & Bahadur, A. (2015). The contribution of ecosystem services to human resilience. Shaping policy for development. February 2015. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9394.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2017

  • Çevikel, N. (2000). Kıbrıs – Akdeniz’de bir Osmanlı Adası (1570–1878), 47 Numaralı Yayıncılık/Tarih – İnceleme Dizisi, İstanbul.

  • Ciftcioglu, G. C. (2017). Social preference-based valuation of the links between home gardens, ecosystem services, and human well-being in Lefke Region of North Cyprus. Ecosystem Services, 25, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cvejić, R., Eler, K., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., & Strohbach, M. (2015). A typology of urban green spaces, eco-system services provisioning services and demands. The EU FP7 (ENV.2013.6.2-5- 603567) GREEN SURGE project (2013–2017). https://greensurge.eu/working-packages/wp3/files/D3.1_Typology_of_urban_green_spaces_1_.pdf/D3.1_Typology_of_urban_green_spaces_v2_.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delipetrou, P., Makhzoumi, J., Dimopoulos, P., & Georghiou, K. (2008). Cyprus. In I. Vogiatzakis, G. Pungetti, & A. M. Mannion (Eds.), Mediterranean island landscapes, natural and cultural approaches (pp. 170–219). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Della, A., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., & Hadjichambis, A. C. (2006). An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants of Paphos and Larnaca countryside of Cyprus. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2, 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendoncker, N., Keune, H., Jacobs, S., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. (2013). Inclusive ecosystem services valuation. In S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, & H. Keune (Eds.), Ecosystem services: global issues, local practices (pp. 3–12). San Diego: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, N., Swanwick, C., & Woolley, H. (2002). Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces. May 2002. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. UK. http://publiekeruimte.info/Data/Documents/e842aqrm/53/Improving-Urban-Parks.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Elmqvist, T. (2011). Ecosystem services and social systems in urban landscapes. In J. Niemela, J. H. Breuste, G. Guntenspergen, N. E. Mclntyre, T. Elmqvist, & P. James (Eds.), Urban ecology: patterns, processes, and applications (pp. 182–189). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farinha-Marques, P., Fernandes, C., Guilherme, F., Lameiras, J. M., Alves, P., & Bunce, R. G. H. (2017). Urban habitats biodiversity assessment (UrHBA): a standardized procedure for recording biodiversity and its spatial distribution in urban environments. Landscape Ecology, 32(9), 1753–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Martín-López, B. (2015). Ecological perspectives on ecosystem services valuation (Chapter 11). In J. Martinez-Alier & R. Muradian (Eds.), Handbook of ecological economics (pp. 260–282). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, A., Barton, D. N., Langemeyer, J., McPhearson, T., O’Farrell, P., Andersson, E., Hamstead, Z., & Kremer, P. (2013). Urban ecosystem services (chapter 11). In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, M. Sendstad, K. C. Seto, & C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities, a global assessment (pp. 175–252). Springer.

  • Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Baggethun, E. G., Gren, A., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E. L., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., Wurster, D., & Elmqvist, T. (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43(4), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J. (2011). Benefits of green space – recent research, April 25, 2011. Environmental Health Research Foundation. Chantilly, VA 20153. http://www.ehrf.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/BenefitsofGreenSpace.pdf . Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Jacobs, S., Martin-Lopez, B., Barton, D. N., Dunford, R., Harrison, P., Kelemen, E., Saarikoski, H., Termansen, M., Garcia-Llorente, M., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Kopperoinen, L., Luque, S., Palomo, I., Priess, J. A., Rusch, G. M., Tenerelli, P., Turkelboom, F., Demeyer, R., & Smith, R. (2018). The means determine the end – pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosystem Services, 29(PC), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C. Y., & Chen, S. S. (2003). Comprehensive green space planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 998, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, E., Garcia-Llorente, M., Pataki, G., Martin-Lopez, B., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. (2014). Non-monetary techniques for the valuation of ecosystem services. Open-NESS Synthesis Papers No. 6. http://www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/SP-Non-monetary-valuation.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • KKTC Devlet Planlama Örgütü. (2013). KKTC Nüfus Sayımı, 2011. https://www.devplan.org/Nufus-2011/nufus%20ikinci_pdf. Accessed 24 September 2018.

  • KKTC Devlet Planlama Örgütü. (2015). 2010–2013 makro ekonomik ve sektörel gelişmeler. Eylül 2015. https://www.devplan.org/Macro-eco/MACRO20102013.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2018.

  • KKTC Devlet Planlama Örgütü. (2016). İstatistik yıllığı 2013. http://www.devplan.org/ISTYILLIK/IST-YILLIK-2013.pdf. Accessed 23 December 2017.

  • Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-layered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maller, C., Townsend, M., St. Leger, L., Henderson-Wilson, C., Pryor, A., & Prosser, L. (2008). Healthy parks, healthy people, the health benefits of contact with nature in a park context. A review of relevant literature. 2nd edition, March 2008. Deakin University, Melbourne. https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/310750/HPHP-2nd-Edition.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2018.

  • Martinez-Harms, M. J., Bryan, B. A., Balvanera, P., Law, E. A., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González, J. A., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2009). The assessment of ecosystem services: re-thinking concepts and research needs (Chapter 9). In J. B. Aronoff (Ed.), Handbook of nature conservation. Nova Science Publishers Inc. http://www.ecomilenio.es/ecodocs/documentos/20090626-111959_Articulo_Funciones_Servicios_Conceptos.pdf . Accessed 01 February 2017.

  • Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., & Montes, C. (2014). Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem service assessment. Ecological Indicators, 37, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson, T., Hamstead, Z. A., & Kremer, P. (2014). Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York City. Ambio, 43, 502–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC, Island Press.

  • Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Nilon, C. H., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., & Costanza, R. (2001). Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger, T., van der Horst, D., Schleyer, C., & Bieling, C. (2014). Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhshandehroo, M., Mohdyusof, M. J., Tahirholder, O. M., & Yunos, M. Y. M. (2015). The social benefits of urban open green spaces: a literature review. Management Research and Practice, 7(4), 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martín, F., GarcíaLlorente, M., Quintas-Soriano, C., Zorrilla-Miras, P., Martín-López, B., Loureiro, M., Benayas, J., & Montes, M. (2016). Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: Socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of the key findings. Madrid: Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment ISBN: 978-84-608-8776-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martin, F., Kelemen, E., Garcia Llorente, M., & Martín-López, B. (2017). Socio-cultural valuation approaches (Chapter 4.2). In B. Burkhard & J. Maes (Eds.), Mapping ecosystem services (pp. 104–114). Pensoft https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315716370_Socio-cultural_valuation_approaches. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., & Woolley, H. (2003). Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environment, 29(2), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). (2011). TEEB Manuel for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. In: UNEP and the European Union (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Manuel for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management.

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2017). Progress towards the sustainable development goals. Report of the Secretary-General. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/2017/66&Lang=E. Accessed on 30 December 2017.

  • van der Velden, M. (2015). The link between biodiversity and ecosystem services: how to incorporate scientific knowledge into a conservation strategy. Master Thesis. The University of Utrecht. The Netherlands.

  • Wentworth, J. (2017). Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services. Houses of Parliament, Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology. POST Brief Number 26, July 2017. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PB-0026/POST-PB-0026.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2016). Urban green spaces and health. Copenhagen: WHO http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/321971/Urban-green-spaces-and-health-review-evidence.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 31 July 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldatlas. (2018). Map of the Mediterranean Sea. https://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/infopage/medsea.htm. Accessed 31 July 2018.

  • Yli-Pelkonen, V., & Niemelä, J. (2005). Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1947–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, European University of Lefke, Gemikonagi, Mersin 10, Turkey

    Gulay Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu & Aslihan Aydin

Authors
  1. Gulay Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aslihan Aydin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulay Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ciftcioglu, G.C., Aydin, A. Urban ecosystem services delivered by green open spaces: an example from Nicosia City in North Cyprus. Environ Monit Assess 190, 613 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6985-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6985-8

Keywords